Cargando…

A Cross-Sectional Study: Are Myths on Cleft Lip and Palate Still Prevalent?

Background The etiology of cleft lip and palate (CL/P) remains largely unidentified. Evidence-based research shows a strong association with genetics, environmental factors, nutritional deficiency, smoking, alcohol, and drug misuse. Despite the increase in knowledge and widespread access to medical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Turlapati, Sravya, Krishna, Sai, Deepak, Korutla U, Kanagaraja, Baggialaxmi, Gayathri, Kanaparthi A, Jahagirdar, Divya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8671751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34926050
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.19579
_version_ 1784615206012321792
author Turlapati, Sravya
Krishna, Sai
Deepak, Korutla U
Kanagaraja, Baggialaxmi
Gayathri, Kanaparthi A
Jahagirdar, Divya
author_facet Turlapati, Sravya
Krishna, Sai
Deepak, Korutla U
Kanagaraja, Baggialaxmi
Gayathri, Kanaparthi A
Jahagirdar, Divya
author_sort Turlapati, Sravya
collection PubMed
description Background The etiology of cleft lip and palate (CL/P) remains largely unidentified. Evidence-based research shows a strong association with genetics, environmental factors, nutritional deficiency, smoking, alcohol, and drug misuse. Despite the increase in knowledge and widespread access to medical care beliefs contrary to science, folklores on CLP still occur in most developing countries. Methodology The study design was cross-sectional in nature and involved a sample of 136 parents of children with cleft lip and palate reporting to Smile Train Cleft Centers. It was conducted by using a self-structured questionnaire from December to March 2019. Results The highest recorded response was holding sharp objects, such as knives, scissors, or needles, during pregnancy (40.4%) and the least recorded response was for pregnant women going out on an auspicious day (3.7%). Conclusion The current study demonstrated that a majority of the parent’s socioeconomic status was upper lower class. Some parents still believe in the myths around the etiology of CLP despite the advances in medicine and technology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8671751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86717512021-12-16 A Cross-Sectional Study: Are Myths on Cleft Lip and Palate Still Prevalent? Turlapati, Sravya Krishna, Sai Deepak, Korutla U Kanagaraja, Baggialaxmi Gayathri, Kanaparthi A Jahagirdar, Divya Cureus Public Health Background The etiology of cleft lip and palate (CL/P) remains largely unidentified. Evidence-based research shows a strong association with genetics, environmental factors, nutritional deficiency, smoking, alcohol, and drug misuse. Despite the increase in knowledge and widespread access to medical care beliefs contrary to science, folklores on CLP still occur in most developing countries. Methodology The study design was cross-sectional in nature and involved a sample of 136 parents of children with cleft lip and palate reporting to Smile Train Cleft Centers. It was conducted by using a self-structured questionnaire from December to March 2019. Results The highest recorded response was holding sharp objects, such as knives, scissors, or needles, during pregnancy (40.4%) and the least recorded response was for pregnant women going out on an auspicious day (3.7%). Conclusion The current study demonstrated that a majority of the parent’s socioeconomic status was upper lower class. Some parents still believe in the myths around the etiology of CLP despite the advances in medicine and technology. Cureus 2021-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8671751/ /pubmed/34926050 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.19579 Text en Copyright © 2021, Turlapati et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Public Health
Turlapati, Sravya
Krishna, Sai
Deepak, Korutla U
Kanagaraja, Baggialaxmi
Gayathri, Kanaparthi A
Jahagirdar, Divya
A Cross-Sectional Study: Are Myths on Cleft Lip and Palate Still Prevalent?
title A Cross-Sectional Study: Are Myths on Cleft Lip and Palate Still Prevalent?
title_full A Cross-Sectional Study: Are Myths on Cleft Lip and Palate Still Prevalent?
title_fullStr A Cross-Sectional Study: Are Myths on Cleft Lip and Palate Still Prevalent?
title_full_unstemmed A Cross-Sectional Study: Are Myths on Cleft Lip and Palate Still Prevalent?
title_short A Cross-Sectional Study: Are Myths on Cleft Lip and Palate Still Prevalent?
title_sort cross-sectional study: are myths on cleft lip and palate still prevalent?
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8671751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34926050
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.19579
work_keys_str_mv AT turlapatisravya acrosssectionalstudyaremythsoncleftlipandpalatestillprevalent
AT krishnasai acrosssectionalstudyaremythsoncleftlipandpalatestillprevalent
AT deepakkorutlau acrosssectionalstudyaremythsoncleftlipandpalatestillprevalent
AT kanagarajabaggialaxmi acrosssectionalstudyaremythsoncleftlipandpalatestillprevalent
AT gayathrikanaparthia acrosssectionalstudyaremythsoncleftlipandpalatestillprevalent
AT jahagirdardivya acrosssectionalstudyaremythsoncleftlipandpalatestillprevalent
AT turlapatisravya crosssectionalstudyaremythsoncleftlipandpalatestillprevalent
AT krishnasai crosssectionalstudyaremythsoncleftlipandpalatestillprevalent
AT deepakkorutlau crosssectionalstudyaremythsoncleftlipandpalatestillprevalent
AT kanagarajabaggialaxmi crosssectionalstudyaremythsoncleftlipandpalatestillprevalent
AT gayathrikanaparthia crosssectionalstudyaremythsoncleftlipandpalatestillprevalent
AT jahagirdardivya crosssectionalstudyaremythsoncleftlipandpalatestillprevalent