Cargando…
Colistin resistance in Gram-negative bacteria analysed by five phenotypic assays and inference of the underlying genomic mechanisms
BACKGROUND: Colistin is used against multi-drug resistant pathogens, yet resistance emerges through dissemination of plasmid-mediated genes (mcr) or chromosomal mutation of genes involved in lipopolysaccharide synthesis (i.e. mgrB, phoPQ, pmrCAB). Phenotypic susceptibility testing is challenging due...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8605564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34798825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02388-8 |
_version_ | 1784602207087230976 |
---|---|
author | Torres, Diana Albertos Seth-Smith, Helena M. B. Joosse, Nicole Lang, Claudia Dubuis, Olivier Nüesch-Inderbinen, Magdalena Hinic, Vladimira Egli, Adrian |
author_facet | Torres, Diana Albertos Seth-Smith, Helena M. B. Joosse, Nicole Lang, Claudia Dubuis, Olivier Nüesch-Inderbinen, Magdalena Hinic, Vladimira Egli, Adrian |
author_sort | Torres, Diana Albertos |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Colistin is used against multi-drug resistant pathogens, yet resistance emerges through dissemination of plasmid-mediated genes (mcr) or chromosomal mutation of genes involved in lipopolysaccharide synthesis (i.e. mgrB, phoPQ, pmrCAB). Phenotypic susceptibility testing is challenging due to poor diffusion of colistin in agar media, leading to an underestimation of resistance. Performance of five phenotypic approaches was compared in the context of different molecular mechanisms of resistance. We evaluated Vitek 2® (bioMérieux, AST N242), Colistin MIC Test Strip (Liofilchem Diagnostici), UMIC (Biocentric), and Rapid Polymyxin™ NP test (ELITechGroup) against the standard broth microdilution (BMD) method. We used whole genome sequencing (WGS) to infer molecular resistance mechanisms. We analysed 97 Enterobacterales and non-fermenting bacterial isolates, largely clinical isolates collected up to 2018. Data was analysed by comparing susceptibility categories (susceptible or resistant) and minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC). Susceptibility category concordance is the percentage of test results sharing the same category to BMD. MIC concordance was calculated similarly but considering ±1 MIC titre error range. We determined genomic diversity by core genome multi locus sequencing typing (cgMLST) and identified putative antimicrobial resistance genes using NCBI and CARD databases, and manual annotation. RESULTS: Of 97 isolates, 54 (56%) were resistant with standard BMD. Highest susceptibility category concordance was achieved by Rapid Polymyxin™ NP (98.8%) followed by UMIC (97.9%), Colistin E-test MIC strip (96.9%) and Vitek 2® (95.6%). Highest MIC concordance was achieved by UMIC (80.4%), followed by Vitek 2® (72.5%) and Colistin E-test MIC strip (62.9%). Among resistant isolates, 23/54 (43%) were intrinsically resistant to colistin, whereas 31/54 (57%) isolates had acquired colistin resistance. Of these, mcr-1 was detected in four isolates and mcr-2 in one isolate. Non-synonymous mutations in mgrB, phoQ, pmrA, pmrB, and pmrC genes were encountered in Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and Acinetobacter bereziniae resistant isolates. Mutations found in mgrB and pmrB were only identified in isolates exhibiting MICs of ≥16 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: The Rapid Polymyxin™ NP test showed highest categorical concordance and the UMIC test provided MIC values with high concordance to BMD. We found colistin resistance in diverse species occurred predominantly through spontaneous chromosomal mutation rather than plasmid-mediated resistance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12866-021-02388-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8605564 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86055642021-11-22 Colistin resistance in Gram-negative bacteria analysed by five phenotypic assays and inference of the underlying genomic mechanisms Torres, Diana Albertos Seth-Smith, Helena M. B. Joosse, Nicole Lang, Claudia Dubuis, Olivier Nüesch-Inderbinen, Magdalena Hinic, Vladimira Egli, Adrian BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Colistin is used against multi-drug resistant pathogens, yet resistance emerges through dissemination of plasmid-mediated genes (mcr) or chromosomal mutation of genes involved in lipopolysaccharide synthesis (i.e. mgrB, phoPQ, pmrCAB). Phenotypic susceptibility testing is challenging due to poor diffusion of colistin in agar media, leading to an underestimation of resistance. Performance of five phenotypic approaches was compared in the context of different molecular mechanisms of resistance. We evaluated Vitek 2® (bioMérieux, AST N242), Colistin MIC Test Strip (Liofilchem Diagnostici), UMIC (Biocentric), and Rapid Polymyxin™ NP test (ELITechGroup) against the standard broth microdilution (BMD) method. We used whole genome sequencing (WGS) to infer molecular resistance mechanisms. We analysed 97 Enterobacterales and non-fermenting bacterial isolates, largely clinical isolates collected up to 2018. Data was analysed by comparing susceptibility categories (susceptible or resistant) and minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC). Susceptibility category concordance is the percentage of test results sharing the same category to BMD. MIC concordance was calculated similarly but considering ±1 MIC titre error range. We determined genomic diversity by core genome multi locus sequencing typing (cgMLST) and identified putative antimicrobial resistance genes using NCBI and CARD databases, and manual annotation. RESULTS: Of 97 isolates, 54 (56%) were resistant with standard BMD. Highest susceptibility category concordance was achieved by Rapid Polymyxin™ NP (98.8%) followed by UMIC (97.9%), Colistin E-test MIC strip (96.9%) and Vitek 2® (95.6%). Highest MIC concordance was achieved by UMIC (80.4%), followed by Vitek 2® (72.5%) and Colistin E-test MIC strip (62.9%). Among resistant isolates, 23/54 (43%) were intrinsically resistant to colistin, whereas 31/54 (57%) isolates had acquired colistin resistance. Of these, mcr-1 was detected in four isolates and mcr-2 in one isolate. Non-synonymous mutations in mgrB, phoQ, pmrA, pmrB, and pmrC genes were encountered in Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and Acinetobacter bereziniae resistant isolates. Mutations found in mgrB and pmrB were only identified in isolates exhibiting MICs of ≥16 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: The Rapid Polymyxin™ NP test showed highest categorical concordance and the UMIC test provided MIC values with high concordance to BMD. We found colistin resistance in diverse species occurred predominantly through spontaneous chromosomal mutation rather than plasmid-mediated resistance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12866-021-02388-8. BioMed Central 2021-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8605564/ /pubmed/34798825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02388-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Torres, Diana Albertos Seth-Smith, Helena M. B. Joosse, Nicole Lang, Claudia Dubuis, Olivier Nüesch-Inderbinen, Magdalena Hinic, Vladimira Egli, Adrian Colistin resistance in Gram-negative bacteria analysed by five phenotypic assays and inference of the underlying genomic mechanisms |
title | Colistin resistance in Gram-negative bacteria analysed by five phenotypic assays and inference of the underlying genomic mechanisms |
title_full | Colistin resistance in Gram-negative bacteria analysed by five phenotypic assays and inference of the underlying genomic mechanisms |
title_fullStr | Colistin resistance in Gram-negative bacteria analysed by five phenotypic assays and inference of the underlying genomic mechanisms |
title_full_unstemmed | Colistin resistance in Gram-negative bacteria analysed by five phenotypic assays and inference of the underlying genomic mechanisms |
title_short | Colistin resistance in Gram-negative bacteria analysed by five phenotypic assays and inference of the underlying genomic mechanisms |
title_sort | colistin resistance in gram-negative bacteria analysed by five phenotypic assays and inference of the underlying genomic mechanisms |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8605564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34798825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02388-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT torresdianaalbertos colistinresistanceingramnegativebacteriaanalysedbyfivephenotypicassaysandinferenceoftheunderlyinggenomicmechanisms AT sethsmithhelenamb colistinresistanceingramnegativebacteriaanalysedbyfivephenotypicassaysandinferenceoftheunderlyinggenomicmechanisms AT joossenicole colistinresistanceingramnegativebacteriaanalysedbyfivephenotypicassaysandinferenceoftheunderlyinggenomicmechanisms AT langclaudia colistinresistanceingramnegativebacteriaanalysedbyfivephenotypicassaysandinferenceoftheunderlyinggenomicmechanisms AT dubuisolivier colistinresistanceingramnegativebacteriaanalysedbyfivephenotypicassaysandinferenceoftheunderlyinggenomicmechanisms AT nueschinderbinenmagdalena colistinresistanceingramnegativebacteriaanalysedbyfivephenotypicassaysandinferenceoftheunderlyinggenomicmechanisms AT hinicvladimira colistinresistanceingramnegativebacteriaanalysedbyfivephenotypicassaysandinferenceoftheunderlyinggenomicmechanisms AT egliadrian colistinresistanceingramnegativebacteriaanalysedbyfivephenotypicassaysandinferenceoftheunderlyinggenomicmechanisms |