Cargando…
Engagement and learning in an electronic spaced repetition curriculum companion for a paediatrics academic half-day curriculum
Postgraduate residencies utilize academic half-days to supplement clinical learning. Spaced repetition reinforces taught content to improve retention. We leveraged spaced repetition in a curriculum companion for a paediatric residency program’s half-day. One half-day lecture was chosen weekly for re...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8633189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34519019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-021-00680-x |
_version_ | 1784607881422700544 |
---|---|
author | McConnery, Jason R. Bassilious, Ereny Ngo, Quang N. |
author_facet | McConnery, Jason R. Bassilious, Ereny Ngo, Quang N. |
author_sort | McConnery, Jason R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Postgraduate residencies utilize academic half-days to supplement clinical learning. Spaced repetition reinforces taught content to improve retention. We leveraged spaced repetition in a curriculum companion for a paediatric residency program’s half-day. One half-day lecture was chosen weekly for reinforcement (day 0). Participants received 3 key points on day 1 and a multiple-choice question (MCQ) on day 8. On day 29, they received two MCQs to test reinforced and unreinforced content from the same day 0. Thirty-one (79%) residents participated over 17 weeks, but only 14 (36%) completed more than half of the weekly quizzes. Of all quizzes, 37.4% were completed, with an average weekly engagement of 5.5 minutes. Helpfulness to learning was rated as 7.89/10 on a Likert-like scale. Reported barriers were missing related half-days and emails, or limited time. There was no significant difference in performance between reinforced (63.4%, [53.6–73.3]) and unreinforced (65.6%, [53.7–73.2]) questions. Spaced repetition is a proven strategy in learning science, but was not shown to improve performance. Operational barriers likely limited participation and underpowered our analysis, therefore future implementation must consider practical and individual barriers to facilitate success. Our results also illustrate that satisfaction alone is an inadequate marker of success. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40037-021-00680-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8633189 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Bohn Stafleu van Loghum |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86331892021-12-15 Engagement and learning in an electronic spaced repetition curriculum companion for a paediatrics academic half-day curriculum McConnery, Jason R. Bassilious, Ereny Ngo, Quang N. Perspect Med Educ Failures/Surprises Postgraduate residencies utilize academic half-days to supplement clinical learning. Spaced repetition reinforces taught content to improve retention. We leveraged spaced repetition in a curriculum companion for a paediatric residency program’s half-day. One half-day lecture was chosen weekly for reinforcement (day 0). Participants received 3 key points on day 1 and a multiple-choice question (MCQ) on day 8. On day 29, they received two MCQs to test reinforced and unreinforced content from the same day 0. Thirty-one (79%) residents participated over 17 weeks, but only 14 (36%) completed more than half of the weekly quizzes. Of all quizzes, 37.4% were completed, with an average weekly engagement of 5.5 minutes. Helpfulness to learning was rated as 7.89/10 on a Likert-like scale. Reported barriers were missing related half-days and emails, or limited time. There was no significant difference in performance between reinforced (63.4%, [53.6–73.3]) and unreinforced (65.6%, [53.7–73.2]) questions. Spaced repetition is a proven strategy in learning science, but was not shown to improve performance. Operational barriers likely limited participation and underpowered our analysis, therefore future implementation must consider practical and individual barriers to facilitate success. Our results also illustrate that satisfaction alone is an inadequate marker of success. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40037-021-00680-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2021-09-13 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8633189/ /pubmed/34519019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-021-00680-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Failures/Surprises McConnery, Jason R. Bassilious, Ereny Ngo, Quang N. Engagement and learning in an electronic spaced repetition curriculum companion for a paediatrics academic half-day curriculum |
title | Engagement and learning in an electronic spaced repetition curriculum companion for a paediatrics academic half-day curriculum |
title_full | Engagement and learning in an electronic spaced repetition curriculum companion for a paediatrics academic half-day curriculum |
title_fullStr | Engagement and learning in an electronic spaced repetition curriculum companion for a paediatrics academic half-day curriculum |
title_full_unstemmed | Engagement and learning in an electronic spaced repetition curriculum companion for a paediatrics academic half-day curriculum |
title_short | Engagement and learning in an electronic spaced repetition curriculum companion for a paediatrics academic half-day curriculum |
title_sort | engagement and learning in an electronic spaced repetition curriculum companion for a paediatrics academic half-day curriculum |
topic | Failures/Surprises |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8633189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34519019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-021-00680-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcconneryjasonr engagementandlearninginanelectronicspacedrepetitioncurriculumcompanionforapaediatricsacademichalfdaycurriculum AT bassiliousereny engagementandlearninginanelectronicspacedrepetitioncurriculumcompanionforapaediatricsacademichalfdaycurriculum AT ngoquangn engagementandlearninginanelectronicspacedrepetitioncurriculumcompanionforapaediatricsacademichalfdaycurriculum |