Cargando…

Synergistic and additive interactions between receptor signaling networks drive the regulatory T cell versus T helper 17 cell fate choice

CD4+ T cells differentiate into subsets that promote immunity or minimize damage to the host. T helper 17 cells (Th17) are effector cells that function in inflammatory responses. T regulatory cells (Tregs) maintain tolerance and prevent autoimmunity by secreting immunosuppressive cytokines and expre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prado, Douglas S., Cattley, Richard T., Shipman, Corey W., Happe, Cassandra, Lee, Mijoon, Boggess, William C., MacDonald, Matthew L., Hawse, William F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8645459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34688667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101330
_version_ 1784610309629018112
author Prado, Douglas S.
Cattley, Richard T.
Shipman, Corey W.
Happe, Cassandra
Lee, Mijoon
Boggess, William C.
MacDonald, Matthew L.
Hawse, William F.
author_facet Prado, Douglas S.
Cattley, Richard T.
Shipman, Corey W.
Happe, Cassandra
Lee, Mijoon
Boggess, William C.
MacDonald, Matthew L.
Hawse, William F.
author_sort Prado, Douglas S.
collection PubMed
description CD4+ T cells differentiate into subsets that promote immunity or minimize damage to the host. T helper 17 cells (Th17) are effector cells that function in inflammatory responses. T regulatory cells (Tregs) maintain tolerance and prevent autoimmunity by secreting immunosuppressive cytokines and expressing check point receptors. While the functions of Th17 and Treg cells are different, both cell fate trajectories require T cell receptor (TCR) and TGF-β receptor (TGF-βR) signals, and Th17 polarization requires an additional IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) signal. Utilizing high-resolution phosphoproteomics, we identified that both synergistic and additive interactions between TCR, TGF-βR, and IL-6R shape kinase signaling networks to differentially regulate key pathways during the early phase of Treg versus Th17 induction. Quantitative biochemical analysis revealed that CD4+ T cells integrate receptor signals via SMAD3, which is a mediator of TGF-βR signaling. Treg induction potentiates the formation of the canonical SMAD3/4 trimer to activate a negative feedback loop through kinases PKA and CSK to suppress TCR signaling, phosphatidylinositol metabolism, and mTOR signaling. IL-6R signaling activates STAT3 to bind SMAD3 and block formation of the SMAD3/4 trimer during the early phase of Th17 induction, which leads to elevated TCR and PI3K signaling. These data provide a biochemical mechanism by which CD4+ T cells integrate TCR, TGF-β, and IL-6 signals via generation of alternate SMAD3 complexes that control the development of early signaling networks to potentiate the choice of Treg versus Th17 cell fate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8645459
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86454592021-12-15 Synergistic and additive interactions between receptor signaling networks drive the regulatory T cell versus T helper 17 cell fate choice Prado, Douglas S. Cattley, Richard T. Shipman, Corey W. Happe, Cassandra Lee, Mijoon Boggess, William C. MacDonald, Matthew L. Hawse, William F. J Biol Chem Research Article CD4+ T cells differentiate into subsets that promote immunity or minimize damage to the host. T helper 17 cells (Th17) are effector cells that function in inflammatory responses. T regulatory cells (Tregs) maintain tolerance and prevent autoimmunity by secreting immunosuppressive cytokines and expressing check point receptors. While the functions of Th17 and Treg cells are different, both cell fate trajectories require T cell receptor (TCR) and TGF-β receptor (TGF-βR) signals, and Th17 polarization requires an additional IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) signal. Utilizing high-resolution phosphoproteomics, we identified that both synergistic and additive interactions between TCR, TGF-βR, and IL-6R shape kinase signaling networks to differentially regulate key pathways during the early phase of Treg versus Th17 induction. Quantitative biochemical analysis revealed that CD4+ T cells integrate receptor signals via SMAD3, which is a mediator of TGF-βR signaling. Treg induction potentiates the formation of the canonical SMAD3/4 trimer to activate a negative feedback loop through kinases PKA and CSK to suppress TCR signaling, phosphatidylinositol metabolism, and mTOR signaling. IL-6R signaling activates STAT3 to bind SMAD3 and block formation of the SMAD3/4 trimer during the early phase of Th17 induction, which leads to elevated TCR and PI3K signaling. These data provide a biochemical mechanism by which CD4+ T cells integrate TCR, TGF-β, and IL-6 signals via generation of alternate SMAD3 complexes that control the development of early signaling networks to potentiate the choice of Treg versus Th17 cell fate. American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 2021-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8645459/ /pubmed/34688667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101330 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Prado, Douglas S.
Cattley, Richard T.
Shipman, Corey W.
Happe, Cassandra
Lee, Mijoon
Boggess, William C.
MacDonald, Matthew L.
Hawse, William F.
Synergistic and additive interactions between receptor signaling networks drive the regulatory T cell versus T helper 17 cell fate choice
title Synergistic and additive interactions between receptor signaling networks drive the regulatory T cell versus T helper 17 cell fate choice
title_full Synergistic and additive interactions between receptor signaling networks drive the regulatory T cell versus T helper 17 cell fate choice
title_fullStr Synergistic and additive interactions between receptor signaling networks drive the regulatory T cell versus T helper 17 cell fate choice
title_full_unstemmed Synergistic and additive interactions between receptor signaling networks drive the regulatory T cell versus T helper 17 cell fate choice
title_short Synergistic and additive interactions between receptor signaling networks drive the regulatory T cell versus T helper 17 cell fate choice
title_sort synergistic and additive interactions between receptor signaling networks drive the regulatory t cell versus t helper 17 cell fate choice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8645459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34688667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101330
work_keys_str_mv AT pradodouglass synergisticandadditiveinteractionsbetweenreceptorsignalingnetworksdrivetheregulatorytcellversusthelper17cellfatechoice
AT cattleyrichardt synergisticandadditiveinteractionsbetweenreceptorsignalingnetworksdrivetheregulatorytcellversusthelper17cellfatechoice
AT shipmancoreyw synergisticandadditiveinteractionsbetweenreceptorsignalingnetworksdrivetheregulatorytcellversusthelper17cellfatechoice
AT happecassandra synergisticandadditiveinteractionsbetweenreceptorsignalingnetworksdrivetheregulatorytcellversusthelper17cellfatechoice
AT leemijoon synergisticandadditiveinteractionsbetweenreceptorsignalingnetworksdrivetheregulatorytcellversusthelper17cellfatechoice
AT boggesswilliamc synergisticandadditiveinteractionsbetweenreceptorsignalingnetworksdrivetheregulatorytcellversusthelper17cellfatechoice
AT macdonaldmatthewl synergisticandadditiveinteractionsbetweenreceptorsignalingnetworksdrivetheregulatorytcellversusthelper17cellfatechoice
AT hawsewilliamf synergisticandadditiveinteractionsbetweenreceptorsignalingnetworksdrivetheregulatorytcellversusthelper17cellfatechoice