Cargando…

Determinants for intrinsically disordered protein recruitment into phase-separated protein condensates

Multivalent interactions between amino acid residues of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) drive phase separation of these proteins into liquid condensates, forming various membrane-less organelles in cells. These interactions between often biased residues of IDPs are also likely involved in s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jo, Yongsang, Jang, Jinyoung, Song, Daesun, Park, Hyoin, Jung, Yongwon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8729795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35126984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1sc05672g
_version_ 1784627008323452928
author Jo, Yongsang
Jang, Jinyoung
Song, Daesun
Park, Hyoin
Jung, Yongwon
author_facet Jo, Yongsang
Jang, Jinyoung
Song, Daesun
Park, Hyoin
Jung, Yongwon
author_sort Jo, Yongsang
collection PubMed
description Multivalent interactions between amino acid residues of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) drive phase separation of these proteins into liquid condensates, forming various membrane-less organelles in cells. These interactions between often biased residues of IDPs are also likely involved in selective recruitment of many other IDPs into condensates. However, determining factors for this IDP recruitment into protein condensates are not understood yet. Here, we quantitatively examined recruitment tendencies of various IDPs with different sequence compositions into IDP-clustered condensates both in vitro as well as in cells. Condensate-forming IDP scaffolds, recruited IDP clients, and phase separation conditions were carefully varied to find key factors for selective IDP partitioning in protein condensates. Regardless of scaffold sequences, charged residues in client IDPs assured potent IDP recruitment, likely via strong electrostatic interactions, where positive residues could further enhance recruitment, possibly with cation–pi interactions. Notably, poly-ethylene glycol, a widely used crowding reagent for in vitro phase separation, abnormally increased IDP recruitment, indicating the need for careful use of crowding conditions. Tyrosines of IDP clients also strongly participated in recruitment both in vitro and in cells. Lastly, we measured recruitment degrees by more conventional interactions between folded proteins instead of disordered proteins. Surprisingly, recruitment forces by an even moderate protein interaction (K(d) ∼ 5 μM) were substantially stronger than those by natural IDP–IDP interactions. The present data offer valuable information on how cells might organize protein partitioning on various protein condensates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8729795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87297952022-02-04 Determinants for intrinsically disordered protein recruitment into phase-separated protein condensates Jo, Yongsang Jang, Jinyoung Song, Daesun Park, Hyoin Jung, Yongwon Chem Sci Chemistry Multivalent interactions between amino acid residues of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) drive phase separation of these proteins into liquid condensates, forming various membrane-less organelles in cells. These interactions between often biased residues of IDPs are also likely involved in selective recruitment of many other IDPs into condensates. However, determining factors for this IDP recruitment into protein condensates are not understood yet. Here, we quantitatively examined recruitment tendencies of various IDPs with different sequence compositions into IDP-clustered condensates both in vitro as well as in cells. Condensate-forming IDP scaffolds, recruited IDP clients, and phase separation conditions were carefully varied to find key factors for selective IDP partitioning in protein condensates. Regardless of scaffold sequences, charged residues in client IDPs assured potent IDP recruitment, likely via strong electrostatic interactions, where positive residues could further enhance recruitment, possibly with cation–pi interactions. Notably, poly-ethylene glycol, a widely used crowding reagent for in vitro phase separation, abnormally increased IDP recruitment, indicating the need for careful use of crowding conditions. Tyrosines of IDP clients also strongly participated in recruitment both in vitro and in cells. Lastly, we measured recruitment degrees by more conventional interactions between folded proteins instead of disordered proteins. Surprisingly, recruitment forces by an even moderate protein interaction (K(d) ∼ 5 μM) were substantially stronger than those by natural IDP–IDP interactions. The present data offer valuable information on how cells might organize protein partitioning on various protein condensates. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8729795/ /pubmed/35126984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1sc05672g Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Chemistry
Jo, Yongsang
Jang, Jinyoung
Song, Daesun
Park, Hyoin
Jung, Yongwon
Determinants for intrinsically disordered protein recruitment into phase-separated protein condensates
title Determinants for intrinsically disordered protein recruitment into phase-separated protein condensates
title_full Determinants for intrinsically disordered protein recruitment into phase-separated protein condensates
title_fullStr Determinants for intrinsically disordered protein recruitment into phase-separated protein condensates
title_full_unstemmed Determinants for intrinsically disordered protein recruitment into phase-separated protein condensates
title_short Determinants for intrinsically disordered protein recruitment into phase-separated protein condensates
title_sort determinants for intrinsically disordered protein recruitment into phase-separated protein condensates
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8729795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35126984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1sc05672g
work_keys_str_mv AT joyongsang determinantsforintrinsicallydisorderedproteinrecruitmentintophaseseparatedproteincondensates
AT jangjinyoung determinantsforintrinsicallydisorderedproteinrecruitmentintophaseseparatedproteincondensates
AT songdaesun determinantsforintrinsicallydisorderedproteinrecruitmentintophaseseparatedproteincondensates
AT parkhyoin determinantsforintrinsicallydisorderedproteinrecruitmentintophaseseparatedproteincondensates
AT jungyongwon determinantsforintrinsicallydisorderedproteinrecruitmentintophaseseparatedproteincondensates