Cargando…
Adapting Highly-Dynamic Compliant Movements to Changing Environments: A Benchmark Comparison of Reflex- vs. CPG-Based Control Strategies
To control highly-dynamic compliant motions such as running or hopping, vertebrates rely on reflexes and Central Pattern Generators (CPGs) as core strategies. However, decoding how much each strategy contributes to the control and how they are adjusted under different conditions is still a major cha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8709475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34955801 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2021.762431 |
_version_ | 1784622944480133120 |
---|---|
author | Schmidt, Annika Feldotto, Benedikt Gumpert, Thomas Seidel, Daniel Albu-Schäffer, Alin Stratmann, Philipp |
author_facet | Schmidt, Annika Feldotto, Benedikt Gumpert, Thomas Seidel, Daniel Albu-Schäffer, Alin Stratmann, Philipp |
author_sort | Schmidt, Annika |
collection | PubMed |
description | To control highly-dynamic compliant motions such as running or hopping, vertebrates rely on reflexes and Central Pattern Generators (CPGs) as core strategies. However, decoding how much each strategy contributes to the control and how they are adjusted under different conditions is still a major challenge. To help solve this question, the present paper provides a comprehensive comparison of reflexes, CPGs and a commonly used combination of the two applied to a biomimetic robot. It leverages recent findings indicating that in mammals both control principles act within a low-dimensional control submanifold. This substantially reduces the search space of parameters and enables the quantifiable comparison of the different control strategies. The chosen metrics are motion stability and energy efficiency, both key aspects for the evolution of the central nervous system. We find that neither for stability nor energy efficiency it is favorable to apply the state-of-the-art approach of a continuously feedback-adapted CPG. In both aspects, a pure reflex is more effective, but the pure CPG allows easy signal alteration when needed. Additionally, the hardware experiments clearly show that the shape of a control signal has a strong influence on energy efficiency, while previous research usually only focused on frequency alignment. Both findings suggest that currently used methods to combine the advantages of reflexes and CPGs can be improved. In future research, possible combinations of the control strategies should be reconsidered, specifically including the modulation of the control signal's shape. For this endeavor, the presented setup provides a valuable benchmark framework to enable the quantitative comparison of different bioinspired control principles. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8709475 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87094752021-12-25 Adapting Highly-Dynamic Compliant Movements to Changing Environments: A Benchmark Comparison of Reflex- vs. CPG-Based Control Strategies Schmidt, Annika Feldotto, Benedikt Gumpert, Thomas Seidel, Daniel Albu-Schäffer, Alin Stratmann, Philipp Front Neurorobot Neuroscience To control highly-dynamic compliant motions such as running or hopping, vertebrates rely on reflexes and Central Pattern Generators (CPGs) as core strategies. However, decoding how much each strategy contributes to the control and how they are adjusted under different conditions is still a major challenge. To help solve this question, the present paper provides a comprehensive comparison of reflexes, CPGs and a commonly used combination of the two applied to a biomimetic robot. It leverages recent findings indicating that in mammals both control principles act within a low-dimensional control submanifold. This substantially reduces the search space of parameters and enables the quantifiable comparison of the different control strategies. The chosen metrics are motion stability and energy efficiency, both key aspects for the evolution of the central nervous system. We find that neither for stability nor energy efficiency it is favorable to apply the state-of-the-art approach of a continuously feedback-adapted CPG. In both aspects, a pure reflex is more effective, but the pure CPG allows easy signal alteration when needed. Additionally, the hardware experiments clearly show that the shape of a control signal has a strong influence on energy efficiency, while previous research usually only focused on frequency alignment. Both findings suggest that currently used methods to combine the advantages of reflexes and CPGs can be improved. In future research, possible combinations of the control strategies should be reconsidered, specifically including the modulation of the control signal's shape. For this endeavor, the presented setup provides a valuable benchmark framework to enable the quantitative comparison of different bioinspired control principles. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8709475/ /pubmed/34955801 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2021.762431 Text en Copyright © 2021 Schmidt, Feldotto, Gumpert, Seidel, Albu-Schäffer and Stratmann. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Schmidt, Annika Feldotto, Benedikt Gumpert, Thomas Seidel, Daniel Albu-Schäffer, Alin Stratmann, Philipp Adapting Highly-Dynamic Compliant Movements to Changing Environments: A Benchmark Comparison of Reflex- vs. CPG-Based Control Strategies |
title | Adapting Highly-Dynamic Compliant Movements to Changing Environments: A Benchmark Comparison of Reflex- vs. CPG-Based Control Strategies |
title_full | Adapting Highly-Dynamic Compliant Movements to Changing Environments: A Benchmark Comparison of Reflex- vs. CPG-Based Control Strategies |
title_fullStr | Adapting Highly-Dynamic Compliant Movements to Changing Environments: A Benchmark Comparison of Reflex- vs. CPG-Based Control Strategies |
title_full_unstemmed | Adapting Highly-Dynamic Compliant Movements to Changing Environments: A Benchmark Comparison of Reflex- vs. CPG-Based Control Strategies |
title_short | Adapting Highly-Dynamic Compliant Movements to Changing Environments: A Benchmark Comparison of Reflex- vs. CPG-Based Control Strategies |
title_sort | adapting highly-dynamic compliant movements to changing environments: a benchmark comparison of reflex- vs. cpg-based control strategies |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8709475/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34955801 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2021.762431 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schmidtannika adaptinghighlydynamiccompliantmovementstochangingenvironmentsabenchmarkcomparisonofreflexvscpgbasedcontrolstrategies AT feldottobenedikt adaptinghighlydynamiccompliantmovementstochangingenvironmentsabenchmarkcomparisonofreflexvscpgbasedcontrolstrategies AT gumpertthomas adaptinghighlydynamiccompliantmovementstochangingenvironmentsabenchmarkcomparisonofreflexvscpgbasedcontrolstrategies AT seideldaniel adaptinghighlydynamiccompliantmovementstochangingenvironmentsabenchmarkcomparisonofreflexvscpgbasedcontrolstrategies AT albuschafferalin adaptinghighlydynamiccompliantmovementstochangingenvironmentsabenchmarkcomparisonofreflexvscpgbasedcontrolstrategies AT stratmannphilipp adaptinghighlydynamiccompliantmovementstochangingenvironmentsabenchmarkcomparisonofreflexvscpgbasedcontrolstrategies |