Cargando…
A resource for understanding and evaluating outcomes of undergraduate field experiences
Undergraduate field experiences (UFEs) are a prominent element of science education across many disciplines; however, empirical data regarding the outcomes are often limited. UFEs are unique in that they typically take place in a field setting, are often interdisciplinary, and include diverse studen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8668733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34938443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8241 |
_version_ | 1784614637905379328 |
---|---|
author | Shortlidge, Erin E. Jolley, Alison Shaulskiy, Stephanie Geraghty Ward, Emily Lorentz, Christopher N. O'Connell, Kari |
author_facet | Shortlidge, Erin E. Jolley, Alison Shaulskiy, Stephanie Geraghty Ward, Emily Lorentz, Christopher N. O'Connell, Kari |
author_sort | Shortlidge, Erin E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Undergraduate field experiences (UFEs) are a prominent element of science education across many disciplines; however, empirical data regarding the outcomes are often limited. UFEs are unique in that they typically take place in a field setting, are often interdisciplinary, and include diverse students. UFEs range from courses, to field trips, to residential research experiences, and thereby have the potential to yield a plethora of outcomes for undergraduate participants. The UFE community has expressed interest in better understanding how to assess the outcomes of UFEs. In response, we developed a guide for practitioners to use when assessing their UFE that promotes an evidence‐based, systematic, iterative approach. This essay guides practitioners through the steps of: identifying intended UFE outcomes, considering contextual factors, determining an assessment approach, and using the information gained to inform next steps. We provide a table of common learning outcomes with aligned assessment tools, and vignettes to illustrate using the assessment guide. We aim to support comprehensive, informed assessment of UFEs, thus leading to more inclusive and reflective UFE design, and ultimately improved student outcomes. We urge practitioners to move toward evidence‐based advocacy for continued support of UFEs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8668733 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86687332021-12-21 A resource for understanding and evaluating outcomes of undergraduate field experiences Shortlidge, Erin E. Jolley, Alison Shaulskiy, Stephanie Geraghty Ward, Emily Lorentz, Christopher N. O'Connell, Kari Ecol Evol Academic Practice in Ecology and Evolution Undergraduate field experiences (UFEs) are a prominent element of science education across many disciplines; however, empirical data regarding the outcomes are often limited. UFEs are unique in that they typically take place in a field setting, are often interdisciplinary, and include diverse students. UFEs range from courses, to field trips, to residential research experiences, and thereby have the potential to yield a plethora of outcomes for undergraduate participants. The UFE community has expressed interest in better understanding how to assess the outcomes of UFEs. In response, we developed a guide for practitioners to use when assessing their UFE that promotes an evidence‐based, systematic, iterative approach. This essay guides practitioners through the steps of: identifying intended UFE outcomes, considering contextual factors, determining an assessment approach, and using the information gained to inform next steps. We provide a table of common learning outcomes with aligned assessment tools, and vignettes to illustrate using the assessment guide. We aim to support comprehensive, informed assessment of UFEs, thus leading to more inclusive and reflective UFE design, and ultimately improved student outcomes. We urge practitioners to move toward evidence‐based advocacy for continued support of UFEs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8668733/ /pubmed/34938443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8241 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Academic Practice in Ecology and Evolution Shortlidge, Erin E. Jolley, Alison Shaulskiy, Stephanie Geraghty Ward, Emily Lorentz, Christopher N. O'Connell, Kari A resource for understanding and evaluating outcomes of undergraduate field experiences |
title | A resource for understanding and evaluating outcomes of undergraduate field experiences |
title_full | A resource for understanding and evaluating outcomes of undergraduate field experiences |
title_fullStr | A resource for understanding and evaluating outcomes of undergraduate field experiences |
title_full_unstemmed | A resource for understanding and evaluating outcomes of undergraduate field experiences |
title_short | A resource for understanding and evaluating outcomes of undergraduate field experiences |
title_sort | resource for understanding and evaluating outcomes of undergraduate field experiences |
topic | Academic Practice in Ecology and Evolution |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8668733/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34938443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8241 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shortlidgeerine aresourceforunderstandingandevaluatingoutcomesofundergraduatefieldexperiences AT jolleyalison aresourceforunderstandingandevaluatingoutcomesofundergraduatefieldexperiences AT shaulskiystephanie aresourceforunderstandingandevaluatingoutcomesofundergraduatefieldexperiences AT geraghtywardemily aresourceforunderstandingandevaluatingoutcomesofundergraduatefieldexperiences AT lorentzchristophern aresourceforunderstandingandevaluatingoutcomesofundergraduatefieldexperiences AT oconnellkari aresourceforunderstandingandevaluatingoutcomesofundergraduatefieldexperiences AT shortlidgeerine resourceforunderstandingandevaluatingoutcomesofundergraduatefieldexperiences AT jolleyalison resourceforunderstandingandevaluatingoutcomesofundergraduatefieldexperiences AT shaulskiystephanie resourceforunderstandingandevaluatingoutcomesofundergraduatefieldexperiences AT geraghtywardemily resourceforunderstandingandevaluatingoutcomesofundergraduatefieldexperiences AT lorentzchristophern resourceforunderstandingandevaluatingoutcomesofundergraduatefieldexperiences AT oconnellkari resourceforunderstandingandevaluatingoutcomesofundergraduatefieldexperiences |