Cargando…
A Comparative Functional Analysis of Pea Protein and Grass Carp Protein Mixture via Blending and Co-Precipitation
Currently, the application of protein mixture derived from plants and animals is of great interest to the food industry. However, the synergistic effects of isolated protein blends (BL) are not well established. Herein, the development of a more effective method (co-precipitation) for the production...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8701264/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34945588 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10123037 |
_version_ | 1784620958116478976 |
---|---|
author | Zhou, Xiaohu Zhang, Chaohua Cao, Wenhong Zhou, Chunxia Zheng, Huina Zhao, Liangzhong |
author_facet | Zhou, Xiaohu Zhang, Chaohua Cao, Wenhong Zhou, Chunxia Zheng, Huina Zhao, Liangzhong |
author_sort | Zhou, Xiaohu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Currently, the application of protein mixture derived from plants and animals is of great interest to the food industry. However, the synergistic effects of isolated protein blends (BL) are not well established. Herein, the development of a more effective method (co-precipitation) for the production of protein mixtures from pea and grass carp is reported. Pea protein isolate (PPI), grass carp protein isolate (CPI), and pea–carp protein co-precipitates (Co) were prepared via isoelectric solubilization/precipitation using peas and grass carp as raw materials. Meanwhile, the BL was obtained by blending PPI with CPI. In addition, the subunit composition and functional properties of Co and BL were investigated. The results show that the ratios of vicilin to legumin α + β and the soluble aggregates of Co were 2.82- and 1.69-fold higher than that of BL. The surface hydrophobicity of Co was less than that of BL, PPI, and CPI (p < 0.05). The solubility of Co was greater than that of BL, PPI, and CPI (p < 0.05), and the foaming activity was higher than that of BL and CPI (p < 0.05) but slightly lower than that of PPI. In addition, based on the emulsifying activity index, particle size, microstructure, and viscosity, Co had better emulsifying properties than BL, PPI, and CPI. The study not only confirmed that co-precipitation was more effective than blending for the preparation of mixed protein using PPI and CPI but also provided a standard of reference for obtaining a mixture of plant and animal proteins. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8701264 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87012642021-12-24 A Comparative Functional Analysis of Pea Protein and Grass Carp Protein Mixture via Blending and Co-Precipitation Zhou, Xiaohu Zhang, Chaohua Cao, Wenhong Zhou, Chunxia Zheng, Huina Zhao, Liangzhong Foods Article Currently, the application of protein mixture derived from plants and animals is of great interest to the food industry. However, the synergistic effects of isolated protein blends (BL) are not well established. Herein, the development of a more effective method (co-precipitation) for the production of protein mixtures from pea and grass carp is reported. Pea protein isolate (PPI), grass carp protein isolate (CPI), and pea–carp protein co-precipitates (Co) were prepared via isoelectric solubilization/precipitation using peas and grass carp as raw materials. Meanwhile, the BL was obtained by blending PPI with CPI. In addition, the subunit composition and functional properties of Co and BL were investigated. The results show that the ratios of vicilin to legumin α + β and the soluble aggregates of Co were 2.82- and 1.69-fold higher than that of BL. The surface hydrophobicity of Co was less than that of BL, PPI, and CPI (p < 0.05). The solubility of Co was greater than that of BL, PPI, and CPI (p < 0.05), and the foaming activity was higher than that of BL and CPI (p < 0.05) but slightly lower than that of PPI. In addition, based on the emulsifying activity index, particle size, microstructure, and viscosity, Co had better emulsifying properties than BL, PPI, and CPI. The study not only confirmed that co-precipitation was more effective than blending for the preparation of mixed protein using PPI and CPI but also provided a standard of reference for obtaining a mixture of plant and animal proteins. MDPI 2021-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8701264/ /pubmed/34945588 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10123037 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Zhou, Xiaohu Zhang, Chaohua Cao, Wenhong Zhou, Chunxia Zheng, Huina Zhao, Liangzhong A Comparative Functional Analysis of Pea Protein and Grass Carp Protein Mixture via Blending and Co-Precipitation |
title | A Comparative Functional Analysis of Pea Protein and Grass Carp Protein Mixture via Blending and Co-Precipitation |
title_full | A Comparative Functional Analysis of Pea Protein and Grass Carp Protein Mixture via Blending and Co-Precipitation |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Functional Analysis of Pea Protein and Grass Carp Protein Mixture via Blending and Co-Precipitation |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Functional Analysis of Pea Protein and Grass Carp Protein Mixture via Blending and Co-Precipitation |
title_short | A Comparative Functional Analysis of Pea Protein and Grass Carp Protein Mixture via Blending and Co-Precipitation |
title_sort | comparative functional analysis of pea protein and grass carp protein mixture via blending and co-precipitation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8701264/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34945588 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10123037 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhouxiaohu acomparativefunctionalanalysisofpeaproteinandgrasscarpproteinmixtureviablendingandcoprecipitation AT zhangchaohua acomparativefunctionalanalysisofpeaproteinandgrasscarpproteinmixtureviablendingandcoprecipitation AT caowenhong acomparativefunctionalanalysisofpeaproteinandgrasscarpproteinmixtureviablendingandcoprecipitation AT zhouchunxia acomparativefunctionalanalysisofpeaproteinandgrasscarpproteinmixtureviablendingandcoprecipitation AT zhenghuina acomparativefunctionalanalysisofpeaproteinandgrasscarpproteinmixtureviablendingandcoprecipitation AT zhaoliangzhong acomparativefunctionalanalysisofpeaproteinandgrasscarpproteinmixtureviablendingandcoprecipitation AT zhouxiaohu comparativefunctionalanalysisofpeaproteinandgrasscarpproteinmixtureviablendingandcoprecipitation AT zhangchaohua comparativefunctionalanalysisofpeaproteinandgrasscarpproteinmixtureviablendingandcoprecipitation AT caowenhong comparativefunctionalanalysisofpeaproteinandgrasscarpproteinmixtureviablendingandcoprecipitation AT zhouchunxia comparativefunctionalanalysisofpeaproteinandgrasscarpproteinmixtureviablendingandcoprecipitation AT zhenghuina comparativefunctionalanalysisofpeaproteinandgrasscarpproteinmixtureviablendingandcoprecipitation AT zhaoliangzhong comparativefunctionalanalysisofpeaproteinandgrasscarpproteinmixtureviablendingandcoprecipitation |