Cargando…
Supporting Undergraduate Biology Students’ Academic Success: Comparing Two Workshop Interventions
College students’ performance in introductory-level biology course work is an important predictor of ongoing persistence in the major. This study reports on a researcher–educator partnership that designed and compared two cocurricular workshops. Seventeen laboratory sections of an undergraduate biol...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Cell Biology
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8715789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34605666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-03-0068 |
_version_ | 1784624197123702784 |
---|---|
author | Hensley, Lauren Kulesza, Amy Peri, Joshua Brady, Anna C. Wolters, Christopher A. Sovic, David Breitenberger, Caroline |
author_facet | Hensley, Lauren Kulesza, Amy Peri, Joshua Brady, Anna C. Wolters, Christopher A. Sovic, David Breitenberger, Caroline |
author_sort | Hensley, Lauren |
collection | PubMed |
description | College students’ performance in introductory-level biology course work is an important predictor of ongoing persistence in the major. This study reports on a researcher–educator partnership that designed and compared two cocurricular workshops. Seventeen laboratory sections of an undergraduate biology course were randomly assigned to one of two educational interventions during the regularly scheduled lab class section after students had completed and received the results for the first exam. The baseline Metacognition intervention was an hourlong workshop focused on effective learning strategies and self-awareness in the learning process; the extended Metacognition plus Time Management (Metacognition+TM) intervention included the aforementioned workshop plus a second hourlong workshop on time management and procrastination. Based on three exams and self-report surveys administered before the intervention and at the end of the semester, students who participated in the Metacognition+TM intervention experienced greater increases in their exam scores and degree commitment than those in the baseline intervention. Additionally, group status moderated the effect of the intervention, as the Metacognition+TM intervention was especially effective in increasing use of time management tools by students from minoritized groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8715789 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American Society for Cell Biology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87157892022-01-10 Supporting Undergraduate Biology Students’ Academic Success: Comparing Two Workshop Interventions Hensley, Lauren Kulesza, Amy Peri, Joshua Brady, Anna C. Wolters, Christopher A. Sovic, David Breitenberger, Caroline CBE Life Sci Educ General Essays and Articles College students’ performance in introductory-level biology course work is an important predictor of ongoing persistence in the major. This study reports on a researcher–educator partnership that designed and compared two cocurricular workshops. Seventeen laboratory sections of an undergraduate biology course were randomly assigned to one of two educational interventions during the regularly scheduled lab class section after students had completed and received the results for the first exam. The baseline Metacognition intervention was an hourlong workshop focused on effective learning strategies and self-awareness in the learning process; the extended Metacognition plus Time Management (Metacognition+TM) intervention included the aforementioned workshop plus a second hourlong workshop on time management and procrastination. Based on three exams and self-report surveys administered before the intervention and at the end of the semester, students who participated in the Metacognition+TM intervention experienced greater increases in their exam scores and degree commitment than those in the baseline intervention. Additionally, group status moderated the effect of the intervention, as the Metacognition+TM intervention was especially effective in increasing use of time management tools by students from minoritized groups. American Society for Cell Biology 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8715789/ /pubmed/34605666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-03-0068 Text en © 2021 L. Hensley et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2021 The American Society for Cell Biology. “ASCB®” and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License. |
spellingShingle | General Essays and Articles Hensley, Lauren Kulesza, Amy Peri, Joshua Brady, Anna C. Wolters, Christopher A. Sovic, David Breitenberger, Caroline Supporting Undergraduate Biology Students’ Academic Success: Comparing Two Workshop Interventions |
title | Supporting Undergraduate Biology Students’ Academic Success: Comparing Two Workshop Interventions |
title_full | Supporting Undergraduate Biology Students’ Academic Success: Comparing Two Workshop Interventions |
title_fullStr | Supporting Undergraduate Biology Students’ Academic Success: Comparing Two Workshop Interventions |
title_full_unstemmed | Supporting Undergraduate Biology Students’ Academic Success: Comparing Two Workshop Interventions |
title_short | Supporting Undergraduate Biology Students’ Academic Success: Comparing Two Workshop Interventions |
title_sort | supporting undergraduate biology students’ academic success: comparing two workshop interventions |
topic | General Essays and Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8715789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34605666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-03-0068 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hensleylauren supportingundergraduatebiologystudentsacademicsuccesscomparingtwoworkshopinterventions AT kuleszaamy supportingundergraduatebiologystudentsacademicsuccesscomparingtwoworkshopinterventions AT perijoshua supportingundergraduatebiologystudentsacademicsuccesscomparingtwoworkshopinterventions AT bradyannac supportingundergraduatebiologystudentsacademicsuccesscomparingtwoworkshopinterventions AT wolterschristophera supportingundergraduatebiologystudentsacademicsuccesscomparingtwoworkshopinterventions AT sovicdavid supportingundergraduatebiologystudentsacademicsuccesscomparingtwoworkshopinterventions AT breitenbergercaroline supportingundergraduatebiologystudentsacademicsuccesscomparingtwoworkshopinterventions |