Cargando…

The Effect of Sound Frequency and Intensity on Yeast Growth, Fermentation Performance and Volatile Composition of Beer

This study investigated the impact of varying sound conditions (frequency and intensity) on yeast growth, fermentation performance and production of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in beer. Fermentations were carried out in plastic bags suspended in large water-filled containers fitted with underw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adadi, Parise, Harris, Alastair, Bremer, Phil, Silcock, Patrick, Ganley, Austen R. D., Jeffs, Andrew G., Eyres, Graham T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8658799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34885824
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26237239
_version_ 1784612812910231552
author Adadi, Parise
Harris, Alastair
Bremer, Phil
Silcock, Patrick
Ganley, Austen R. D.
Jeffs, Andrew G.
Eyres, Graham T.
author_facet Adadi, Parise
Harris, Alastair
Bremer, Phil
Silcock, Patrick
Ganley, Austen R. D.
Jeffs, Andrew G.
Eyres, Graham T.
author_sort Adadi, Parise
collection PubMed
description This study investigated the impact of varying sound conditions (frequency and intensity) on yeast growth, fermentation performance and production of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in beer. Fermentations were carried out in plastic bags suspended in large water-filled containers fitted with underwater speakers. Ferments were subjected to either 200–800 or 800–2000 Hz at 124 and 140 dB @ 20 µPa. Headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was used to identify and measure the relative abundance of the VOCs produced. Sound treatment had significant effects on the number of viable yeast cells in suspension at 10 and 24 h (p < 0.05), with control (silence) samples having the highest cell numbers. For wort gravity, there were significant differences between treatments at 24 and 48 h, with the silence control showing the lowest density before all ferments converged to the same final gravity at 140 h. A total of 33 VOCs were identified in the beer samples, including twelve esters, nine alcohols, three acids, three aldehydes, and six hop-derived compounds. Only the abundance of some alcohols showed any consistent response to the sound treatments. These results show that the application of audible sound via underwater transmission to a beer fermentation elicited limited changes to wort gravity and VOCs during fermentation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8658799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86587992021-12-10 The Effect of Sound Frequency and Intensity on Yeast Growth, Fermentation Performance and Volatile Composition of Beer Adadi, Parise Harris, Alastair Bremer, Phil Silcock, Patrick Ganley, Austen R. D. Jeffs, Andrew G. Eyres, Graham T. Molecules Article This study investigated the impact of varying sound conditions (frequency and intensity) on yeast growth, fermentation performance and production of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in beer. Fermentations were carried out in plastic bags suspended in large water-filled containers fitted with underwater speakers. Ferments were subjected to either 200–800 or 800–2000 Hz at 124 and 140 dB @ 20 µPa. Headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was used to identify and measure the relative abundance of the VOCs produced. Sound treatment had significant effects on the number of viable yeast cells in suspension at 10 and 24 h (p < 0.05), with control (silence) samples having the highest cell numbers. For wort gravity, there were significant differences between treatments at 24 and 48 h, with the silence control showing the lowest density before all ferments converged to the same final gravity at 140 h. A total of 33 VOCs were identified in the beer samples, including twelve esters, nine alcohols, three acids, three aldehydes, and six hop-derived compounds. Only the abundance of some alcohols showed any consistent response to the sound treatments. These results show that the application of audible sound via underwater transmission to a beer fermentation elicited limited changes to wort gravity and VOCs during fermentation. MDPI 2021-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8658799/ /pubmed/34885824 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26237239 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Adadi, Parise
Harris, Alastair
Bremer, Phil
Silcock, Patrick
Ganley, Austen R. D.
Jeffs, Andrew G.
Eyres, Graham T.
The Effect of Sound Frequency and Intensity on Yeast Growth, Fermentation Performance and Volatile Composition of Beer
title The Effect of Sound Frequency and Intensity on Yeast Growth, Fermentation Performance and Volatile Composition of Beer
title_full The Effect of Sound Frequency and Intensity on Yeast Growth, Fermentation Performance and Volatile Composition of Beer
title_fullStr The Effect of Sound Frequency and Intensity on Yeast Growth, Fermentation Performance and Volatile Composition of Beer
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Sound Frequency and Intensity on Yeast Growth, Fermentation Performance and Volatile Composition of Beer
title_short The Effect of Sound Frequency and Intensity on Yeast Growth, Fermentation Performance and Volatile Composition of Beer
title_sort effect of sound frequency and intensity on yeast growth, fermentation performance and volatile composition of beer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8658799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34885824
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26237239
work_keys_str_mv AT adadiparise theeffectofsoundfrequencyandintensityonyeastgrowthfermentationperformanceandvolatilecompositionofbeer
AT harrisalastair theeffectofsoundfrequencyandintensityonyeastgrowthfermentationperformanceandvolatilecompositionofbeer
AT bremerphil theeffectofsoundfrequencyandintensityonyeastgrowthfermentationperformanceandvolatilecompositionofbeer
AT silcockpatrick theeffectofsoundfrequencyandintensityonyeastgrowthfermentationperformanceandvolatilecompositionofbeer
AT ganleyaustenrd theeffectofsoundfrequencyandintensityonyeastgrowthfermentationperformanceandvolatilecompositionofbeer
AT jeffsandrewg theeffectofsoundfrequencyandintensityonyeastgrowthfermentationperformanceandvolatilecompositionofbeer
AT eyresgrahamt theeffectofsoundfrequencyandintensityonyeastgrowthfermentationperformanceandvolatilecompositionofbeer
AT adadiparise effectofsoundfrequencyandintensityonyeastgrowthfermentationperformanceandvolatilecompositionofbeer
AT harrisalastair effectofsoundfrequencyandintensityonyeastgrowthfermentationperformanceandvolatilecompositionofbeer
AT bremerphil effectofsoundfrequencyandintensityonyeastgrowthfermentationperformanceandvolatilecompositionofbeer
AT silcockpatrick effectofsoundfrequencyandintensityonyeastgrowthfermentationperformanceandvolatilecompositionofbeer
AT ganleyaustenrd effectofsoundfrequencyandintensityonyeastgrowthfermentationperformanceandvolatilecompositionofbeer
AT jeffsandrewg effectofsoundfrequencyandintensityonyeastgrowthfermentationperformanceandvolatilecompositionofbeer
AT eyresgrahamt effectofsoundfrequencyandintensityonyeastgrowthfermentationperformanceandvolatilecompositionofbeer