Cargando…

Somatic intronic TP53 c.375+5G mutations are a recurrent but under‐recognized mode of TP53 inactivation

TP53 is one of the most ubiquitously altered genes in human cancer. The biological impact of rare variants, particularly those located within noncoding regions, remains poorly understood. From interrogation of clinical massively parallel sequencing data from over 55,000 tumors, which included 23,330...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chui, M Herman, Yang, Ciyu, Mehta, Nikita, Rai, Vikas, Zehir, Ahmet, Momeni Boroujeni, Amir, Ladanyi, Marc, Mandelker, Diana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8682938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34505757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjp2.242
_version_ 1784617313472872448
author Chui, M Herman
Yang, Ciyu
Mehta, Nikita
Rai, Vikas
Zehir, Ahmet
Momeni Boroujeni, Amir
Ladanyi, Marc
Mandelker, Diana
author_facet Chui, M Herman
Yang, Ciyu
Mehta, Nikita
Rai, Vikas
Zehir, Ahmet
Momeni Boroujeni, Amir
Ladanyi, Marc
Mandelker, Diana
author_sort Chui, M Herman
collection PubMed
description TP53 is one of the most ubiquitously altered genes in human cancer. The biological impact of rare variants, particularly those located within noncoding regions, remains poorly understood. From interrogation of clinical massively parallel sequencing data from over 55,000 tumors, which included 23,330 tumors with known TP53 mutations, TP53 intron 4 nucleotide substitutions at position c.375+5G were identified in 45 tumors (0.2% of TP53‐mutated cancers), comprising cancers of different organ sites. Loss‐of‐heterozygosity or a second‐hit somatic TP53 mutation was observed in 34 of 40 (85%) informative cases. RT‐PCR analysis showed the c.375+5G>T variant to be associated with aberrantly spliced TP53 mRNA transcripts with concomitant loss of the normal transcript. Immunohistochemical staining for p53 was performed on a representative subset of tumors with TP53 c.375+5G variants (n = 14), all of which showed loss of protein expression (100%; n = 13 complete loss, n = 1 subclonal loss). Our data are consistent with classification of TP53 c.375+5G variants as deleterious intronic mutations that interfere with proper mRNA splicing, ultimately resulting in loss of expression of functional p53 protein. The clinical scenario of a tumor with loss of p53 immunohistochemical staining, yet lacking a detectable TP53 exonic mutation, should therefore prompt consideration of splice‐altering intronic variants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8682938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86829382021-12-30 Somatic intronic TP53 c.375+5G mutations are a recurrent but under‐recognized mode of TP53 inactivation Chui, M Herman Yang, Ciyu Mehta, Nikita Rai, Vikas Zehir, Ahmet Momeni Boroujeni, Amir Ladanyi, Marc Mandelker, Diana J Pathol Clin Res Brief Report TP53 is one of the most ubiquitously altered genes in human cancer. The biological impact of rare variants, particularly those located within noncoding regions, remains poorly understood. From interrogation of clinical massively parallel sequencing data from over 55,000 tumors, which included 23,330 tumors with known TP53 mutations, TP53 intron 4 nucleotide substitutions at position c.375+5G were identified in 45 tumors (0.2% of TP53‐mutated cancers), comprising cancers of different organ sites. Loss‐of‐heterozygosity or a second‐hit somatic TP53 mutation was observed in 34 of 40 (85%) informative cases. RT‐PCR analysis showed the c.375+5G>T variant to be associated with aberrantly spliced TP53 mRNA transcripts with concomitant loss of the normal transcript. Immunohistochemical staining for p53 was performed on a representative subset of tumors with TP53 c.375+5G variants (n = 14), all of which showed loss of protein expression (100%; n = 13 complete loss, n = 1 subclonal loss). Our data are consistent with classification of TP53 c.375+5G variants as deleterious intronic mutations that interfere with proper mRNA splicing, ultimately resulting in loss of expression of functional p53 protein. The clinical scenario of a tumor with loss of p53 immunohistochemical staining, yet lacking a detectable TP53 exonic mutation, should therefore prompt consideration of splice‐altering intronic variants. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8682938/ /pubmed/34505757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjp2.242 Text en © 2021 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research published by The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Chui, M Herman
Yang, Ciyu
Mehta, Nikita
Rai, Vikas
Zehir, Ahmet
Momeni Boroujeni, Amir
Ladanyi, Marc
Mandelker, Diana
Somatic intronic TP53 c.375+5G mutations are a recurrent but under‐recognized mode of TP53 inactivation
title Somatic intronic TP53 c.375+5G mutations are a recurrent but under‐recognized mode of TP53 inactivation
title_full Somatic intronic TP53 c.375+5G mutations are a recurrent but under‐recognized mode of TP53 inactivation
title_fullStr Somatic intronic TP53 c.375+5G mutations are a recurrent but under‐recognized mode of TP53 inactivation
title_full_unstemmed Somatic intronic TP53 c.375+5G mutations are a recurrent but under‐recognized mode of TP53 inactivation
title_short Somatic intronic TP53 c.375+5G mutations are a recurrent but under‐recognized mode of TP53 inactivation
title_sort somatic intronic tp53 c.375+5g mutations are a recurrent but under‐recognized mode of tp53 inactivation
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8682938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34505757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjp2.242
work_keys_str_mv AT chuimherman somaticintronictp53c3755gmutationsarearecurrentbutunderrecognizedmodeoftp53inactivation
AT yangciyu somaticintronictp53c3755gmutationsarearecurrentbutunderrecognizedmodeoftp53inactivation
AT mehtanikita somaticintronictp53c3755gmutationsarearecurrentbutunderrecognizedmodeoftp53inactivation
AT raivikas somaticintronictp53c3755gmutationsarearecurrentbutunderrecognizedmodeoftp53inactivation
AT zehirahmet somaticintronictp53c3755gmutationsarearecurrentbutunderrecognizedmodeoftp53inactivation
AT momeniboroujeniamir somaticintronictp53c3755gmutationsarearecurrentbutunderrecognizedmodeoftp53inactivation
AT ladanyimarc somaticintronictp53c3755gmutationsarearecurrentbutunderrecognizedmodeoftp53inactivation
AT mandelkerdiana somaticintronictp53c3755gmutationsarearecurrentbutunderrecognizedmodeoftp53inactivation