Cargando…

Engagement and learning in an electronic spaced repetition curriculum companion for a paediatrics academic half-day curriculum

Postgraduate residencies utilize academic half-days to supplement clinical learning. Spaced repetition reinforces taught content to improve retention. We leveraged spaced repetition in a curriculum companion for a paediatric residency program’s half-day. One half-day lecture was chosen weekly for re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McConnery, Jason R., Bassilious, Ereny, Ngo, Quang N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8633189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34519019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-021-00680-x
_version_ 1784607881422700544
author McConnery, Jason R.
Bassilious, Ereny
Ngo, Quang N.
author_facet McConnery, Jason R.
Bassilious, Ereny
Ngo, Quang N.
author_sort McConnery, Jason R.
collection PubMed
description Postgraduate residencies utilize academic half-days to supplement clinical learning. Spaced repetition reinforces taught content to improve retention. We leveraged spaced repetition in a curriculum companion for a paediatric residency program’s half-day. One half-day lecture was chosen weekly for reinforcement (day 0). Participants received 3 key points on day 1 and a multiple-choice question (MCQ) on day 8. On day 29, they received two MCQs to test reinforced and unreinforced content from the same day 0. Thirty-one (79%) residents participated over 17 weeks, but only 14 (36%) completed more than half of the weekly quizzes. Of all quizzes, 37.4% were completed, with an average weekly engagement of 5.5 minutes. Helpfulness to learning was rated as 7.89/10 on a Likert-like scale. Reported barriers were missing related half-days and emails, or limited time. There was no significant difference in performance between reinforced (63.4%, [53.6–73.3]) and unreinforced (65.6%, [53.7–73.2]) questions. Spaced repetition is a proven strategy in learning science, but was not shown to improve performance. Operational barriers likely limited participation and underpowered our analysis, therefore future implementation must consider practical and individual barriers to facilitate success. Our results also illustrate that satisfaction alone is an inadequate marker of success. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40037-021-00680-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8633189
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86331892021-12-15 Engagement and learning in an electronic spaced repetition curriculum companion for a paediatrics academic half-day curriculum McConnery, Jason R. Bassilious, Ereny Ngo, Quang N. Perspect Med Educ Failures/Surprises Postgraduate residencies utilize academic half-days to supplement clinical learning. Spaced repetition reinforces taught content to improve retention. We leveraged spaced repetition in a curriculum companion for a paediatric residency program’s half-day. One half-day lecture was chosen weekly for reinforcement (day 0). Participants received 3 key points on day 1 and a multiple-choice question (MCQ) on day 8. On day 29, they received two MCQs to test reinforced and unreinforced content from the same day 0. Thirty-one (79%) residents participated over 17 weeks, but only 14 (36%) completed more than half of the weekly quizzes. Of all quizzes, 37.4% were completed, with an average weekly engagement of 5.5 minutes. Helpfulness to learning was rated as 7.89/10 on a Likert-like scale. Reported barriers were missing related half-days and emails, or limited time. There was no significant difference in performance between reinforced (63.4%, [53.6–73.3]) and unreinforced (65.6%, [53.7–73.2]) questions. Spaced repetition is a proven strategy in learning science, but was not shown to improve performance. Operational barriers likely limited participation and underpowered our analysis, therefore future implementation must consider practical and individual barriers to facilitate success. Our results also illustrate that satisfaction alone is an inadequate marker of success. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40037-021-00680-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2021-09-13 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8633189/ /pubmed/34519019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-021-00680-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Failures/Surprises
McConnery, Jason R.
Bassilious, Ereny
Ngo, Quang N.
Engagement and learning in an electronic spaced repetition curriculum companion for a paediatrics academic half-day curriculum
title Engagement and learning in an electronic spaced repetition curriculum companion for a paediatrics academic half-day curriculum
title_full Engagement and learning in an electronic spaced repetition curriculum companion for a paediatrics academic half-day curriculum
title_fullStr Engagement and learning in an electronic spaced repetition curriculum companion for a paediatrics academic half-day curriculum
title_full_unstemmed Engagement and learning in an electronic spaced repetition curriculum companion for a paediatrics academic half-day curriculum
title_short Engagement and learning in an electronic spaced repetition curriculum companion for a paediatrics academic half-day curriculum
title_sort engagement and learning in an electronic spaced repetition curriculum companion for a paediatrics academic half-day curriculum
topic Failures/Surprises
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8633189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34519019
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-021-00680-x
work_keys_str_mv AT mcconneryjasonr engagementandlearninginanelectronicspacedrepetitioncurriculumcompanionforapaediatricsacademichalfdaycurriculum
AT bassiliousereny engagementandlearninginanelectronicspacedrepetitioncurriculumcompanionforapaediatricsacademichalfdaycurriculum
AT ngoquangn engagementandlearninginanelectronicspacedrepetitioncurriculumcompanionforapaediatricsacademichalfdaycurriculum