Cargando…
Modelling [(18)F]LW223 PET data using simplified imaging protocols for quantification of TSPO expression in the rat heart and brain
PURPOSE: To provide a comprehensive assessment of the novel 18 kDa translocator protein (TSPO) radiotracer, [(18)F]LW223, kinetics in the heart and brain when using a simplified imaging approach. METHODS: Naive adult rats and rats with surgically induced permanent coronary artery ligation received a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8712302/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34338808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05482-1 |
_version_ | 1784623538731220992 |
---|---|
author | MacAskill, Mark G. Wimberley, Catriona Morgan, Timaeus E. F. Alcaide-Corral, Carlos J. Newby, David E. Lucatelli, Christophe Sutherland, Andrew Pimlott, Sally L. Tavares, Adriana A. S. |
author_facet | MacAskill, Mark G. Wimberley, Catriona Morgan, Timaeus E. F. Alcaide-Corral, Carlos J. Newby, David E. Lucatelli, Christophe Sutherland, Andrew Pimlott, Sally L. Tavares, Adriana A. S. |
author_sort | MacAskill, Mark G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To provide a comprehensive assessment of the novel 18 kDa translocator protein (TSPO) radiotracer, [(18)F]LW223, kinetics in the heart and brain when using a simplified imaging approach. METHODS: Naive adult rats and rats with surgically induced permanent coronary artery ligation received a bolus intravenous injection of [(18)F]LW223 followed by 120 min PET scanning with arterial blood sampling throughout. Kinetic modelling of PET data was applied to estimated rate constants, total volume of distribution (V(T)) and binding potential transfer corrected (BP(TC)) using arterial or image-derived input function (IDIF). Quantitative bias of simplified protocols using IDIF versus arterial input function (AIF) and stability of kinetic parameters for PET imaging data of different length (40–120 min) were estimated. RESULTS: PET outcome measures estimated using IDIF significantly correlated with those derived with invasive AIF, albeit with an inherent systematic bias. Truncation of the dynamic PET scan duration to less than 100 min reduced the stability of the kinetic modelling outputs. Quantification of [(18)F]LW223 uptake kinetics in the brain and heart required the use of different outcome measures, with BP(TC) more stable in the heart and V(T) more stable in the brain. CONCLUSION: Modelling of [(18)F]LW223 PET showed the use of simplified IDIF is acceptable in the rat and the minimum scan duration for quantification of TSPO expression in rats using kinetic modelling with this radiotracer is 100 min. Carefully assessing kinetic outcome measures when conducting a systems level as oppose to single-organ centric analyses is crucial. This should be taken into account when assessing the emerging role of the TSPO heart-brain axis in the field of PET imaging. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-021-05482-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8712302 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87123022022-01-11 Modelling [(18)F]LW223 PET data using simplified imaging protocols for quantification of TSPO expression in the rat heart and brain MacAskill, Mark G. Wimberley, Catriona Morgan, Timaeus E. F. Alcaide-Corral, Carlos J. Newby, David E. Lucatelli, Christophe Sutherland, Andrew Pimlott, Sally L. Tavares, Adriana A. S. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Original Article PURPOSE: To provide a comprehensive assessment of the novel 18 kDa translocator protein (TSPO) radiotracer, [(18)F]LW223, kinetics in the heart and brain when using a simplified imaging approach. METHODS: Naive adult rats and rats with surgically induced permanent coronary artery ligation received a bolus intravenous injection of [(18)F]LW223 followed by 120 min PET scanning with arterial blood sampling throughout. Kinetic modelling of PET data was applied to estimated rate constants, total volume of distribution (V(T)) and binding potential transfer corrected (BP(TC)) using arterial or image-derived input function (IDIF). Quantitative bias of simplified protocols using IDIF versus arterial input function (AIF) and stability of kinetic parameters for PET imaging data of different length (40–120 min) were estimated. RESULTS: PET outcome measures estimated using IDIF significantly correlated with those derived with invasive AIF, albeit with an inherent systematic bias. Truncation of the dynamic PET scan duration to less than 100 min reduced the stability of the kinetic modelling outputs. Quantification of [(18)F]LW223 uptake kinetics in the brain and heart required the use of different outcome measures, with BP(TC) more stable in the heart and V(T) more stable in the brain. CONCLUSION: Modelling of [(18)F]LW223 PET showed the use of simplified IDIF is acceptable in the rat and the minimum scan duration for quantification of TSPO expression in rats using kinetic modelling with this radiotracer is 100 min. Carefully assessing kinetic outcome measures when conducting a systems level as oppose to single-organ centric analyses is crucial. This should be taken into account when assessing the emerging role of the TSPO heart-brain axis in the field of PET imaging. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-021-05482-1. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-08-02 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8712302/ /pubmed/34338808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05482-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article MacAskill, Mark G. Wimberley, Catriona Morgan, Timaeus E. F. Alcaide-Corral, Carlos J. Newby, David E. Lucatelli, Christophe Sutherland, Andrew Pimlott, Sally L. Tavares, Adriana A. S. Modelling [(18)F]LW223 PET data using simplified imaging protocols for quantification of TSPO expression in the rat heart and brain |
title | Modelling [(18)F]LW223 PET data using simplified imaging protocols for quantification of TSPO expression in the rat heart and brain |
title_full | Modelling [(18)F]LW223 PET data using simplified imaging protocols for quantification of TSPO expression in the rat heart and brain |
title_fullStr | Modelling [(18)F]LW223 PET data using simplified imaging protocols for quantification of TSPO expression in the rat heart and brain |
title_full_unstemmed | Modelling [(18)F]LW223 PET data using simplified imaging protocols for quantification of TSPO expression in the rat heart and brain |
title_short | Modelling [(18)F]LW223 PET data using simplified imaging protocols for quantification of TSPO expression in the rat heart and brain |
title_sort | modelling [(18)f]lw223 pet data using simplified imaging protocols for quantification of tspo expression in the rat heart and brain |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8712302/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34338808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05482-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT macaskillmarkg modelling18flw223petdatausingsimplifiedimagingprotocolsforquantificationoftspoexpressionintheratheartandbrain AT wimberleycatriona modelling18flw223petdatausingsimplifiedimagingprotocolsforquantificationoftspoexpressionintheratheartandbrain AT morgantimaeusef modelling18flw223petdatausingsimplifiedimagingprotocolsforquantificationoftspoexpressionintheratheartandbrain AT alcaidecorralcarlosj modelling18flw223petdatausingsimplifiedimagingprotocolsforquantificationoftspoexpressionintheratheartandbrain AT newbydavide modelling18flw223petdatausingsimplifiedimagingprotocolsforquantificationoftspoexpressionintheratheartandbrain AT lucatellichristophe modelling18flw223petdatausingsimplifiedimagingprotocolsforquantificationoftspoexpressionintheratheartandbrain AT sutherlandandrew modelling18flw223petdatausingsimplifiedimagingprotocolsforquantificationoftspoexpressionintheratheartandbrain AT pimlottsallyl modelling18flw223petdatausingsimplifiedimagingprotocolsforquantificationoftspoexpressionintheratheartandbrain AT tavaresadrianaas modelling18flw223petdatausingsimplifiedimagingprotocolsforquantificationoftspoexpressionintheratheartandbrain |