Cargando…

Gender Differences in Student Participation in an Active-Learning Classroom

Overwhelming evidence demonstrating the benefits of active-learning pedagogy has led to a shift in teaching that requires students to interact more in the classroom. To date, few studies have assessed whether there are gender-specific differences in participation in active-learning science, technolo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aguillon, Stepfanie M., Siegmund, Gregor-Fausto, Petipas, Renee H., Drake, Abby Grace, Cotner, Sehoya, Ballen, Cissy J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Cell Biology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8697656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32453677
http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-03-0048
_version_ 1784620094453710848
author Aguillon, Stepfanie M.
Siegmund, Gregor-Fausto
Petipas, Renee H.
Drake, Abby Grace
Cotner, Sehoya
Ballen, Cissy J.
author_facet Aguillon, Stepfanie M.
Siegmund, Gregor-Fausto
Petipas, Renee H.
Drake, Abby Grace
Cotner, Sehoya
Ballen, Cissy J.
author_sort Aguillon, Stepfanie M.
collection PubMed
description Overwhelming evidence demonstrating the benefits of active-learning pedagogy has led to a shift in teaching that requires students to interact more in the classroom. To date, few studies have assessed whether there are gender-specific differences in participation in active-learning science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses, and fewer have looked across different types of classroom participation. Over two semesters, we observed an introductory biology course at a large research-intensive university and categorized student participation into seven distinct categories to identify gender gaps in participation. Additionally, we collected student grades and administered a postcourse survey that gauged student scientific self-efficacy and salience of gender identity. We found that men participated more than expected based on the class composition in most participation categories. In particular, men were strongly overrepresented in voluntary responses after small-group discussions across both semesters. Women in the course reported lower scientific self-efficacy and greater salience of gender identity. Our results suggest that active learning in itself is not a panacea for STEM equity; rather, to maximize the benefits of active-learning pedagogy, instructors should make a concerted effort to use teaching strategies that are inclusive and encourage equitable participation by all students.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8697656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Society for Cell Biology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86976562021-12-30 Gender Differences in Student Participation in an Active-Learning Classroom Aguillon, Stepfanie M. Siegmund, Gregor-Fausto Petipas, Renee H. Drake, Abby Grace Cotner, Sehoya Ballen, Cissy J. CBE Life Sci Educ Article Overwhelming evidence demonstrating the benefits of active-learning pedagogy has led to a shift in teaching that requires students to interact more in the classroom. To date, few studies have assessed whether there are gender-specific differences in participation in active-learning science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses, and fewer have looked across different types of classroom participation. Over two semesters, we observed an introductory biology course at a large research-intensive university and categorized student participation into seven distinct categories to identify gender gaps in participation. Additionally, we collected student grades and administered a postcourse survey that gauged student scientific self-efficacy and salience of gender identity. We found that men participated more than expected based on the class composition in most participation categories. In particular, men were strongly overrepresented in voluntary responses after small-group discussions across both semesters. Women in the course reported lower scientific self-efficacy and greater salience of gender identity. Our results suggest that active learning in itself is not a panacea for STEM equity; rather, to maximize the benefits of active-learning pedagogy, instructors should make a concerted effort to use teaching strategies that are inclusive and encourage equitable participation by all students. American Society for Cell Biology 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC8697656/ /pubmed/32453677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-03-0048 Text en © 2020 S. M. Aguillon, G.-F. Siegmund, et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2020 The American Society for Cell Biology. “ASCB®” and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License.
spellingShingle Article
Aguillon, Stepfanie M.
Siegmund, Gregor-Fausto
Petipas, Renee H.
Drake, Abby Grace
Cotner, Sehoya
Ballen, Cissy J.
Gender Differences in Student Participation in an Active-Learning Classroom
title Gender Differences in Student Participation in an Active-Learning Classroom
title_full Gender Differences in Student Participation in an Active-Learning Classroom
title_fullStr Gender Differences in Student Participation in an Active-Learning Classroom
title_full_unstemmed Gender Differences in Student Participation in an Active-Learning Classroom
title_short Gender Differences in Student Participation in an Active-Learning Classroom
title_sort gender differences in student participation in an active-learning classroom
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8697656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32453677
http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-03-0048
work_keys_str_mv AT aguillonstepfaniem genderdifferencesinstudentparticipationinanactivelearningclassroom
AT siegmundgregorfausto genderdifferencesinstudentparticipationinanactivelearningclassroom
AT petipasreneeh genderdifferencesinstudentparticipationinanactivelearningclassroom
AT drakeabbygrace genderdifferencesinstudentparticipationinanactivelearningclassroom
AT cotnersehoya genderdifferencesinstudentparticipationinanactivelearningclassroom
AT ballencissyj genderdifferencesinstudentparticipationinanactivelearningclassroom