Cargando…

The Personal Food Systems of Pre-Season NCAA Division 1 High-Contact, Low-Contact, and Non-Contact College Athletes

Previous research indicates that dietary habits may differ between athletes of different sports. In this cross-sectional study, we hypothesize meal frequency, food choices, and food preferences will significantly differ between contact types. The participants were athletes (n = 92; men: n = 57, body...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peluso, Jennifer, Madzima, Takudzwa A., Christopher, Shefali, Nepocatych, Svetlana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8623026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34835926
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13113670
_version_ 1784605832895266816
author Peluso, Jennifer
Madzima, Takudzwa A.
Christopher, Shefali
Nepocatych, Svetlana
author_facet Peluso, Jennifer
Madzima, Takudzwa A.
Christopher, Shefali
Nepocatych, Svetlana
author_sort Peluso, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description Previous research indicates that dietary habits may differ between athletes of different sports. In this cross-sectional study, we hypothesize meal frequency, food choices, and food preferences will significantly differ between contact types. The participants were athletes (n = 92; men: n = 57, body fat percent (BF%): 14.8 ± 8.4%, body mass index (BMI): 25.5 ± 5.5 kg·m(−2); women: n = 36, BF%: 26.7 ± 7.3%, BMI: 22.3 ± 2.7 kg·m(−2)) from high-contact (HCS), low-contact (LCS), and non-contact (NCS) sports. Meal frequency, food preference, and food choice questionnaires assessed factors influencing dietary habits. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measured lean body mass, fat mass, and body fat. A GLM multivariate analysis was used with significance accepted at p < 0.05. Significant body composition differences were observed between genders (p < 0.001) and among sports (p < 0.001). Dinner (83.7%), lunch (67.4%), and breakfast (55.4%) were the most frequently eaten meals, followed by evening snack (17.8%), afternoon snack (15.2%), and morning snack (8.7%). Greater preferences for starches were observed for HCS (p = 0.04; η(2) = 0.07) and for a greater preference for vegetables was found for NCS (p = 0.02; η(2) = 0.09). Significant differences also existed in the importance of health (p = 0.04; η(2) = 0.07), weight control (p = 0.05; η(2) = 0.11), natural content (p = 0.04; η(2) = 0.07), and price (p = 0.04; η(2) = 0.07). These results support our hypothesis that food choices and food preferences differ between contact types. This may help sports dieticians create more individualized nutrition programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8623026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86230262021-11-27 The Personal Food Systems of Pre-Season NCAA Division 1 High-Contact, Low-Contact, and Non-Contact College Athletes Peluso, Jennifer Madzima, Takudzwa A. Christopher, Shefali Nepocatych, Svetlana Nutrients Article Previous research indicates that dietary habits may differ between athletes of different sports. In this cross-sectional study, we hypothesize meal frequency, food choices, and food preferences will significantly differ between contact types. The participants were athletes (n = 92; men: n = 57, body fat percent (BF%): 14.8 ± 8.4%, body mass index (BMI): 25.5 ± 5.5 kg·m(−2); women: n = 36, BF%: 26.7 ± 7.3%, BMI: 22.3 ± 2.7 kg·m(−2)) from high-contact (HCS), low-contact (LCS), and non-contact (NCS) sports. Meal frequency, food preference, and food choice questionnaires assessed factors influencing dietary habits. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measured lean body mass, fat mass, and body fat. A GLM multivariate analysis was used with significance accepted at p < 0.05. Significant body composition differences were observed between genders (p < 0.001) and among sports (p < 0.001). Dinner (83.7%), lunch (67.4%), and breakfast (55.4%) were the most frequently eaten meals, followed by evening snack (17.8%), afternoon snack (15.2%), and morning snack (8.7%). Greater preferences for starches were observed for HCS (p = 0.04; η(2) = 0.07) and for a greater preference for vegetables was found for NCS (p = 0.02; η(2) = 0.09). Significant differences also existed in the importance of health (p = 0.04; η(2) = 0.07), weight control (p = 0.05; η(2) = 0.11), natural content (p = 0.04; η(2) = 0.07), and price (p = 0.04; η(2) = 0.07). These results support our hypothesis that food choices and food preferences differ between contact types. This may help sports dieticians create more individualized nutrition programs. MDPI 2021-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8623026/ /pubmed/34835926 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13113670 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Peluso, Jennifer
Madzima, Takudzwa A.
Christopher, Shefali
Nepocatych, Svetlana
The Personal Food Systems of Pre-Season NCAA Division 1 High-Contact, Low-Contact, and Non-Contact College Athletes
title The Personal Food Systems of Pre-Season NCAA Division 1 High-Contact, Low-Contact, and Non-Contact College Athletes
title_full The Personal Food Systems of Pre-Season NCAA Division 1 High-Contact, Low-Contact, and Non-Contact College Athletes
title_fullStr The Personal Food Systems of Pre-Season NCAA Division 1 High-Contact, Low-Contact, and Non-Contact College Athletes
title_full_unstemmed The Personal Food Systems of Pre-Season NCAA Division 1 High-Contact, Low-Contact, and Non-Contact College Athletes
title_short The Personal Food Systems of Pre-Season NCAA Division 1 High-Contact, Low-Contact, and Non-Contact College Athletes
title_sort personal food systems of pre-season ncaa division 1 high-contact, low-contact, and non-contact college athletes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8623026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34835926
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13113670
work_keys_str_mv AT pelusojennifer thepersonalfoodsystemsofpreseasonncaadivision1highcontactlowcontactandnoncontactcollegeathletes
AT madzimatakudzwaa thepersonalfoodsystemsofpreseasonncaadivision1highcontactlowcontactandnoncontactcollegeathletes
AT christophershefali thepersonalfoodsystemsofpreseasonncaadivision1highcontactlowcontactandnoncontactcollegeathletes
AT nepocatychsvetlana thepersonalfoodsystemsofpreseasonncaadivision1highcontactlowcontactandnoncontactcollegeathletes
AT pelusojennifer personalfoodsystemsofpreseasonncaadivision1highcontactlowcontactandnoncontactcollegeathletes
AT madzimatakudzwaa personalfoodsystemsofpreseasonncaadivision1highcontactlowcontactandnoncontactcollegeathletes
AT christophershefali personalfoodsystemsofpreseasonncaadivision1highcontactlowcontactandnoncontactcollegeathletes
AT nepocatychsvetlana personalfoodsystemsofpreseasonncaadivision1highcontactlowcontactandnoncontactcollegeathletes