Cargando…
The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of redressing differential attainment related to race/ethnicity in medical schools
INTRODUCTION: Systematic and structural inequities in power and privilege create differential attainment whereby differences in average levels of performance are observed between students from different socio-demographic groups. This paper reviews the international evidence on differential attainmen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8714874/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34964930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-021-00696-3 |
_version_ | 1784624021779775488 |
---|---|
author | Fyfe, Molly Horsburgh, Jo Blitz, Julia Chiavaroli, Neville Kumar, Sonia Cleland, Jennifer |
author_facet | Fyfe, Molly Horsburgh, Jo Blitz, Julia Chiavaroli, Neville Kumar, Sonia Cleland, Jennifer |
author_sort | Fyfe, Molly |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Systematic and structural inequities in power and privilege create differential attainment whereby differences in average levels of performance are observed between students from different socio-demographic groups. This paper reviews the international evidence on differential attainment related to ethnicity/race in medical school, drawing together the key messages from research to date to provide guidance for educators to operationalize and enact change and identify areas for further research. METHODS: Authors first identified areas of conceptual importance within differential attainment (learning, assessment, and systems/institutional factors) which were then the focus of a targeted review of the literature on differential attainment related to ethnicity/race in medical education and, where available and relevant, literature from higher education more generally. Each author then conducted a review of the literature and proposed guidelines based on their experience and research literature. The guidelines were iteratively reviewed and refined between all authors until we reached consensus on the Do’s, Don’ts and Don’t Knows. RESULTS: We present 13 guidelines with a summary of the research evidence for each. Guidelines address assessment practices (assessment design, assessment formats, use of assessments and post-hoc analysis) and educational systems and cultures (student experience, learning environment, faculty diversity and diversity practices). CONCLUSIONS: Differential attainment related to ethnicity/race is a complex, systemic problem reflective of unequal norms and practices within broader society and evident throughout assessment practices, the learning environment and student experiences at medical school. Currently, the strongest empirical evidence is around assessment processes themselves. There is emerging evidence of minoritized students facing discrimination and having different learning experiences in medical school, but more studies are needed. There is a pressing need for research on how to effectively redress systemic issues within our medical schools, particularly related to inequity in teaching and learning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8714874 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Bohn Stafleu van Loghum |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87148742021-12-29 The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of redressing differential attainment related to race/ethnicity in medical schools Fyfe, Molly Horsburgh, Jo Blitz, Julia Chiavaroli, Neville Kumar, Sonia Cleland, Jennifer Perspect Med Educ Guidelines INTRODUCTION: Systematic and structural inequities in power and privilege create differential attainment whereby differences in average levels of performance are observed between students from different socio-demographic groups. This paper reviews the international evidence on differential attainment related to ethnicity/race in medical school, drawing together the key messages from research to date to provide guidance for educators to operationalize and enact change and identify areas for further research. METHODS: Authors first identified areas of conceptual importance within differential attainment (learning, assessment, and systems/institutional factors) which were then the focus of a targeted review of the literature on differential attainment related to ethnicity/race in medical education and, where available and relevant, literature from higher education more generally. Each author then conducted a review of the literature and proposed guidelines based on their experience and research literature. The guidelines were iteratively reviewed and refined between all authors until we reached consensus on the Do’s, Don’ts and Don’t Knows. RESULTS: We present 13 guidelines with a summary of the research evidence for each. Guidelines address assessment practices (assessment design, assessment formats, use of assessments and post-hoc analysis) and educational systems and cultures (student experience, learning environment, faculty diversity and diversity practices). CONCLUSIONS: Differential attainment related to ethnicity/race is a complex, systemic problem reflective of unequal norms and practices within broader society and evident throughout assessment practices, the learning environment and student experiences at medical school. Currently, the strongest empirical evidence is around assessment processes themselves. There is emerging evidence of minoritized students facing discrimination and having different learning experiences in medical school, but more studies are needed. There is a pressing need for research on how to effectively redress systemic issues within our medical schools, particularly related to inequity in teaching and learning. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2021-12-29 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8714874/ /pubmed/34964930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-021-00696-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Guidelines Fyfe, Molly Horsburgh, Jo Blitz, Julia Chiavaroli, Neville Kumar, Sonia Cleland, Jennifer The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of redressing differential attainment related to race/ethnicity in medical schools |
title | The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of redressing differential attainment related to race/ethnicity in medical schools |
title_full | The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of redressing differential attainment related to race/ethnicity in medical schools |
title_fullStr | The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of redressing differential attainment related to race/ethnicity in medical schools |
title_full_unstemmed | The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of redressing differential attainment related to race/ethnicity in medical schools |
title_short | The do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of redressing differential attainment related to race/ethnicity in medical schools |
title_sort | do’s, don’ts and don’t knows of redressing differential attainment related to race/ethnicity in medical schools |
topic | Guidelines |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8714874/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34964930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-021-00696-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fyfemolly thedosdontsanddontknowsofredressingdifferentialattainmentrelatedtoraceethnicityinmedicalschools AT horsburghjo thedosdontsanddontknowsofredressingdifferentialattainmentrelatedtoraceethnicityinmedicalschools AT blitzjulia thedosdontsanddontknowsofredressingdifferentialattainmentrelatedtoraceethnicityinmedicalschools AT chiavarolineville thedosdontsanddontknowsofredressingdifferentialattainmentrelatedtoraceethnicityinmedicalschools AT kumarsonia thedosdontsanddontknowsofredressingdifferentialattainmentrelatedtoraceethnicityinmedicalschools AT clelandjennifer thedosdontsanddontknowsofredressingdifferentialattainmentrelatedtoraceethnicityinmedicalschools AT fyfemolly dosdontsanddontknowsofredressingdifferentialattainmentrelatedtoraceethnicityinmedicalschools AT horsburghjo dosdontsanddontknowsofredressingdifferentialattainmentrelatedtoraceethnicityinmedicalschools AT blitzjulia dosdontsanddontknowsofredressingdifferentialattainmentrelatedtoraceethnicityinmedicalschools AT chiavarolineville dosdontsanddontknowsofredressingdifferentialattainmentrelatedtoraceethnicityinmedicalschools AT kumarsonia dosdontsanddontknowsofredressingdifferentialattainmentrelatedtoraceethnicityinmedicalschools AT clelandjennifer dosdontsanddontknowsofredressingdifferentialattainmentrelatedtoraceethnicityinmedicalschools |