Cargando…
Comparing the Clinical Utility and Diagnostic Performance of CSF P-Tau181, P-Tau217, and P-Tau231 Assays
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Phosphorylated tau (p-tau) in CSF is considered an important biomarker in Alzheimer disease (AD) and has been incorporated in recent diagnostic criteria. Several variants exist, including p-tau at threonines 181 (p-tau181), 217 (p-tau217), and 231 (p-tau231). However, no s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8605616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34493616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000012727 |
_version_ | 1784602218301751296 |
---|---|
author | Leuzy, Antoine Janelidze, Shorena Mattsson-Carlgren, Niklas Palmqvist, Sebastian Jacobs, Dirk Cicognola, Claudia Stomrud, Erik Vanmechelen, Eugeen Dage, Jeffrey L. Hansson, Oskar |
author_facet | Leuzy, Antoine Janelidze, Shorena Mattsson-Carlgren, Niklas Palmqvist, Sebastian Jacobs, Dirk Cicognola, Claudia Stomrud, Erik Vanmechelen, Eugeen Dage, Jeffrey L. Hansson, Oskar |
author_sort | Leuzy, Antoine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Phosphorylated tau (p-tau) in CSF is considered an important biomarker in Alzheimer disease (AD) and has been incorporated in recent diagnostic criteria. Several variants exist, including p-tau at threonines 181 (p-tau181), 217 (p-tau217), and 231 (p-tau231). However, no studies have compared their diagnostic performance or association to β-amyloid (Aβ) and tau-PET. Understanding which p-tau variant to use remains an important yet answered question. We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of p-tau181, p-tau217, and p-tau231 in CSF for AD and their association with Aβ and tau-PET. METHODS: A total of 629 participants in the Swedish BioFINDER-2 study were included (cognitively unimpaired, n = 334; Aβ-positive mild cognitive impairment, n = 84; AD dementia, n = 119; and non-AD disorders, n = 92). In addition to p-tau181 and p-tau217 measured using assays with the same detector antibodies from Eli Lilly (p-tau181(Lilly), p-tau217(Lilly)) and p-tau231, we also included p-tau181 measurements from 2 commonly used assays (Innotest and Elecsys). RESULTS: Although all p-tau variants increased across the AD continuum, p-tau217(Lilly) showed the greatest dynamic range (13-fold increase vs 1.9–5.4-fold increase for other p-tau variants for AD dementia vs non-AD). P-Tau217(Lilly) showed stronger correlations with Aβ- and tau-PET (p < 0.0001). P-Tau217(Lilly) exhibited higher accuracy than other p-tau variants for separating AD dementia from non-AD (area under the curve [AUC], 0.98 vs 0.88 [p < 0.0001] - 0.96 [p < 0.05]) and for identifying Aβ-PET (AUC, 0.86 vs 0.74 [p < 0.0001] and 0.83 [p < 0.001]) and tau-PET positivity (AUC, 0.94 vs 0.80—0.92, p < 0.0001). Finally, p-Tau181(Lilly) generally performed better than the other p-tau181 assays (e.g., AD dementia vs non-AD, AUC, 0.96 vs 0.88 [p-tau181(Innotest)] and 0.89 [p-tau181(Elecsys)]; p < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: CSF p-tau217(Lilly) seems to be more useful than other included p-tau assays in the workup of AD. Varied results across p-tau181 assays highlights the importance of anti-tau antibodies for biomarker performance. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that p-tau217 provides higher diagnostic accuracy for diagnosis of AD dementia than p-tau181 or p-tau231. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8605616 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86056162021-11-22 Comparing the Clinical Utility and Diagnostic Performance of CSF P-Tau181, P-Tau217, and P-Tau231 Assays Leuzy, Antoine Janelidze, Shorena Mattsson-Carlgren, Niklas Palmqvist, Sebastian Jacobs, Dirk Cicognola, Claudia Stomrud, Erik Vanmechelen, Eugeen Dage, Jeffrey L. Hansson, Oskar Neurology Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Phosphorylated tau (p-tau) in CSF is considered an important biomarker in Alzheimer disease (AD) and has been incorporated in recent diagnostic criteria. Several variants exist, including p-tau at threonines 181 (p-tau181), 217 (p-tau217), and 231 (p-tau231). However, no studies have compared their diagnostic performance or association to β-amyloid (Aβ) and tau-PET. Understanding which p-tau variant to use remains an important yet answered question. We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of p-tau181, p-tau217, and p-tau231 in CSF for AD and their association with Aβ and tau-PET. METHODS: A total of 629 participants in the Swedish BioFINDER-2 study were included (cognitively unimpaired, n = 334; Aβ-positive mild cognitive impairment, n = 84; AD dementia, n = 119; and non-AD disorders, n = 92). In addition to p-tau181 and p-tau217 measured using assays with the same detector antibodies from Eli Lilly (p-tau181(Lilly), p-tau217(Lilly)) and p-tau231, we also included p-tau181 measurements from 2 commonly used assays (Innotest and Elecsys). RESULTS: Although all p-tau variants increased across the AD continuum, p-tau217(Lilly) showed the greatest dynamic range (13-fold increase vs 1.9–5.4-fold increase for other p-tau variants for AD dementia vs non-AD). P-Tau217(Lilly) showed stronger correlations with Aβ- and tau-PET (p < 0.0001). P-Tau217(Lilly) exhibited higher accuracy than other p-tau variants for separating AD dementia from non-AD (area under the curve [AUC], 0.98 vs 0.88 [p < 0.0001] - 0.96 [p < 0.05]) and for identifying Aβ-PET (AUC, 0.86 vs 0.74 [p < 0.0001] and 0.83 [p < 0.001]) and tau-PET positivity (AUC, 0.94 vs 0.80—0.92, p < 0.0001). Finally, p-Tau181(Lilly) generally performed better than the other p-tau181 assays (e.g., AD dementia vs non-AD, AUC, 0.96 vs 0.88 [p-tau181(Innotest)] and 0.89 [p-tau181(Elecsys)]; p < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: CSF p-tau217(Lilly) seems to be more useful than other included p-tau assays in the workup of AD. Varied results across p-tau181 assays highlights the importance of anti-tau antibodies for biomarker performance. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that p-tau217 provides higher diagnostic accuracy for diagnosis of AD dementia than p-tau181 or p-tau231. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8605616/ /pubmed/34493616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000012727 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Leuzy, Antoine Janelidze, Shorena Mattsson-Carlgren, Niklas Palmqvist, Sebastian Jacobs, Dirk Cicognola, Claudia Stomrud, Erik Vanmechelen, Eugeen Dage, Jeffrey L. Hansson, Oskar Comparing the Clinical Utility and Diagnostic Performance of CSF P-Tau181, P-Tau217, and P-Tau231 Assays |
title | Comparing the Clinical Utility and Diagnostic Performance of CSF P-Tau181, P-Tau217, and P-Tau231 Assays |
title_full | Comparing the Clinical Utility and Diagnostic Performance of CSF P-Tau181, P-Tau217, and P-Tau231 Assays |
title_fullStr | Comparing the Clinical Utility and Diagnostic Performance of CSF P-Tau181, P-Tau217, and P-Tau231 Assays |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing the Clinical Utility and Diagnostic Performance of CSF P-Tau181, P-Tau217, and P-Tau231 Assays |
title_short | Comparing the Clinical Utility and Diagnostic Performance of CSF P-Tau181, P-Tau217, and P-Tau231 Assays |
title_sort | comparing the clinical utility and diagnostic performance of csf p-tau181, p-tau217, and p-tau231 assays |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8605616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34493616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000012727 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leuzyantoine comparingtheclinicalutilityanddiagnosticperformanceofcsfptau181ptau217andptau231assays AT janelidzeshorena comparingtheclinicalutilityanddiagnosticperformanceofcsfptau181ptau217andptau231assays AT mattssoncarlgrenniklas comparingtheclinicalutilityanddiagnosticperformanceofcsfptau181ptau217andptau231assays AT palmqvistsebastian comparingtheclinicalutilityanddiagnosticperformanceofcsfptau181ptau217andptau231assays AT jacobsdirk comparingtheclinicalutilityanddiagnosticperformanceofcsfptau181ptau217andptau231assays AT cicognolaclaudia comparingtheclinicalutilityanddiagnosticperformanceofcsfptau181ptau217andptau231assays AT stomruderik comparingtheclinicalutilityanddiagnosticperformanceofcsfptau181ptau217andptau231assays AT vanmecheleneugeen comparingtheclinicalutilityanddiagnosticperformanceofcsfptau181ptau217andptau231assays AT dagejeffreyl comparingtheclinicalutilityanddiagnosticperformanceofcsfptau181ptau217andptau231assays AT hanssonoskar comparingtheclinicalutilityanddiagnosticperformanceofcsfptau181ptau217andptau231assays |