_version_ 1784607394984099840
author Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Castle, Laurence
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul
Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
Fürst, Peter
Gürtler, Rainer
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Husøy, Trine
Manco, Melania
Mennes, Wim
Passamonti, Sabina
Moldeus, Peter
Shah, Romina
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Wölfle, Detlef
Wright, Matthew
Batke, Monika
Boon, Polly
Bruzell, Ellen
Chipman, James
Crebelli, Riccardo
Fitzgerald, Rex
Fortes, Cristina
Halldorsson, Thorhallur
LeBlanc, Jean‐Charles
Lindtner, Oliver
Mortensen, Alicja
Ntzani, Evangelia
Wallace, Heather
Civitella, Consuelo
Horvath, Zsuzsanna
Lodi, Federica
Tard, Alexandra
Vianello, Giorgia
author_facet Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Castle, Laurence
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul
Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
Fürst, Peter
Gürtler, Rainer
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Husøy, Trine
Manco, Melania
Mennes, Wim
Passamonti, Sabina
Moldeus, Peter
Shah, Romina
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Wölfle, Detlef
Wright, Matthew
Batke, Monika
Boon, Polly
Bruzell, Ellen
Chipman, James
Crebelli, Riccardo
Fitzgerald, Rex
Fortes, Cristina
Halldorsson, Thorhallur
LeBlanc, Jean‐Charles
Lindtner, Oliver
Mortensen, Alicja
Ntzani, Evangelia
Wallace, Heather
Civitella, Consuelo
Horvath, Zsuzsanna
Lodi, Federica
Tard, Alexandra
Vianello, Giorgia
collection PubMed
description The present opinion deals with the re‐evaluation of thaumatin (E 957) when used as a food additive. Thaumatin is a natural plant protein, consisting of thaumatin I and thaumatin II proteins together with minor amounts of plant constituents, obtained by acidic aqueous extraction of the arils of the fruit of Thaumatococcus daniellii plant. The Panel followed the conceptual framework for the risk assessment of certain food additives and considered that thaumatin is a digestible protein; adequate exposure estimates were available; there was no concern with respect to the genotoxicity; no conclusion on oral allergenicity could be drawn from the available human data; no adverse effects were observed in sub‐chronic toxicity studies in rats and dogs at the highest dose tested of up 5,200 and 1,476 mg/kg bodyweight (bw) per day, respectively, and in a prenatal developmental toxicity study up to 2,000 mg/kg bw per day; moderate confidence in the body of evidence supported the absence of association between exposure to thaumatin and adverse health outcomes. Therefore, the Panel concluded that there is no need for a numerical acceptable daily intake (ADI) for thaumatin (E 957) and, based on a margin of safety (MOS) of 5,417, considered to be an underestimate and derived using the highest 95th percentile (P95) exposure of 0.48 mg/kg bw per day in consumers only, there is no safety concern for thaumatin (E 957) at the regulatory maximum level exposure assessment scenario, which was considered the most appropriate. The Panel recommended that European Commission considers introducing in the EU specifications for thaumatin (E 957) a new specification limit for the minimum combined content of thaumatin I and II proteins in E 957, a specification limit for yeast, mould counts and Salmonella spp and lowering the existing maximum limit for arsenic along with the inclusion of maximum limits for mercury and cadmium.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8630604
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86306042021-12-06 Re‐evaluation of thaumatin (E 957) as food additive Younes, Maged Aquilina, Gabriele Castle, Laurence Engel, Karl‐Heinz Fowler, Paul Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose Fürst, Peter Gürtler, Rainer Gundert‐Remy, Ursula Husøy, Trine Manco, Melania Mennes, Wim Passamonti, Sabina Moldeus, Peter Shah, Romina Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine Wölfle, Detlef Wright, Matthew Batke, Monika Boon, Polly Bruzell, Ellen Chipman, James Crebelli, Riccardo Fitzgerald, Rex Fortes, Cristina Halldorsson, Thorhallur LeBlanc, Jean‐Charles Lindtner, Oliver Mortensen, Alicja Ntzani, Evangelia Wallace, Heather Civitella, Consuelo Horvath, Zsuzsanna Lodi, Federica Tard, Alexandra Vianello, Giorgia EFSA J Scientific Opinion The present opinion deals with the re‐evaluation of thaumatin (E 957) when used as a food additive. Thaumatin is a natural plant protein, consisting of thaumatin I and thaumatin II proteins together with minor amounts of plant constituents, obtained by acidic aqueous extraction of the arils of the fruit of Thaumatococcus daniellii plant. The Panel followed the conceptual framework for the risk assessment of certain food additives and considered that thaumatin is a digestible protein; adequate exposure estimates were available; there was no concern with respect to the genotoxicity; no conclusion on oral allergenicity could be drawn from the available human data; no adverse effects were observed in sub‐chronic toxicity studies in rats and dogs at the highest dose tested of up 5,200 and 1,476 mg/kg bodyweight (bw) per day, respectively, and in a prenatal developmental toxicity study up to 2,000 mg/kg bw per day; moderate confidence in the body of evidence supported the absence of association between exposure to thaumatin and adverse health outcomes. Therefore, the Panel concluded that there is no need for a numerical acceptable daily intake (ADI) for thaumatin (E 957) and, based on a margin of safety (MOS) of 5,417, considered to be an underestimate and derived using the highest 95th percentile (P95) exposure of 0.48 mg/kg bw per day in consumers only, there is no safety concern for thaumatin (E 957) at the regulatory maximum level exposure assessment scenario, which was considered the most appropriate. The Panel recommended that European Commission considers introducing in the EU specifications for thaumatin (E 957) a new specification limit for the minimum combined content of thaumatin I and II proteins in E 957, a specification limit for yeast, mould counts and Salmonella spp and lowering the existing maximum limit for arsenic along with the inclusion of maximum limits for mercury and cadmium. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8630604/ /pubmed/34876926 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6884 Text en © 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Younes, Maged
Aquilina, Gabriele
Castle, Laurence
Engel, Karl‐Heinz
Fowler, Paul
Frutos Fernandez, Maria Jose
Fürst, Peter
Gürtler, Rainer
Gundert‐Remy, Ursula
Husøy, Trine
Manco, Melania
Mennes, Wim
Passamonti, Sabina
Moldeus, Peter
Shah, Romina
Waalkens‐Berendsen, Ine
Wölfle, Detlef
Wright, Matthew
Batke, Monika
Boon, Polly
Bruzell, Ellen
Chipman, James
Crebelli, Riccardo
Fitzgerald, Rex
Fortes, Cristina
Halldorsson, Thorhallur
LeBlanc, Jean‐Charles
Lindtner, Oliver
Mortensen, Alicja
Ntzani, Evangelia
Wallace, Heather
Civitella, Consuelo
Horvath, Zsuzsanna
Lodi, Federica
Tard, Alexandra
Vianello, Giorgia
Re‐evaluation of thaumatin (E 957) as food additive
title Re‐evaluation of thaumatin (E 957) as food additive
title_full Re‐evaluation of thaumatin (E 957) as food additive
title_fullStr Re‐evaluation of thaumatin (E 957) as food additive
title_full_unstemmed Re‐evaluation of thaumatin (E 957) as food additive
title_short Re‐evaluation of thaumatin (E 957) as food additive
title_sort re‐evaluation of thaumatin (e 957) as food additive
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8630604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34876926
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6884
work_keys_str_mv AT reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT younesmaged reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT aquilinagabriele reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT castlelaurence reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT engelkarlheinz reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT fowlerpaul reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT frutosfernandezmariajose reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT furstpeter reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT gurtlerrainer reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT gundertremyursula reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT husøytrine reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT mancomelania reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT menneswim reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT passamontisabina reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT moldeuspeter reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT shahromina reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT waalkensberendsenine reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT wolfledetlef reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT wrightmatthew reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT batkemonika reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT boonpolly reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT bruzellellen reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT chipmanjames reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT crebelliriccardo reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT fitzgeraldrex reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT fortescristina reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT halldorssonthorhallur reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT leblancjeancharles reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT lindtneroliver reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT mortensenalicja reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT ntzanievangelia reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT wallaceheather reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT civitellaconsuelo reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT horvathzsuzsanna reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT lodifederica reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT tardalexandra reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive
AT vianellogiorgia reevaluationofthaumatine957asfoodadditive