Cargando…

Panitumumab Plus Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid Versus Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid Alone as Maintenance Therapy in RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Randomized PANAMA Trial (AIO KRK 0212)

PURPOSE: The randomized PANAMA trial investigated the efficacy of panitumumab (Pmab) when added to maintenance therapy with fluorouracil and folinic acid (FU/FA) in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS: Following first-line induction therapy with six cycles of FU/FA and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Modest, Dominik Paul, Karthaus, Meinolf, Fruehauf, Stefan, Graeven, Ullrich, Müller, Lothar, König, Alexander Otto, Fischer von Weikersthal, Ludwig, Caca, Karel, Kretzschmar, Albrecht, Goekkurt, Eray, Haas, Siegfried, Kurreck, Annika, Stahler, Arndt, Held, Swantje, Jarosch, Armin, Horst, David, Reinacher-Schick, Anke, Kasper, Stefan, Heinemann, Volker, Stintzing, Sebastian, Trarbach, Tanja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8683209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34533973
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.01332
_version_ 1784617363970195456
author Modest, Dominik Paul
Karthaus, Meinolf
Fruehauf, Stefan
Graeven, Ullrich
Müller, Lothar
König, Alexander Otto
Fischer von Weikersthal, Ludwig
Caca, Karel
Kretzschmar, Albrecht
Goekkurt, Eray
Haas, Siegfried
Kurreck, Annika
Stahler, Arndt
Held, Swantje
Jarosch, Armin
Horst, David
Reinacher-Schick, Anke
Kasper, Stefan
Heinemann, Volker
Stintzing, Sebastian
Trarbach, Tanja
author_facet Modest, Dominik Paul
Karthaus, Meinolf
Fruehauf, Stefan
Graeven, Ullrich
Müller, Lothar
König, Alexander Otto
Fischer von Weikersthal, Ludwig
Caca, Karel
Kretzschmar, Albrecht
Goekkurt, Eray
Haas, Siegfried
Kurreck, Annika
Stahler, Arndt
Held, Swantje
Jarosch, Armin
Horst, David
Reinacher-Schick, Anke
Kasper, Stefan
Heinemann, Volker
Stintzing, Sebastian
Trarbach, Tanja
author_sort Modest, Dominik Paul
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The randomized PANAMA trial investigated the efficacy of panitumumab (Pmab) when added to maintenance therapy with fluorouracil and folinic acid (FU/FA) in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS: Following first-line induction therapy with six cycles of FU/FA and oxaliplatin plus Pmab, responding patients (stable disease or partial or complete remission) were randomly assigned (1:1, open-label) to maintenance treatment with either FU/FA plus Pmab or FU/FA alone. The primary objective was to demonstrate superiority of progression-free survival (PFS, time from random assignment until progression or death) in favor of FU/FA plus Pmab with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.75, a power of 80%, and a significance level of 10%. Secondary end points included overall survival, objective response rate of maintenance therapy, and toxicity. Survival end points were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test and Cox regressions. Dichotomous variables were compared by Fisher's exact test; odds ratios were indicated when appropriate. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01991873). RESULTS: Overall, 248 patients were randomly assigned and received maintenance therapy with either FU/FA plus Pmab (125 patients) or FU/FA alone (123 patients). At data cutoff, with 218 events (of 218 needed), PFS of maintenance therapy was significantly improved with FU/FA plus Pmab (8.8 months v 5.7 months; HR, 0.72; 80% CI, 0.60 to 0.85; P = .014). Overall survival (event rate 54%) numerically favored the FU/FA plus Pmab arm (28.7 months v 25.7 months; HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.18; P = .32). Objective response rates were 40.8% in patients receiving FU/FA plus Pmab versus 26.0% in patients receiving FU/FA alone (odds ratio, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.14 to 3.36; P = .02). The most frequent Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event grade ≥ 3 event during maintenance therapy was skin rash (7.2%). CONCLUSION: In RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer, maintenance therapy with FU/FA plus Pmab induced a significantly superior PFS compared with FU/FA alone. If active maintenance therapy is aspired following induction therapy with FU/FA and oxaliplatin plus Pmab, FU/FA plus Pmab appears to be the most favorable option.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8683209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86832092023-01-01 Panitumumab Plus Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid Versus Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid Alone as Maintenance Therapy in RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Randomized PANAMA Trial (AIO KRK 0212) Modest, Dominik Paul Karthaus, Meinolf Fruehauf, Stefan Graeven, Ullrich Müller, Lothar König, Alexander Otto Fischer von Weikersthal, Ludwig Caca, Karel Kretzschmar, Albrecht Goekkurt, Eray Haas, Siegfried Kurreck, Annika Stahler, Arndt Held, Swantje Jarosch, Armin Horst, David Reinacher-Schick, Anke Kasper, Stefan Heinemann, Volker Stintzing, Sebastian Trarbach, Tanja J Clin Oncol ORIGINAL REPORTS PURPOSE: The randomized PANAMA trial investigated the efficacy of panitumumab (Pmab) when added to maintenance therapy with fluorouracil and folinic acid (FU/FA) in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS: Following first-line induction therapy with six cycles of FU/FA and oxaliplatin plus Pmab, responding patients (stable disease or partial or complete remission) were randomly assigned (1:1, open-label) to maintenance treatment with either FU/FA plus Pmab or FU/FA alone. The primary objective was to demonstrate superiority of progression-free survival (PFS, time from random assignment until progression or death) in favor of FU/FA plus Pmab with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.75, a power of 80%, and a significance level of 10%. Secondary end points included overall survival, objective response rate of maintenance therapy, and toxicity. Survival end points were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test and Cox regressions. Dichotomous variables were compared by Fisher's exact test; odds ratios were indicated when appropriate. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01991873). RESULTS: Overall, 248 patients were randomly assigned and received maintenance therapy with either FU/FA plus Pmab (125 patients) or FU/FA alone (123 patients). At data cutoff, with 218 events (of 218 needed), PFS of maintenance therapy was significantly improved with FU/FA plus Pmab (8.8 months v 5.7 months; HR, 0.72; 80% CI, 0.60 to 0.85; P = .014). Overall survival (event rate 54%) numerically favored the FU/FA plus Pmab arm (28.7 months v 25.7 months; HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.18; P = .32). Objective response rates were 40.8% in patients receiving FU/FA plus Pmab versus 26.0% in patients receiving FU/FA alone (odds ratio, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.14 to 3.36; P = .02). The most frequent Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event grade ≥ 3 event during maintenance therapy was skin rash (7.2%). CONCLUSION: In RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer, maintenance therapy with FU/FA plus Pmab induced a significantly superior PFS compared with FU/FA alone. If active maintenance therapy is aspired following induction therapy with FU/FA and oxaliplatin plus Pmab, FU/FA plus Pmab appears to be the most favorable option. Wolters Kluwer Health 2022-01-01 2021-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8683209/ /pubmed/34533973 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.01332 Text en © 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle ORIGINAL REPORTS
Modest, Dominik Paul
Karthaus, Meinolf
Fruehauf, Stefan
Graeven, Ullrich
Müller, Lothar
König, Alexander Otto
Fischer von Weikersthal, Ludwig
Caca, Karel
Kretzschmar, Albrecht
Goekkurt, Eray
Haas, Siegfried
Kurreck, Annika
Stahler, Arndt
Held, Swantje
Jarosch, Armin
Horst, David
Reinacher-Schick, Anke
Kasper, Stefan
Heinemann, Volker
Stintzing, Sebastian
Trarbach, Tanja
Panitumumab Plus Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid Versus Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid Alone as Maintenance Therapy in RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Randomized PANAMA Trial (AIO KRK 0212)
title Panitumumab Plus Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid Versus Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid Alone as Maintenance Therapy in RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Randomized PANAMA Trial (AIO KRK 0212)
title_full Panitumumab Plus Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid Versus Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid Alone as Maintenance Therapy in RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Randomized PANAMA Trial (AIO KRK 0212)
title_fullStr Panitumumab Plus Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid Versus Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid Alone as Maintenance Therapy in RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Randomized PANAMA Trial (AIO KRK 0212)
title_full_unstemmed Panitumumab Plus Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid Versus Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid Alone as Maintenance Therapy in RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Randomized PANAMA Trial (AIO KRK 0212)
title_short Panitumumab Plus Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid Versus Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid Alone as Maintenance Therapy in RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Randomized PANAMA Trial (AIO KRK 0212)
title_sort panitumumab plus fluorouracil and folinic acid versus fluorouracil and folinic acid alone as maintenance therapy in ras wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: the randomized panama trial (aio krk 0212)
topic ORIGINAL REPORTS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8683209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34533973
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.01332
work_keys_str_mv AT modestdominikpaul panitumumabplusfluorouracilandfolinicacidversusfluorouracilandfolinicacidaloneasmaintenancetherapyinraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancertherandomizedpanamatrialaiokrk0212
AT karthausmeinolf panitumumabplusfluorouracilandfolinicacidversusfluorouracilandfolinicacidaloneasmaintenancetherapyinraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancertherandomizedpanamatrialaiokrk0212
AT fruehaufstefan panitumumabplusfluorouracilandfolinicacidversusfluorouracilandfolinicacidaloneasmaintenancetherapyinraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancertherandomizedpanamatrialaiokrk0212
AT graevenullrich panitumumabplusfluorouracilandfolinicacidversusfluorouracilandfolinicacidaloneasmaintenancetherapyinraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancertherandomizedpanamatrialaiokrk0212
AT mullerlothar panitumumabplusfluorouracilandfolinicacidversusfluorouracilandfolinicacidaloneasmaintenancetherapyinraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancertherandomizedpanamatrialaiokrk0212
AT konigalexanderotto panitumumabplusfluorouracilandfolinicacidversusfluorouracilandfolinicacidaloneasmaintenancetherapyinraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancertherandomizedpanamatrialaiokrk0212
AT fischervonweikersthalludwig panitumumabplusfluorouracilandfolinicacidversusfluorouracilandfolinicacidaloneasmaintenancetherapyinraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancertherandomizedpanamatrialaiokrk0212
AT cacakarel panitumumabplusfluorouracilandfolinicacidversusfluorouracilandfolinicacidaloneasmaintenancetherapyinraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancertherandomizedpanamatrialaiokrk0212
AT kretzschmaralbrecht panitumumabplusfluorouracilandfolinicacidversusfluorouracilandfolinicacidaloneasmaintenancetherapyinraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancertherandomizedpanamatrialaiokrk0212
AT goekkurteray panitumumabplusfluorouracilandfolinicacidversusfluorouracilandfolinicacidaloneasmaintenancetherapyinraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancertherandomizedpanamatrialaiokrk0212
AT haassiegfried panitumumabplusfluorouracilandfolinicacidversusfluorouracilandfolinicacidaloneasmaintenancetherapyinraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancertherandomizedpanamatrialaiokrk0212
AT kurreckannika panitumumabplusfluorouracilandfolinicacidversusfluorouracilandfolinicacidaloneasmaintenancetherapyinraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancertherandomizedpanamatrialaiokrk0212
AT stahlerarndt panitumumabplusfluorouracilandfolinicacidversusfluorouracilandfolinicacidaloneasmaintenancetherapyinraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancertherandomizedpanamatrialaiokrk0212
AT heldswantje panitumumabplusfluorouracilandfolinicacidversusfluorouracilandfolinicacidaloneasmaintenancetherapyinraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancertherandomizedpanamatrialaiokrk0212
AT jaroscharmin panitumumabplusfluorouracilandfolinicacidversusfluorouracilandfolinicacidaloneasmaintenancetherapyinraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancertherandomizedpanamatrialaiokrk0212
AT horstdavid panitumumabplusfluorouracilandfolinicacidversusfluorouracilandfolinicacidaloneasmaintenancetherapyinraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancertherandomizedpanamatrialaiokrk0212
AT reinacherschickanke panitumumabplusfluorouracilandfolinicacidversusfluorouracilandfolinicacidaloneasmaintenancetherapyinraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancertherandomizedpanamatrialaiokrk0212
AT kasperstefan panitumumabplusfluorouracilandfolinicacidversusfluorouracilandfolinicacidaloneasmaintenancetherapyinraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancertherandomizedpanamatrialaiokrk0212
AT heinemannvolker panitumumabplusfluorouracilandfolinicacidversusfluorouracilandfolinicacidaloneasmaintenancetherapyinraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancertherandomizedpanamatrialaiokrk0212
AT stintzingsebastian panitumumabplusfluorouracilandfolinicacidversusfluorouracilandfolinicacidaloneasmaintenancetherapyinraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancertherandomizedpanamatrialaiokrk0212
AT trarbachtanja panitumumabplusfluorouracilandfolinicacidversusfluorouracilandfolinicacidaloneasmaintenancetherapyinraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcancertherandomizedpanamatrialaiokrk0212