Cargando…
Inactivation of indicator microorganisms and biological hazards by standard and/or alternative processing methods in Category 2 and 3 animal by‐products and derived products to be used as organic fertilisers and/or soil improvers
The European Commission requested EFSA to assess if different thermal processes achieve a 5 log(10) reduction in Enterococcus faecalis or Salmonella Senftenberg (775W) and (if relevant) a 3 log(10) reduction in thermoresistant viruses (e.g. Parvovirus) as well as if different chemical processes achi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8638561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34900004 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6932 |
_version_ | 1784608964739072000 |
---|---|
author | Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos Allende, Ana Bolton, Declan Bover‐Cid, Sara Chemaly, Marianne Davies, Robert De Cesare, Alessandra Herman, Lieve Hilbert, Friederike Lindqvist, Roland Nauta, Maarten Peixe, Luisa Ru, Giuseppe Simmons, Marion Skandamis, Panagiotis Suffredini, Elisabetta Bottari, Benedetta Cummins, Enda Ylivainio, Kari Muñoz Guajardo, Irene Ortiz‐Pelaez, Angel Alvarez‐Ordóñez, Avelino |
author_facet | Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos Allende, Ana Bolton, Declan Bover‐Cid, Sara Chemaly, Marianne Davies, Robert De Cesare, Alessandra Herman, Lieve Hilbert, Friederike Lindqvist, Roland Nauta, Maarten Peixe, Luisa Ru, Giuseppe Simmons, Marion Skandamis, Panagiotis Suffredini, Elisabetta Bottari, Benedetta Cummins, Enda Ylivainio, Kari Muñoz Guajardo, Irene Ortiz‐Pelaez, Angel Alvarez‐Ordóñez, Avelino |
collection | PubMed |
description | The European Commission requested EFSA to assess if different thermal processes achieve a 5 log(10) reduction in Enterococcus faecalis or Salmonella Senftenberg (775W) and (if relevant) a 3 log(10) reduction in thermoresistant viruses (e.g. Parvovirus) as well as if different chemical processes achieve a 3 log(10) reduction of eggs of Ascaris sp., in eight groups of Category 2 and 3 derived products and animal by‐products (ABP). These included (1) ash derived from incineration, co‐incineration and combustion; (2) glycerine derived from the production of biodiesel and renewable fuels; (3) other materials derived from the production of biodiesel and renewable fuels; (4) hides and skins; (5) wool and hair; (6) feathers and down; (7) pig bristles; and (8) horns, horn products, hooves and hoof products. Data on the presence of viral hazards and on thermal and chemical inactivation of the targeted indicator microorganisms and biological hazards under relevant processing conditions were extracted via extensive literature searches. The evidence was assessed via expert knowledge elicitation. The certainty that the required log(10) reductions in the most resistant indicator microorganisms or biological hazards will be achieved for each of the eight groups of materials mentioned above by the thermal and/or chemical processes was (1) 99–100% for the two processes assessed; (2) 98–100% in Category 2 ABP, at least 90–99% in Category 3 ABP; (3) 90–99% in Category 2 ABP; at least 66–90% in Category 3 ABP; (4) 10–66% and 33–66%; (5) 1–33% and 10–50%; (6) 66–90%; (7) 33–66% and 50–95%; (8) 66–95%, respectively. Data generation on the occurrence and reduction of biological hazards by thermal and/or chemical methods in these materials and on the characterisation of the usage pathways of ABP as organic fertilisers/soil improvers is recommended. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8638561 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86385612021-12-09 Inactivation of indicator microorganisms and biological hazards by standard and/or alternative processing methods in Category 2 and 3 animal by‐products and derived products to be used as organic fertilisers and/or soil improvers Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos Allende, Ana Bolton, Declan Bover‐Cid, Sara Chemaly, Marianne Davies, Robert De Cesare, Alessandra Herman, Lieve Hilbert, Friederike Lindqvist, Roland Nauta, Maarten Peixe, Luisa Ru, Giuseppe Simmons, Marion Skandamis, Panagiotis Suffredini, Elisabetta Bottari, Benedetta Cummins, Enda Ylivainio, Kari Muñoz Guajardo, Irene Ortiz‐Pelaez, Angel Alvarez‐Ordóñez, Avelino EFSA J Scientific Opinion The European Commission requested EFSA to assess if different thermal processes achieve a 5 log(10) reduction in Enterococcus faecalis or Salmonella Senftenberg (775W) and (if relevant) a 3 log(10) reduction in thermoresistant viruses (e.g. Parvovirus) as well as if different chemical processes achieve a 3 log(10) reduction of eggs of Ascaris sp., in eight groups of Category 2 and 3 derived products and animal by‐products (ABP). These included (1) ash derived from incineration, co‐incineration and combustion; (2) glycerine derived from the production of biodiesel and renewable fuels; (3) other materials derived from the production of biodiesel and renewable fuels; (4) hides and skins; (5) wool and hair; (6) feathers and down; (7) pig bristles; and (8) horns, horn products, hooves and hoof products. Data on the presence of viral hazards and on thermal and chemical inactivation of the targeted indicator microorganisms and biological hazards under relevant processing conditions were extracted via extensive literature searches. The evidence was assessed via expert knowledge elicitation. The certainty that the required log(10) reductions in the most resistant indicator microorganisms or biological hazards will be achieved for each of the eight groups of materials mentioned above by the thermal and/or chemical processes was (1) 99–100% for the two processes assessed; (2) 98–100% in Category 2 ABP, at least 90–99% in Category 3 ABP; (3) 90–99% in Category 2 ABP; at least 66–90% in Category 3 ABP; (4) 10–66% and 33–66%; (5) 1–33% and 10–50%; (6) 66–90%; (7) 33–66% and 50–95%; (8) 66–95%, respectively. Data generation on the occurrence and reduction of biological hazards by thermal and/or chemical methods in these materials and on the characterisation of the usage pathways of ABP as organic fertilisers/soil improvers is recommended. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8638561/ /pubmed/34900004 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6932 Text en © 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos Allende, Ana Bolton, Declan Bover‐Cid, Sara Chemaly, Marianne Davies, Robert De Cesare, Alessandra Herman, Lieve Hilbert, Friederike Lindqvist, Roland Nauta, Maarten Peixe, Luisa Ru, Giuseppe Simmons, Marion Skandamis, Panagiotis Suffredini, Elisabetta Bottari, Benedetta Cummins, Enda Ylivainio, Kari Muñoz Guajardo, Irene Ortiz‐Pelaez, Angel Alvarez‐Ordóñez, Avelino Inactivation of indicator microorganisms and biological hazards by standard and/or alternative processing methods in Category 2 and 3 animal by‐products and derived products to be used as organic fertilisers and/or soil improvers |
title | Inactivation of indicator microorganisms and biological hazards by standard and/or alternative processing methods in Category 2 and 3 animal by‐products and derived products to be used as organic fertilisers and/or soil improvers |
title_full | Inactivation of indicator microorganisms and biological hazards by standard and/or alternative processing methods in Category 2 and 3 animal by‐products and derived products to be used as organic fertilisers and/or soil improvers |
title_fullStr | Inactivation of indicator microorganisms and biological hazards by standard and/or alternative processing methods in Category 2 and 3 animal by‐products and derived products to be used as organic fertilisers and/or soil improvers |
title_full_unstemmed | Inactivation of indicator microorganisms and biological hazards by standard and/or alternative processing methods in Category 2 and 3 animal by‐products and derived products to be used as organic fertilisers and/or soil improvers |
title_short | Inactivation of indicator microorganisms and biological hazards by standard and/or alternative processing methods in Category 2 and 3 animal by‐products and derived products to be used as organic fertilisers and/or soil improvers |
title_sort | inactivation of indicator microorganisms and biological hazards by standard and/or alternative processing methods in category 2 and 3 animal by‐products and derived products to be used as organic fertilisers and/or soil improvers |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8638561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34900004 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6932 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT inactivationofindicatormicroorganismsandbiologicalhazardsbystandardandoralternativeprocessingmethodsincategory2and3animalbyproductsandderivedproductstobeusedasorganicfertilisersandorsoilimprovers AT koutsoumaniskonstantinos inactivationofindicatormicroorganismsandbiologicalhazardsbystandardandoralternativeprocessingmethodsincategory2and3animalbyproductsandderivedproductstobeusedasorganicfertilisersandorsoilimprovers AT allendeana inactivationofindicatormicroorganismsandbiologicalhazardsbystandardandoralternativeprocessingmethodsincategory2and3animalbyproductsandderivedproductstobeusedasorganicfertilisersandorsoilimprovers AT boltondeclan inactivationofindicatormicroorganismsandbiologicalhazardsbystandardandoralternativeprocessingmethodsincategory2and3animalbyproductsandderivedproductstobeusedasorganicfertilisersandorsoilimprovers AT bovercidsara inactivationofindicatormicroorganismsandbiologicalhazardsbystandardandoralternativeprocessingmethodsincategory2and3animalbyproductsandderivedproductstobeusedasorganicfertilisersandorsoilimprovers AT chemalymarianne inactivationofindicatormicroorganismsandbiologicalhazardsbystandardandoralternativeprocessingmethodsincategory2and3animalbyproductsandderivedproductstobeusedasorganicfertilisersandorsoilimprovers AT daviesrobert inactivationofindicatormicroorganismsandbiologicalhazardsbystandardandoralternativeprocessingmethodsincategory2and3animalbyproductsandderivedproductstobeusedasorganicfertilisersandorsoilimprovers AT decesarealessandra inactivationofindicatormicroorganismsandbiologicalhazardsbystandardandoralternativeprocessingmethodsincategory2and3animalbyproductsandderivedproductstobeusedasorganicfertilisersandorsoilimprovers AT hermanlieve inactivationofindicatormicroorganismsandbiologicalhazardsbystandardandoralternativeprocessingmethodsincategory2and3animalbyproductsandderivedproductstobeusedasorganicfertilisersandorsoilimprovers AT hilbertfriederike inactivationofindicatormicroorganismsandbiologicalhazardsbystandardandoralternativeprocessingmethodsincategory2and3animalbyproductsandderivedproductstobeusedasorganicfertilisersandorsoilimprovers AT lindqvistroland inactivationofindicatormicroorganismsandbiologicalhazardsbystandardandoralternativeprocessingmethodsincategory2and3animalbyproductsandderivedproductstobeusedasorganicfertilisersandorsoilimprovers AT nautamaarten inactivationofindicatormicroorganismsandbiologicalhazardsbystandardandoralternativeprocessingmethodsincategory2and3animalbyproductsandderivedproductstobeusedasorganicfertilisersandorsoilimprovers AT peixeluisa inactivationofindicatormicroorganismsandbiologicalhazardsbystandardandoralternativeprocessingmethodsincategory2and3animalbyproductsandderivedproductstobeusedasorganicfertilisersandorsoilimprovers AT rugiuseppe inactivationofindicatormicroorganismsandbiologicalhazardsbystandardandoralternativeprocessingmethodsincategory2and3animalbyproductsandderivedproductstobeusedasorganicfertilisersandorsoilimprovers AT simmonsmarion inactivationofindicatormicroorganismsandbiologicalhazardsbystandardandoralternativeprocessingmethodsincategory2and3animalbyproductsandderivedproductstobeusedasorganicfertilisersandorsoilimprovers AT skandamispanagiotis inactivationofindicatormicroorganismsandbiologicalhazardsbystandardandoralternativeprocessingmethodsincategory2and3animalbyproductsandderivedproductstobeusedasorganicfertilisersandorsoilimprovers AT suffredinielisabetta inactivationofindicatormicroorganismsandbiologicalhazardsbystandardandoralternativeprocessingmethodsincategory2and3animalbyproductsandderivedproductstobeusedasorganicfertilisersandorsoilimprovers AT bottaribenedetta inactivationofindicatormicroorganismsandbiologicalhazardsbystandardandoralternativeprocessingmethodsincategory2and3animalbyproductsandderivedproductstobeusedasorganicfertilisersandorsoilimprovers AT cumminsenda inactivationofindicatormicroorganismsandbiologicalhazardsbystandardandoralternativeprocessingmethodsincategory2and3animalbyproductsandderivedproductstobeusedasorganicfertilisersandorsoilimprovers AT ylivainiokari inactivationofindicatormicroorganismsandbiologicalhazardsbystandardandoralternativeprocessingmethodsincategory2and3animalbyproductsandderivedproductstobeusedasorganicfertilisersandorsoilimprovers AT munozguajardoirene inactivationofindicatormicroorganismsandbiologicalhazardsbystandardandoralternativeprocessingmethodsincategory2and3animalbyproductsandderivedproductstobeusedasorganicfertilisersandorsoilimprovers AT ortizpelaezangel inactivationofindicatormicroorganismsandbiologicalhazardsbystandardandoralternativeprocessingmethodsincategory2and3animalbyproductsandderivedproductstobeusedasorganicfertilisersandorsoilimprovers AT alvarezordonezavelino inactivationofindicatormicroorganismsandbiologicalhazardsbystandardandoralternativeprocessingmethodsincategory2and3animalbyproductsandderivedproductstobeusedasorganicfertilisersandorsoilimprovers |