Cargando…

Brazilian Consumers’ Attitudes towards So-Called “Cell-Based Meat”

The main goal of this online survey was to investigate the attitudes of Brazilians towards “cell-based meat”, which has become the subject of great scientific and media enthusiasm. The answers of 4471 respondents concluded that 46.6% of them thought “cell-based meat” was promising and acceptable. Mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chriki, Sghaier, Payet, Vincent, Pflanzer, Sérgio Bertelli, Ellies-Oury, Marie-Pierre, Liu, Jingjing, Hocquette, Élise, Rezende-de-Souza, Jonatã Henrique, Hocquette, Jean-François
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8625506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34828869
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10112588
_version_ 1784606437860704256
author Chriki, Sghaier
Payet, Vincent
Pflanzer, Sérgio Bertelli
Ellies-Oury, Marie-Pierre
Liu, Jingjing
Hocquette, Élise
Rezende-de-Souza, Jonatã Henrique
Hocquette, Jean-François
author_facet Chriki, Sghaier
Payet, Vincent
Pflanzer, Sérgio Bertelli
Ellies-Oury, Marie-Pierre
Liu, Jingjing
Hocquette, Élise
Rezende-de-Souza, Jonatã Henrique
Hocquette, Jean-François
author_sort Chriki, Sghaier
collection PubMed
description The main goal of this online survey was to investigate the attitudes of Brazilians towards “cell-based meat”, which has become the subject of great scientific and media enthusiasm. The answers of 4471 respondents concluded that 46.6% of them thought “cell-based meat” was promising and acceptable. More than 66% would be willing to try this novel product compared to 23% who expressed reluctance to do so. Nearly 40% of the total respondents did not want to eat “cell-based meat” regularly at all, whereas 29%, 43.2%, and 39.9% were willing to eat it regularly in restaurants, at home, and/or in ready-made meals, respectively. However, the majority of respondents (71%) were keen to pay much less for “cell-based meat” than conventionally produced meat (or even nothing at all), compared to 24.3% who were willing to pay the same price as conventional meat, whereas only 4.8% were willing to pay more. Approximately 51% of them considered that “cell-based meat” should not be called “meat” for marketing purposes. Job, monthly income, age, and gender were major factors impacting consumer acceptance. Meat professionals and consumers with higher incomes were less willing to eat “cell-based meat” regularly. Women (especially younger women) were the most concerned about the ethical and environmental issues related to meat production and were the most convinced that reducing meat consumption could be a good solution to the meat industry’s problems. Respondents who did not accept “cell-based meat” and did not eat meat substitutes had a negative attitude to this novel food (they considered it absurd and/or disgusting) and did not believe that “cell-based meat” should be called “meat” for marketing purposes. In contrast, the people who thought that “cell-based meat” could be called “meat” perceived it in a rather positive way. These results are important for consumers of meat and meat substitutes and for companies aiming to enter the potential future Brazilian market of “cell-based meat”.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8625506
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86255062021-11-27 Brazilian Consumers’ Attitudes towards So-Called “Cell-Based Meat” Chriki, Sghaier Payet, Vincent Pflanzer, Sérgio Bertelli Ellies-Oury, Marie-Pierre Liu, Jingjing Hocquette, Élise Rezende-de-Souza, Jonatã Henrique Hocquette, Jean-François Foods Article The main goal of this online survey was to investigate the attitudes of Brazilians towards “cell-based meat”, which has become the subject of great scientific and media enthusiasm. The answers of 4471 respondents concluded that 46.6% of them thought “cell-based meat” was promising and acceptable. More than 66% would be willing to try this novel product compared to 23% who expressed reluctance to do so. Nearly 40% of the total respondents did not want to eat “cell-based meat” regularly at all, whereas 29%, 43.2%, and 39.9% were willing to eat it regularly in restaurants, at home, and/or in ready-made meals, respectively. However, the majority of respondents (71%) were keen to pay much less for “cell-based meat” than conventionally produced meat (or even nothing at all), compared to 24.3% who were willing to pay the same price as conventional meat, whereas only 4.8% were willing to pay more. Approximately 51% of them considered that “cell-based meat” should not be called “meat” for marketing purposes. Job, monthly income, age, and gender were major factors impacting consumer acceptance. Meat professionals and consumers with higher incomes were less willing to eat “cell-based meat” regularly. Women (especially younger women) were the most concerned about the ethical and environmental issues related to meat production and were the most convinced that reducing meat consumption could be a good solution to the meat industry’s problems. Respondents who did not accept “cell-based meat” and did not eat meat substitutes had a negative attitude to this novel food (they considered it absurd and/or disgusting) and did not believe that “cell-based meat” should be called “meat” for marketing purposes. In contrast, the people who thought that “cell-based meat” could be called “meat” perceived it in a rather positive way. These results are important for consumers of meat and meat substitutes and for companies aiming to enter the potential future Brazilian market of “cell-based meat”. MDPI 2021-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8625506/ /pubmed/34828869 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10112588 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chriki, Sghaier
Payet, Vincent
Pflanzer, Sérgio Bertelli
Ellies-Oury, Marie-Pierre
Liu, Jingjing
Hocquette, Élise
Rezende-de-Souza, Jonatã Henrique
Hocquette, Jean-François
Brazilian Consumers’ Attitudes towards So-Called “Cell-Based Meat”
title Brazilian Consumers’ Attitudes towards So-Called “Cell-Based Meat”
title_full Brazilian Consumers’ Attitudes towards So-Called “Cell-Based Meat”
title_fullStr Brazilian Consumers’ Attitudes towards So-Called “Cell-Based Meat”
title_full_unstemmed Brazilian Consumers’ Attitudes towards So-Called “Cell-Based Meat”
title_short Brazilian Consumers’ Attitudes towards So-Called “Cell-Based Meat”
title_sort brazilian consumers’ attitudes towards so-called “cell-based meat”
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8625506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34828869
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10112588
work_keys_str_mv AT chrikisghaier brazilianconsumersattitudestowardssocalledcellbasedmeat
AT payetvincent brazilianconsumersattitudestowardssocalledcellbasedmeat
AT pflanzersergiobertelli brazilianconsumersattitudestowardssocalledcellbasedmeat
AT elliesourymariepierre brazilianconsumersattitudestowardssocalledcellbasedmeat
AT liujingjing brazilianconsumersattitudestowardssocalledcellbasedmeat
AT hocquetteelise brazilianconsumersattitudestowardssocalledcellbasedmeat
AT rezendedesouzajonatahenrique brazilianconsumersattitudestowardssocalledcellbasedmeat
AT hocquettejeanfrancois brazilianconsumersattitudestowardssocalledcellbasedmeat