Cargando…
Gender Differences in Student Participation in an Active-Learning Classroom
Overwhelming evidence demonstrating the benefits of active-learning pedagogy has led to a shift in teaching that requires students to interact more in the classroom. To date, few studies have assessed whether there are gender-specific differences in participation in active-learning science, technolo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Cell Biology
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8697656/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32453677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-03-0048 |
_version_ | 1784620094453710848 |
---|---|
author | Aguillon, Stepfanie M. Siegmund, Gregor-Fausto Petipas, Renee H. Drake, Abby Grace Cotner, Sehoya Ballen, Cissy J. |
author_facet | Aguillon, Stepfanie M. Siegmund, Gregor-Fausto Petipas, Renee H. Drake, Abby Grace Cotner, Sehoya Ballen, Cissy J. |
author_sort | Aguillon, Stepfanie M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Overwhelming evidence demonstrating the benefits of active-learning pedagogy has led to a shift in teaching that requires students to interact more in the classroom. To date, few studies have assessed whether there are gender-specific differences in participation in active-learning science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses, and fewer have looked across different types of classroom participation. Over two semesters, we observed an introductory biology course at a large research-intensive university and categorized student participation into seven distinct categories to identify gender gaps in participation. Additionally, we collected student grades and administered a postcourse survey that gauged student scientific self-efficacy and salience of gender identity. We found that men participated more than expected based on the class composition in most participation categories. In particular, men were strongly overrepresented in voluntary responses after small-group discussions across both semesters. Women in the course reported lower scientific self-efficacy and greater salience of gender identity. Our results suggest that active learning in itself is not a panacea for STEM equity; rather, to maximize the benefits of active-learning pedagogy, instructors should make a concerted effort to use teaching strategies that are inclusive and encourage equitable participation by all students. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8697656 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | American Society for Cell Biology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86976562021-12-30 Gender Differences in Student Participation in an Active-Learning Classroom Aguillon, Stepfanie M. Siegmund, Gregor-Fausto Petipas, Renee H. Drake, Abby Grace Cotner, Sehoya Ballen, Cissy J. CBE Life Sci Educ Article Overwhelming evidence demonstrating the benefits of active-learning pedagogy has led to a shift in teaching that requires students to interact more in the classroom. To date, few studies have assessed whether there are gender-specific differences in participation in active-learning science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses, and fewer have looked across different types of classroom participation. Over two semesters, we observed an introductory biology course at a large research-intensive university and categorized student participation into seven distinct categories to identify gender gaps in participation. Additionally, we collected student grades and administered a postcourse survey that gauged student scientific self-efficacy and salience of gender identity. We found that men participated more than expected based on the class composition in most participation categories. In particular, men were strongly overrepresented in voluntary responses after small-group discussions across both semesters. Women in the course reported lower scientific self-efficacy and greater salience of gender identity. Our results suggest that active learning in itself is not a panacea for STEM equity; rather, to maximize the benefits of active-learning pedagogy, instructors should make a concerted effort to use teaching strategies that are inclusive and encourage equitable participation by all students. American Society for Cell Biology 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC8697656/ /pubmed/32453677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-03-0048 Text en © 2020 S. M. Aguillon, G.-F. Siegmund, et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2020 The American Society for Cell Biology. “ASCB®” and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License. |
spellingShingle | Article Aguillon, Stepfanie M. Siegmund, Gregor-Fausto Petipas, Renee H. Drake, Abby Grace Cotner, Sehoya Ballen, Cissy J. Gender Differences in Student Participation in an Active-Learning Classroom |
title | Gender Differences in Student Participation in an Active-Learning Classroom |
title_full | Gender Differences in Student Participation in an Active-Learning Classroom |
title_fullStr | Gender Differences in Student Participation in an Active-Learning Classroom |
title_full_unstemmed | Gender Differences in Student Participation in an Active-Learning Classroom |
title_short | Gender Differences in Student Participation in an Active-Learning Classroom |
title_sort | gender differences in student participation in an active-learning classroom |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8697656/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32453677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-03-0048 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aguillonstepfaniem genderdifferencesinstudentparticipationinanactivelearningclassroom AT siegmundgregorfausto genderdifferencesinstudentparticipationinanactivelearningclassroom AT petipasreneeh genderdifferencesinstudentparticipationinanactivelearningclassroom AT drakeabbygrace genderdifferencesinstudentparticipationinanactivelearningclassroom AT cotnersehoya genderdifferencesinstudentparticipationinanactivelearningclassroom AT ballencissyj genderdifferencesinstudentparticipationinanactivelearningclassroom |