Cargando…
Worse Theory of Mind in Only-Children Compared to Children With Siblings and Its Intervention
The purpose of this study was to explore theory of mind (ToM) differences in children with different birth orders (only-children, first-born children, and second-born children), and further explore the effect of cognitive verb training for only-children’s ToM. Adopting the paradigm of false belief,...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8655311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34899495 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.754168 |
_version_ | 1784612045592723456 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Zhuo Yu, Haoxue Long, Muyun Li, Hui |
author_facet | Zhang, Zhuo Yu, Haoxue Long, Muyun Li, Hui |
author_sort | Zhang, Zhuo |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to explore theory of mind (ToM) differences in children with different birth orders (only-children, first-born children, and second-born children), and further explore the effect of cognitive verb training for only-children’s ToM. Adopting the paradigm of false belief, Study 1 was conducted in which a sample of 120 children aged 3–6, including first-born children, second-born children (siblings aged 1–13 years), and only-children were tested. The results showed that (1) children aged 3–6 had significantly higher scores on first-order false-belief than second-order false-belief. (2) Controlling for age, the only-children scored significantly lower than the first-born children. In Study 2, 28 only-children aged 4–5 (13 in the experimental group and 15 in the control group) who initially failed in false-belief tasks were trained with the cognitive verb animations. Significant post-training improvements were observed for only-children who received training of animations embedded with cognitive verb. Those findings indicated that ToM of only-children was significantly worse than first-born children of two-child families, and linguistic training could facilitate ToM of only-children whose ToM were at a disadvantage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8655311 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86553112021-12-10 Worse Theory of Mind in Only-Children Compared to Children With Siblings and Its Intervention Zhang, Zhuo Yu, Haoxue Long, Muyun Li, Hui Front Psychol Psychology The purpose of this study was to explore theory of mind (ToM) differences in children with different birth orders (only-children, first-born children, and second-born children), and further explore the effect of cognitive verb training for only-children’s ToM. Adopting the paradigm of false belief, Study 1 was conducted in which a sample of 120 children aged 3–6, including first-born children, second-born children (siblings aged 1–13 years), and only-children were tested. The results showed that (1) children aged 3–6 had significantly higher scores on first-order false-belief than second-order false-belief. (2) Controlling for age, the only-children scored significantly lower than the first-born children. In Study 2, 28 only-children aged 4–5 (13 in the experimental group and 15 in the control group) who initially failed in false-belief tasks were trained with the cognitive verb animations. Significant post-training improvements were observed for only-children who received training of animations embedded with cognitive verb. Those findings indicated that ToM of only-children was significantly worse than first-born children of two-child families, and linguistic training could facilitate ToM of only-children whose ToM were at a disadvantage. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8655311/ /pubmed/34899495 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.754168 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhang, Yu, Long and Li. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Zhang, Zhuo Yu, Haoxue Long, Muyun Li, Hui Worse Theory of Mind in Only-Children Compared to Children With Siblings and Its Intervention |
title | Worse Theory of Mind in Only-Children Compared to Children With Siblings and Its Intervention |
title_full | Worse Theory of Mind in Only-Children Compared to Children With Siblings and Its Intervention |
title_fullStr | Worse Theory of Mind in Only-Children Compared to Children With Siblings and Its Intervention |
title_full_unstemmed | Worse Theory of Mind in Only-Children Compared to Children With Siblings and Its Intervention |
title_short | Worse Theory of Mind in Only-Children Compared to Children With Siblings and Its Intervention |
title_sort | worse theory of mind in only-children compared to children with siblings and its intervention |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8655311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34899495 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.754168 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangzhuo worsetheoryofmindinonlychildrencomparedtochildrenwithsiblingsanditsintervention AT yuhaoxue worsetheoryofmindinonlychildrencomparedtochildrenwithsiblingsanditsintervention AT longmuyun worsetheoryofmindinonlychildrencomparedtochildrenwithsiblingsanditsintervention AT lihui worsetheoryofmindinonlychildrencomparedtochildrenwithsiblingsanditsintervention |