Value of preoperative three-dimensional planning software (AI-HIP) in primary total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE: We performed a retrospective study to compare the accuracy of preoperative planning using three-dimensional AI-HIP software and traditional two-dimensional manual templating to predict the size and position of prostheses. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of AI-HIP in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ding, Xuzhuang, Zhang, Bingshi, Li, Wenao, Huo, Jia, Liu, Sikai, Wu, Tao, Han, Yongtai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8597071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34775845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605211058874
_version_ 1784600531325419520
author Ding, Xuzhuang
Zhang, Bingshi
Li, Wenao
Huo, Jia
Liu, Sikai
Wu, Tao
Han, Yongtai
author_facet Ding, Xuzhuang
Zhang, Bingshi
Li, Wenao
Huo, Jia
Liu, Sikai
Wu, Tao
Han, Yongtai
author_sort Ding, Xuzhuang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We performed a retrospective study to compare the accuracy of preoperative planning using three-dimensional AI-HIP software and traditional two-dimensional manual templating to predict the size and position of prostheses. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of AI-HIP in preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: In total, 316 hips treated from April 2019 to June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. A typical preoperative planning process for patients was implemented to compare the accuracy of the two preoperative planning methods with respect to prosthetic size and position. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to evaluate the homogeneity between the actual prosthetic size and position and the preoperative planning method. RESULTS: When AI-HIP software and manual templating were used for preoperative planning, the stem agreement was 87.7% and 58.9%, respectively, and the cup agreement was 94.0% and 65.2%, respectively. The results showed that when AI-HIP software was used, an extremely high level of consistency (ICC > 0.95) was achieved for the femoral stem size, cup size, and femoral osteotomy level (ICC = 0.972, 0.962, and 0.961, respectively). CONCLUSION: AI-HIP software showed excellent reliability for predicting the component size and implant position in primary total hip arthroplasty.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8597071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85970712021-11-18 Value of preoperative three-dimensional planning software (AI-HIP) in primary total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study Ding, Xuzhuang Zhang, Bingshi Li, Wenao Huo, Jia Liu, Sikai Wu, Tao Han, Yongtai J Int Med Res Retrospective Clinical Research Report OBJECTIVE: We performed a retrospective study to compare the accuracy of preoperative planning using three-dimensional AI-HIP software and traditional two-dimensional manual templating to predict the size and position of prostheses. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of AI-HIP in preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: In total, 316 hips treated from April 2019 to June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. A typical preoperative planning process for patients was implemented to compare the accuracy of the two preoperative planning methods with respect to prosthetic size and position. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to evaluate the homogeneity between the actual prosthetic size and position and the preoperative planning method. RESULTS: When AI-HIP software and manual templating were used for preoperative planning, the stem agreement was 87.7% and 58.9%, respectively, and the cup agreement was 94.0% and 65.2%, respectively. The results showed that when AI-HIP software was used, an extremely high level of consistency (ICC > 0.95) was achieved for the femoral stem size, cup size, and femoral osteotomy level (ICC = 0.972, 0.962, and 0.961, respectively). CONCLUSION: AI-HIP software showed excellent reliability for predicting the component size and implant position in primary total hip arthroplasty. SAGE Publications 2021-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8597071/ /pubmed/34775845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605211058874 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Retrospective Clinical Research Report
Ding, Xuzhuang
Zhang, Bingshi
Li, Wenao
Huo, Jia
Liu, Sikai
Wu, Tao
Han, Yongtai
Value of preoperative three-dimensional planning software (AI-HIP) in primary total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study
title Value of preoperative three-dimensional planning software (AI-HIP) in primary total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study
title_full Value of preoperative three-dimensional planning software (AI-HIP) in primary total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Value of preoperative three-dimensional planning software (AI-HIP) in primary total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Value of preoperative three-dimensional planning software (AI-HIP) in primary total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study
title_short Value of preoperative three-dimensional planning software (AI-HIP) in primary total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study
title_sort value of preoperative three-dimensional planning software (ai-hip) in primary total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study
topic Retrospective Clinical Research Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8597071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34775845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605211058874
work_keys_str_mv AT dingxuzhuang valueofpreoperativethreedimensionalplanningsoftwareaihipinprimarytotalhiparthroplastyaretrospectivestudy
AT zhangbingshi valueofpreoperativethreedimensionalplanningsoftwareaihipinprimarytotalhiparthroplastyaretrospectivestudy
AT liwenao valueofpreoperativethreedimensionalplanningsoftwareaihipinprimarytotalhiparthroplastyaretrospectivestudy
AT huojia valueofpreoperativethreedimensionalplanningsoftwareaihipinprimarytotalhiparthroplastyaretrospectivestudy
AT liusikai valueofpreoperativethreedimensionalplanningsoftwareaihipinprimarytotalhiparthroplastyaretrospectivestudy
AT wutao valueofpreoperativethreedimensionalplanningsoftwareaihipinprimarytotalhiparthroplastyaretrospectivestudy
AT hanyongtai valueofpreoperativethreedimensionalplanningsoftwareaihipinprimarytotalhiparthroplastyaretrospectivestudy