Cargando…
Considerations and strategies for effective online assessment with a focus on the biomedical sciences
The COVID‐19 pandemic in 2020 caused many universities to rapidly transition into online learning and assessment. For many this created a marked shift in design of assessments in an attempt to counteract the lack of invigilation of examinations conducted online. While disruptive for both staff and s...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8728109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35024569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fba.2021-00075 |
_version_ | 1784626662249332736 |
---|---|
author | Mate, Karen Weidenhofer, Judith |
author_facet | Mate, Karen Weidenhofer, Judith |
author_sort | Mate, Karen |
collection | PubMed |
description | The COVID‐19 pandemic in 2020 caused many universities to rapidly transition into online learning and assessment. For many this created a marked shift in design of assessments in an attempt to counteract the lack of invigilation of examinations conducted online. While disruptive for both staff and students, this sudden change provided a much needed reconsideration of the purpose of assessment. This review considers the implications of transitioning to online assessment providing practical strategies for achieving authentic assessment of students online, while ensuring standards and accountability against professional accrediting body requirements. The case study presented demonstrates that an online multiple choice assessment provides similar rigor in assessment to invigilated examination of the same concepts in human physiology. Online assessment has the added benefit of enabling rapid and specific feedback to large cohorts of students on their personal performance, allowing students to target their weaker areas for remediation. This has implications for improving both pedagogy and efficiency in assessment of large cohorts where the default is often to assess basic recall knowledge in a multiple choice assessment. This review examines the key elements for implementation of online assessments including consideration of the role of assessment in teaching and learning, the rationale for online delivery, accessibility of the assessment from both a technical and equity perspective, academic integrity as well as the authenticity and structure of the assessment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8728109 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87281092022-01-11 Considerations and strategies for effective online assessment with a focus on the biomedical sciences Mate, Karen Weidenhofer, Judith FASEB Bioadv Perspective The COVID‐19 pandemic in 2020 caused many universities to rapidly transition into online learning and assessment. For many this created a marked shift in design of assessments in an attempt to counteract the lack of invigilation of examinations conducted online. While disruptive for both staff and students, this sudden change provided a much needed reconsideration of the purpose of assessment. This review considers the implications of transitioning to online assessment providing practical strategies for achieving authentic assessment of students online, while ensuring standards and accountability against professional accrediting body requirements. The case study presented demonstrates that an online multiple choice assessment provides similar rigor in assessment to invigilated examination of the same concepts in human physiology. Online assessment has the added benefit of enabling rapid and specific feedback to large cohorts of students on their personal performance, allowing students to target their weaker areas for remediation. This has implications for improving both pedagogy and efficiency in assessment of large cohorts where the default is often to assess basic recall knowledge in a multiple choice assessment. This review examines the key elements for implementation of online assessments including consideration of the role of assessment in teaching and learning, the rationale for online delivery, accessibility of the assessment from both a technical and equity perspective, academic integrity as well as the authenticity and structure of the assessment. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8728109/ /pubmed/35024569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fba.2021-00075 Text en © 2021 The Authors. FASEB BioAdvances published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Perspective Mate, Karen Weidenhofer, Judith Considerations and strategies for effective online assessment with a focus on the biomedical sciences |
title | Considerations and strategies for effective online assessment with a focus on the biomedical sciences |
title_full | Considerations and strategies for effective online assessment with a focus on the biomedical sciences |
title_fullStr | Considerations and strategies for effective online assessment with a focus on the biomedical sciences |
title_full_unstemmed | Considerations and strategies for effective online assessment with a focus on the biomedical sciences |
title_short | Considerations and strategies for effective online assessment with a focus on the biomedical sciences |
title_sort | considerations and strategies for effective online assessment with a focus on the biomedical sciences |
topic | Perspective |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8728109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35024569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fba.2021-00075 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matekaren considerationsandstrategiesforeffectiveonlineassessmentwithafocusonthebiomedicalsciences AT weidenhoferjudith considerationsandstrategiesforeffectiveonlineassessmentwithafocusonthebiomedicalsciences |