Cargando…
Microbiological Quality and Resistance to an Artificial Gut Environment of Two Probiotic Formulations
The quality control of probiotic products is the focus of numerous organizations worldwide. Several studies have highlighted the poor microbiological quality of many commercial probiotic formulations in terms of the identity of the contained microorganisms, viability, and purity, thus precluding the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8617924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34829062 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10112781 |
_version_ | 1784604623830515712 |
---|---|
author | Mazzantini, Diletta Celandroni, Francesco Calvigioni, Marco Panattoni, Adelaide Labella, Roberto Ghelardi, Emilia |
author_facet | Mazzantini, Diletta Celandroni, Francesco Calvigioni, Marco Panattoni, Adelaide Labella, Roberto Ghelardi, Emilia |
author_sort | Mazzantini, Diletta |
collection | PubMed |
description | The quality control of probiotic products is the focus of numerous organizations worldwide. Several studies have highlighted the poor microbiological quality of many commercial probiotic formulations in terms of the identity of the contained microorganisms, viability, and purity, thus precluding the expected health benefits and representing a potential health risk for consumers. In this paper, we analyzed the contents of two probiotic formulations, one composed of an encapsulated mixture of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria, and one by a lyophilized yeast. The microorganisms contained in the products were quantified and identified using up-to-date methodologies, such as MALDI-TOF MS and metagenomic analysis. Moreover, as acid and bile tolerance is included among the criteria used to select probiotic microorganisms, in vitro tests were performed to evaluate the behavior of the formulations in conditions mimicking the harsh gastric environment and the intestinal fluids. Our results indicate the high quality of the formulations in terms of the enumeration and identification of the contained organisms, as well as the absence of contaminants. Moreover, both products tolerated the acidic conditions well, with encapsulation providing further protection for the microorganisms. A good tolerance to the simulated artificial intestinal conditions was also evidenced for both preparations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8617924 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86179242021-11-27 Microbiological Quality and Resistance to an Artificial Gut Environment of Two Probiotic Formulations Mazzantini, Diletta Celandroni, Francesco Calvigioni, Marco Panattoni, Adelaide Labella, Roberto Ghelardi, Emilia Foods Article The quality control of probiotic products is the focus of numerous organizations worldwide. Several studies have highlighted the poor microbiological quality of many commercial probiotic formulations in terms of the identity of the contained microorganisms, viability, and purity, thus precluding the expected health benefits and representing a potential health risk for consumers. In this paper, we analyzed the contents of two probiotic formulations, one composed of an encapsulated mixture of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria, and one by a lyophilized yeast. The microorganisms contained in the products were quantified and identified using up-to-date methodologies, such as MALDI-TOF MS and metagenomic analysis. Moreover, as acid and bile tolerance is included among the criteria used to select probiotic microorganisms, in vitro tests were performed to evaluate the behavior of the formulations in conditions mimicking the harsh gastric environment and the intestinal fluids. Our results indicate the high quality of the formulations in terms of the enumeration and identification of the contained organisms, as well as the absence of contaminants. Moreover, both products tolerated the acidic conditions well, with encapsulation providing further protection for the microorganisms. A good tolerance to the simulated artificial intestinal conditions was also evidenced for both preparations. MDPI 2021-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8617924/ /pubmed/34829062 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10112781 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Mazzantini, Diletta Celandroni, Francesco Calvigioni, Marco Panattoni, Adelaide Labella, Roberto Ghelardi, Emilia Microbiological Quality and Resistance to an Artificial Gut Environment of Two Probiotic Formulations |
title | Microbiological Quality and Resistance to an Artificial Gut Environment of Two Probiotic Formulations |
title_full | Microbiological Quality and Resistance to an Artificial Gut Environment of Two Probiotic Formulations |
title_fullStr | Microbiological Quality and Resistance to an Artificial Gut Environment of Two Probiotic Formulations |
title_full_unstemmed | Microbiological Quality and Resistance to an Artificial Gut Environment of Two Probiotic Formulations |
title_short | Microbiological Quality and Resistance to an Artificial Gut Environment of Two Probiotic Formulations |
title_sort | microbiological quality and resistance to an artificial gut environment of two probiotic formulations |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8617924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34829062 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10112781 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mazzantinidiletta microbiologicalqualityandresistancetoanartificialgutenvironmentoftwoprobioticformulations AT celandronifrancesco microbiologicalqualityandresistancetoanartificialgutenvironmentoftwoprobioticformulations AT calvigionimarco microbiologicalqualityandresistancetoanartificialgutenvironmentoftwoprobioticformulations AT panattoniadelaide microbiologicalqualityandresistancetoanartificialgutenvironmentoftwoprobioticformulations AT labellaroberto microbiologicalqualityandresistancetoanartificialgutenvironmentoftwoprobioticformulations AT ghelardiemilia microbiologicalqualityandresistancetoanartificialgutenvironmentoftwoprobioticformulations |