Cargando…

Evaluating hearing results in stapedotomy: Comparison of fluoroplastic Causse loop piston and Matrix prosthesis

OBJECTIVE: We carried out this research to assess and compare post‐stapedotomy hearing results of Matrix titanium prosthesis with a Teflon piston prosthesis, specifically the fluoroplastic (Teflon) Causse loop piston prosthesis in patients who suffered from otosclerosis. METHODOLOGY: In this retrosp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faramarzi, Mohammad, Pedramfard, Pegah, Roosta, Sareh, Kazemi, Tayebeh, Aboughadare, Hanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8665457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34938864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.675
_version_ 1784614012745416704
author Faramarzi, Mohammad
Pedramfard, Pegah
Roosta, Sareh
Kazemi, Tayebeh
Aboughadare, Hanie
author_facet Faramarzi, Mohammad
Pedramfard, Pegah
Roosta, Sareh
Kazemi, Tayebeh
Aboughadare, Hanie
author_sort Faramarzi, Mohammad
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We carried out this research to assess and compare post‐stapedotomy hearing results of Matrix titanium prosthesis with a Teflon piston prosthesis, specifically the fluoroplastic (Teflon) Causse loop piston prosthesis in patients who suffered from otosclerosis. METHODOLOGY: In this retrospective study, Causse loop piston prosthesis was used in 81 ears, and the Matrix prosthesis was applied in 44 ears. For pairwise matching with Matrix prosthesis, 44 out of 81 Causse loop piston‐treated ears were selected based on preoperative audiometric data. Then, postoperative audiometric results of these two groups were compared. The main outcomes were pure tone audiometric results and air‐bone gap (ABG) closure before and after the surgery. Incidence of postoperative sensorineural hearing loss was also evaluated and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The results revealed no significant difference in improvement of speech reception threshold, mean air conduction, bone conduction gain, ABG closure, and incidence of postoperative sensorineural hearing loss at the frequencies of 0.5‐4 kHz between the two groups. However, performance of Matrix prosthesis was better in ABG closure at a frequency of 250 Hz. CONCLUSION: Herein, similar postoperative improvement was achieved at the frequencies of 0.5‐4 kHz; nevertheless, Matrix provided better ABG closure at frequency of 250 Hz in short term. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8665457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86654572021-12-21 Evaluating hearing results in stapedotomy: Comparison of fluoroplastic Causse loop piston and Matrix prosthesis Faramarzi, Mohammad Pedramfard, Pegah Roosta, Sareh Kazemi, Tayebeh Aboughadare, Hanie Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Comprehensive (General) Otolaryngology OBJECTIVE: We carried out this research to assess and compare post‐stapedotomy hearing results of Matrix titanium prosthesis with a Teflon piston prosthesis, specifically the fluoroplastic (Teflon) Causse loop piston prosthesis in patients who suffered from otosclerosis. METHODOLOGY: In this retrospective study, Causse loop piston prosthesis was used in 81 ears, and the Matrix prosthesis was applied in 44 ears. For pairwise matching with Matrix prosthesis, 44 out of 81 Causse loop piston‐treated ears were selected based on preoperative audiometric data. Then, postoperative audiometric results of these two groups were compared. The main outcomes were pure tone audiometric results and air‐bone gap (ABG) closure before and after the surgery. Incidence of postoperative sensorineural hearing loss was also evaluated and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The results revealed no significant difference in improvement of speech reception threshold, mean air conduction, bone conduction gain, ABG closure, and incidence of postoperative sensorineural hearing loss at the frequencies of 0.5‐4 kHz between the two groups. However, performance of Matrix prosthesis was better in ABG closure at a frequency of 250 Hz. CONCLUSION: Herein, similar postoperative improvement was achieved at the frequencies of 0.5‐4 kHz; nevertheless, Matrix provided better ABG closure at frequency of 250 Hz in short term. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8665457/ /pubmed/34938864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.675 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of The Triological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Comprehensive (General) Otolaryngology
Faramarzi, Mohammad
Pedramfard, Pegah
Roosta, Sareh
Kazemi, Tayebeh
Aboughadare, Hanie
Evaluating hearing results in stapedotomy: Comparison of fluoroplastic Causse loop piston and Matrix prosthesis
title Evaluating hearing results in stapedotomy: Comparison of fluoroplastic Causse loop piston and Matrix prosthesis
title_full Evaluating hearing results in stapedotomy: Comparison of fluoroplastic Causse loop piston and Matrix prosthesis
title_fullStr Evaluating hearing results in stapedotomy: Comparison of fluoroplastic Causse loop piston and Matrix prosthesis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating hearing results in stapedotomy: Comparison of fluoroplastic Causse loop piston and Matrix prosthesis
title_short Evaluating hearing results in stapedotomy: Comparison of fluoroplastic Causse loop piston and Matrix prosthesis
title_sort evaluating hearing results in stapedotomy: comparison of fluoroplastic causse loop piston and matrix prosthesis
topic Comprehensive (General) Otolaryngology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8665457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34938864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.675
work_keys_str_mv AT faramarzimohammad evaluatinghearingresultsinstapedotomycomparisonoffluoroplasticcausselooppistonandmatrixprosthesis
AT pedramfardpegah evaluatinghearingresultsinstapedotomycomparisonoffluoroplasticcausselooppistonandmatrixprosthesis
AT roostasareh evaluatinghearingresultsinstapedotomycomparisonoffluoroplasticcausselooppistonandmatrixprosthesis
AT kazemitayebeh evaluatinghearingresultsinstapedotomycomparisonoffluoroplasticcausselooppistonandmatrixprosthesis
AT aboughadarehanie evaluatinghearingresultsinstapedotomycomparisonoffluoroplasticcausselooppistonandmatrixprosthesis