Cargando…

Interdisciplinary groups perform better than intradisciplinary groups in online group discussion activities

Online classes have been provided for health-care pre-licensure learners during the novel coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of online group work in interprofessional education. A total of 209 students were assigned to 50 groups (18 medical stude...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yamashita, Taro, Osawa, Shuji, Ota, Kunio, Minami, Takahiro, Morisaki, Yuma, Takahashi, Yutaro, Itatani, Tomoya, Hara, Satoshi, Tamai, Toshikatsu, Fujiu, Makoto, Nomura, Hideki, Okamoto, Rie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8676687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33557724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1886649
_version_ 1784615991885430784
author Yamashita, Taro
Osawa, Shuji
Ota, Kunio
Minami, Takahiro
Morisaki, Yuma
Takahashi, Yutaro
Itatani, Tomoya
Hara, Satoshi
Tamai, Toshikatsu
Fujiu, Makoto
Nomura, Hideki
Okamoto, Rie
author_facet Yamashita, Taro
Osawa, Shuji
Ota, Kunio
Minami, Takahiro
Morisaki, Yuma
Takahashi, Yutaro
Itatani, Tomoya
Hara, Satoshi
Tamai, Toshikatsu
Fujiu, Makoto
Nomura, Hideki
Okamoto, Rie
author_sort Yamashita, Taro
collection PubMed
description Online classes have been provided for health-care pre-licensure learners during the novel coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of online group work in interprofessional education. A total of 209 students were assigned to 50 groups (18 medical student groups, 13 nursing student groups, and 19 mixed medical/nursing student groups). Learners performed group work during the orientation for the course, which was hosted using an online video conferencing system. The learners first performed the activity individually (10 min) and then engaged in a group discussion to reach consensus on their answers (30 min). We calculated the scores before and after the group discussion and shared the results with the students. Scores were improved after the group discussion (mean ± SEM, 23.7 ± 0.9) compared with before (37.3 ± 1.3) (P < .0001). Lower scores after the group discussion, which indicated the effect of the group discussion on making better decisions, were observed most in the mixed medical/nursing student groups, followed by the nursing student and medical student groups. We noted only 3 groups in which the group discussion showed a negative effect on decision-making: all 3 of these groups were mixed (3 of 19 groups; 16%). These data demonstrated the power of group discussion for solving tasks when the participants’ professional fields were mixed. However, the small size of the interdisciplinary groups might have resulted in less effective discussion, which might be due in part to psychological barriers arising from professional differences. Online group work is effective for facilitating discussion and building consensus about decisions in interprofessional education for medical and nursing students. Potential psychological barriers may exist in about 16% of mixed group students at the start, which should be kept in mind by instructors. Abbreviations: COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019; IPE: Interprofessional Education; NASA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration; SD: standard deviation; WHO: World Health Organization
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8676687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86766872021-12-17 Interdisciplinary groups perform better than intradisciplinary groups in online group discussion activities Yamashita, Taro Osawa, Shuji Ota, Kunio Minami, Takahiro Morisaki, Yuma Takahashi, Yutaro Itatani, Tomoya Hara, Satoshi Tamai, Toshikatsu Fujiu, Makoto Nomura, Hideki Okamoto, Rie Med Educ Online Research Article Online classes have been provided for health-care pre-licensure learners during the novel coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of online group work in interprofessional education. A total of 209 students were assigned to 50 groups (18 medical student groups, 13 nursing student groups, and 19 mixed medical/nursing student groups). Learners performed group work during the orientation for the course, which was hosted using an online video conferencing system. The learners first performed the activity individually (10 min) and then engaged in a group discussion to reach consensus on their answers (30 min). We calculated the scores before and after the group discussion and shared the results with the students. Scores were improved after the group discussion (mean ± SEM, 23.7 ± 0.9) compared with before (37.3 ± 1.3) (P < .0001). Lower scores after the group discussion, which indicated the effect of the group discussion on making better decisions, were observed most in the mixed medical/nursing student groups, followed by the nursing student and medical student groups. We noted only 3 groups in which the group discussion showed a negative effect on decision-making: all 3 of these groups were mixed (3 of 19 groups; 16%). These data demonstrated the power of group discussion for solving tasks when the participants’ professional fields were mixed. However, the small size of the interdisciplinary groups might have resulted in less effective discussion, which might be due in part to psychological barriers arising from professional differences. Online group work is effective for facilitating discussion and building consensus about decisions in interprofessional education for medical and nursing students. Potential psychological barriers may exist in about 16% of mixed group students at the start, which should be kept in mind by instructors. Abbreviations: COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019; IPE: Interprofessional Education; NASA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration; SD: standard deviation; WHO: World Health Organization Taylor & Francis 2021-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8676687/ /pubmed/33557724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1886649 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yamashita, Taro
Osawa, Shuji
Ota, Kunio
Minami, Takahiro
Morisaki, Yuma
Takahashi, Yutaro
Itatani, Tomoya
Hara, Satoshi
Tamai, Toshikatsu
Fujiu, Makoto
Nomura, Hideki
Okamoto, Rie
Interdisciplinary groups perform better than intradisciplinary groups in online group discussion activities
title Interdisciplinary groups perform better than intradisciplinary groups in online group discussion activities
title_full Interdisciplinary groups perform better than intradisciplinary groups in online group discussion activities
title_fullStr Interdisciplinary groups perform better than intradisciplinary groups in online group discussion activities
title_full_unstemmed Interdisciplinary groups perform better than intradisciplinary groups in online group discussion activities
title_short Interdisciplinary groups perform better than intradisciplinary groups in online group discussion activities
title_sort interdisciplinary groups perform better than intradisciplinary groups in online group discussion activities
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8676687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33557724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1886649
work_keys_str_mv AT yamashitataro interdisciplinarygroupsperformbetterthanintradisciplinarygroupsinonlinegroupdiscussionactivities
AT osawashuji interdisciplinarygroupsperformbetterthanintradisciplinarygroupsinonlinegroupdiscussionactivities
AT otakunio interdisciplinarygroupsperformbetterthanintradisciplinarygroupsinonlinegroupdiscussionactivities
AT minamitakahiro interdisciplinarygroupsperformbetterthanintradisciplinarygroupsinonlinegroupdiscussionactivities
AT morisakiyuma interdisciplinarygroupsperformbetterthanintradisciplinarygroupsinonlinegroupdiscussionactivities
AT takahashiyutaro interdisciplinarygroupsperformbetterthanintradisciplinarygroupsinonlinegroupdiscussionactivities
AT itatanitomoya interdisciplinarygroupsperformbetterthanintradisciplinarygroupsinonlinegroupdiscussionactivities
AT harasatoshi interdisciplinarygroupsperformbetterthanintradisciplinarygroupsinonlinegroupdiscussionactivities
AT tamaitoshikatsu interdisciplinarygroupsperformbetterthanintradisciplinarygroupsinonlinegroupdiscussionactivities
AT fujiumakoto interdisciplinarygroupsperformbetterthanintradisciplinarygroupsinonlinegroupdiscussionactivities
AT nomurahideki interdisciplinarygroupsperformbetterthanintradisciplinarygroupsinonlinegroupdiscussionactivities
AT okamotorie interdisciplinarygroupsperformbetterthanintradisciplinarygroupsinonlinegroupdiscussionactivities