Cargando…
Integrating a Grassroots Well-Being Curriculum into a Radiation Oncology Residency Program
PURPOSE: The burnout rate among US radiation oncology residents was 33% in 2016. To our knowledge there are no published interventions addressing burnout among radiation oncology residents. We describe the implementation of a well-being curriculum, cocreated by a psychologist, a medical humanities p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8654639/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34934867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2021.100837 |
_version_ | 1784611903123750912 |
---|---|
author | Gergelis, Kimberly R. Anand, Uma S. Rian, Johanna S. Roberts, Kristofer W. Quinones, Pamela J. Olivier, Kenneth R. Corbin, Kimberly S. Stonnington, Cynthia M |
author_facet | Gergelis, Kimberly R. Anand, Uma S. Rian, Johanna S. Roberts, Kristofer W. Quinones, Pamela J. Olivier, Kenneth R. Corbin, Kimberly S. Stonnington, Cynthia M |
author_sort | Gergelis, Kimberly R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The burnout rate among US radiation oncology residents was 33% in 2016. To our knowledge there are no published interventions addressing burnout among radiation oncology residents. We describe the implementation of a well-being curriculum, cocreated by a psychologist, a medical humanities professional, and radiation oncology attending and resident physicians. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Radiation oncology residents at our institution were surveyed to determine themes that induced burnout. A curriculum was developed, with monthly small group sessions focused on 1 identified topic. Sessions alternated between psychological tool-focused approaches and humanities exercises. These were led by a psychologist or medical humanities professional. Residents were given protected time to attend sessions during business hours. Participation was optional. Participants were assigned a random identifier, and the Stanford Professional Fulfillment Index (PFI) was assessed at baseline and 3-month intervals. PFI trends were analyzed after 1 year. At the end of the year, a focus group was held to evaluate work satisfaction and self-reported interactions with patients and coworkers. This information was used to improve the curriculum. RESULTS: All 12 residents in the radiation oncology program participated in the curriculum. There was an equal number of residents of postgraduate years 2 through 5. Six of the participants were female. Of the participants, 11 completed the PFI. At baseline, 80% of residents met criteria for burnout. This decreased to 67%, 50%, and 33% at 3, 6, and 9 months, respectively. The proportion of residents meeting criteria for very good professional fulfillment was 30%, 56%, 38%, and 22% at baseline and 3, 6, and 9 months, respectively. On average, 9 of 12 residents attended each session. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience demonstrates the feasibility of collaborating with residents in the development of a well-being curriculum to cater programming to their needs, which we believe led to excellent engagement and attendance at each session. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8654639 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86546392021-12-20 Integrating a Grassroots Well-Being Curriculum into a Radiation Oncology Residency Program Gergelis, Kimberly R. Anand, Uma S. Rian, Johanna S. Roberts, Kristofer W. Quinones, Pamela J. Olivier, Kenneth R. Corbin, Kimberly S. Stonnington, Cynthia M Adv Radiat Oncol Research Letter PURPOSE: The burnout rate among US radiation oncology residents was 33% in 2016. To our knowledge there are no published interventions addressing burnout among radiation oncology residents. We describe the implementation of a well-being curriculum, cocreated by a psychologist, a medical humanities professional, and radiation oncology attending and resident physicians. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Radiation oncology residents at our institution were surveyed to determine themes that induced burnout. A curriculum was developed, with monthly small group sessions focused on 1 identified topic. Sessions alternated between psychological tool-focused approaches and humanities exercises. These were led by a psychologist or medical humanities professional. Residents were given protected time to attend sessions during business hours. Participation was optional. Participants were assigned a random identifier, and the Stanford Professional Fulfillment Index (PFI) was assessed at baseline and 3-month intervals. PFI trends were analyzed after 1 year. At the end of the year, a focus group was held to evaluate work satisfaction and self-reported interactions with patients and coworkers. This information was used to improve the curriculum. RESULTS: All 12 residents in the radiation oncology program participated in the curriculum. There was an equal number of residents of postgraduate years 2 through 5. Six of the participants were female. Of the participants, 11 completed the PFI. At baseline, 80% of residents met criteria for burnout. This decreased to 67%, 50%, and 33% at 3, 6, and 9 months, respectively. The proportion of residents meeting criteria for very good professional fulfillment was 30%, 56%, 38%, and 22% at baseline and 3, 6, and 9 months, respectively. On average, 9 of 12 residents attended each session. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience demonstrates the feasibility of collaborating with residents in the development of a well-being curriculum to cater programming to their needs, which we believe led to excellent engagement and attendance at each session. Elsevier 2021-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8654639/ /pubmed/34934867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2021.100837 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Letter Gergelis, Kimberly R. Anand, Uma S. Rian, Johanna S. Roberts, Kristofer W. Quinones, Pamela J. Olivier, Kenneth R. Corbin, Kimberly S. Stonnington, Cynthia M Integrating a Grassroots Well-Being Curriculum into a Radiation Oncology Residency Program |
title | Integrating a Grassroots Well-Being Curriculum into a Radiation Oncology Residency Program |
title_full | Integrating a Grassroots Well-Being Curriculum into a Radiation Oncology Residency Program |
title_fullStr | Integrating a Grassroots Well-Being Curriculum into a Radiation Oncology Residency Program |
title_full_unstemmed | Integrating a Grassroots Well-Being Curriculum into a Radiation Oncology Residency Program |
title_short | Integrating a Grassroots Well-Being Curriculum into a Radiation Oncology Residency Program |
title_sort | integrating a grassroots well-being curriculum into a radiation oncology residency program |
topic | Research Letter |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8654639/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34934867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2021.100837 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gergeliskimberlyr integratingagrassrootswellbeingcurriculumintoaradiationoncologyresidencyprogram AT anandumas integratingagrassrootswellbeingcurriculumintoaradiationoncologyresidencyprogram AT rianjohannas integratingagrassrootswellbeingcurriculumintoaradiationoncologyresidencyprogram AT robertskristoferw integratingagrassrootswellbeingcurriculumintoaradiationoncologyresidencyprogram AT quinonespamelaj integratingagrassrootswellbeingcurriculumintoaradiationoncologyresidencyprogram AT olivierkennethr integratingagrassrootswellbeingcurriculumintoaradiationoncologyresidencyprogram AT corbinkimberlys integratingagrassrootswellbeingcurriculumintoaradiationoncologyresidencyprogram AT stonningtoncynthiam integratingagrassrootswellbeingcurriculumintoaradiationoncologyresidencyprogram |