Cargando…
Connecting teachers’ classroom instructions with children’s metacognition and learning in elementary school
Many children have difficulties with accurate self-monitoring and effective regulation of study, and this may cause them to miss learning opportunities. In the classroom, teachers play a key role in supporting children with metacognition and learning. The present study aimed to acquire insights into...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8616875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34867118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09248-2 |
_version_ | 1784604423701397504 |
---|---|
author | van Loon, Mariëtte H. Bayard, Natalie S. Steiner, Martina Roebers, Claudia M. |
author_facet | van Loon, Mariëtte H. Bayard, Natalie S. Steiner, Martina Roebers, Claudia M. |
author_sort | van Loon, Mariëtte H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many children have difficulties with accurate self-monitoring and effective regulation of study, and this may cause them to miss learning opportunities. In the classroom, teachers play a key role in supporting children with metacognition and learning. The present study aimed to acquire insights into how teachers’ cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction, as well as teacher-directed and child-centered instructional practices are related to children’s self-monitoring accuracy, regulation of study, and learning performance. Twenty-one teachers and 308 children (2nd and 4th grade elementary school) participated. Teachers instructed a secret code task, children had to learn the match between letters of the alphabet and corresponding symbols. Teachers were observed and audio-recordings were made of their instructions. Then, children were asked to (a) make restudy selections, (b) complete a test, and (c) self-monitor test performance. Although teachers both addressed cognitive and metacognitive strategies, they more often instructed children about cognitive strategies. Further, teaching practices were more often teacher-directed than child-centered. Although there were no relations between teachers’ instructions for metacognitive strategies and children’s outcome measures, teaching cognitive strategies was positively associated with children’s performance and self-monitoring accuracy. However, teaching cognitive strategies did not predict effective restudy selections. Rather, child-centered instructions (i.e., giving children autonomy to regulate their own learning) positively predicted children’s restudy, and further, children’s self-monitoring was more accurate in classrooms where teachers more often used child-centered instructional practices. This seems to imply that not only the content of the instructions itself, but particularly the way these are given, affects children’s metacognition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8616875 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86168752021-12-01 Connecting teachers’ classroom instructions with children’s metacognition and learning in elementary school van Loon, Mariëtte H. Bayard, Natalie S. Steiner, Martina Roebers, Claudia M. Metacogn Learn Article Many children have difficulties with accurate self-monitoring and effective regulation of study, and this may cause them to miss learning opportunities. In the classroom, teachers play a key role in supporting children with metacognition and learning. The present study aimed to acquire insights into how teachers’ cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction, as well as teacher-directed and child-centered instructional practices are related to children’s self-monitoring accuracy, regulation of study, and learning performance. Twenty-one teachers and 308 children (2nd and 4th grade elementary school) participated. Teachers instructed a secret code task, children had to learn the match between letters of the alphabet and corresponding symbols. Teachers were observed and audio-recordings were made of their instructions. Then, children were asked to (a) make restudy selections, (b) complete a test, and (c) self-monitor test performance. Although teachers both addressed cognitive and metacognitive strategies, they more often instructed children about cognitive strategies. Further, teaching practices were more often teacher-directed than child-centered. Although there were no relations between teachers’ instructions for metacognitive strategies and children’s outcome measures, teaching cognitive strategies was positively associated with children’s performance and self-monitoring accuracy. However, teaching cognitive strategies did not predict effective restudy selections. Rather, child-centered instructions (i.e., giving children autonomy to regulate their own learning) positively predicted children’s restudy, and further, children’s self-monitoring was more accurate in classrooms where teachers more often used child-centered instructional practices. This seems to imply that not only the content of the instructions itself, but particularly the way these are given, affects children’s metacognition. Springer US 2021-11-20 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8616875/ /pubmed/34867118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09248-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article van Loon, Mariëtte H. Bayard, Natalie S. Steiner, Martina Roebers, Claudia M. Connecting teachers’ classroom instructions with children’s metacognition and learning in elementary school |
title | Connecting teachers’ classroom instructions with children’s metacognition and learning in elementary school |
title_full | Connecting teachers’ classroom instructions with children’s metacognition and learning in elementary school |
title_fullStr | Connecting teachers’ classroom instructions with children’s metacognition and learning in elementary school |
title_full_unstemmed | Connecting teachers’ classroom instructions with children’s metacognition and learning in elementary school |
title_short | Connecting teachers’ classroom instructions with children’s metacognition and learning in elementary school |
title_sort | connecting teachers’ classroom instructions with children’s metacognition and learning in elementary school |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8616875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34867118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09248-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanloonmarietteh connectingteachersclassroominstructionswithchildrensmetacognitionandlearninginelementaryschool AT bayardnatalies connectingteachersclassroominstructionswithchildrensmetacognitionandlearninginelementaryschool AT steinermartina connectingteachersclassroominstructionswithchildrensmetacognitionandlearninginelementaryschool AT roebersclaudiam connectingteachersclassroominstructionswithchildrensmetacognitionandlearninginelementaryschool |