Cargando…

The application of the tracer method with peer observation and formative feedback for professional development in clinical practice: a scoping review

INTRODUCTION: The tracer method, commonly used for quality assessment, can also be used as a tool for peer observation and formative feedback on professional development. This scoping review describes how, by whom, and with what effect the tracer method is applied as a formative professional develop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steenbruggen, Rudi A., Maas, Marjo J. M., Hoogeboom, Thomas J., Brand, Paul L. P., van der Wees, Philip J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8733089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34762266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-021-00693-6
_version_ 1784627731912196096
author Steenbruggen, Rudi A.
Maas, Marjo J. M.
Hoogeboom, Thomas J.
Brand, Paul L. P.
van der Wees, Philip J.
author_facet Steenbruggen, Rudi A.
Maas, Marjo J. M.
Hoogeboom, Thomas J.
Brand, Paul L. P.
van der Wees, Philip J.
author_sort Steenbruggen, Rudi A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The tracer method, commonly used for quality assessment, can also be used as a tool for peer observation and formative feedback on professional development. This scoping review describes how, by whom, and with what effect the tracer method is applied as a formative professional development instrument between healthcare professionals of equal status and aims to identify the types of scientific evidence for this use of the tracer method. METHODS: The authors searched four electronic databases for eligible articles, which were screened and assessed for eligibility by two independent researchers. From eligible studies, data were extracted to summarize, collate, and make a narrative account of the findings. RESULTS: The electronic search yielded 1757 unique studies, eight of which were included as valid and relevant to our aim: five qualitative, two mixed methods, and one quantitative study. Seven studies took place in hospitals and one in general practice. The tracer method was used mainly as a form of peer observation and formative feedback. Most studies evaluated the tracer method’s feasibility and its impact on professional development. All but one study reported positive effects: participants described the tracer method generally as being valuable and worth continuing. DISCUSSION: Although the body of evidence is small and largely limited to the hospital setting, using the tracer method for peer observation and formative feedback between healthcare professionals of equal status appears sufficiently useful to merit further rigorous evaluation and implementation in continuous professional development in healthcare. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40037-021-00693-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8733089
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87330892022-01-18 The application of the tracer method with peer observation and formative feedback for professional development in clinical practice: a scoping review Steenbruggen, Rudi A. Maas, Marjo J. M. Hoogeboom, Thomas J. Brand, Paul L. P. van der Wees, Philip J. Perspect Med Educ Review Article INTRODUCTION: The tracer method, commonly used for quality assessment, can also be used as a tool for peer observation and formative feedback on professional development. This scoping review describes how, by whom, and with what effect the tracer method is applied as a formative professional development instrument between healthcare professionals of equal status and aims to identify the types of scientific evidence for this use of the tracer method. METHODS: The authors searched four electronic databases for eligible articles, which were screened and assessed for eligibility by two independent researchers. From eligible studies, data were extracted to summarize, collate, and make a narrative account of the findings. RESULTS: The electronic search yielded 1757 unique studies, eight of which were included as valid and relevant to our aim: five qualitative, two mixed methods, and one quantitative study. Seven studies took place in hospitals and one in general practice. The tracer method was used mainly as a form of peer observation and formative feedback. Most studies evaluated the tracer method’s feasibility and its impact on professional development. All but one study reported positive effects: participants described the tracer method generally as being valuable and worth continuing. DISCUSSION: Although the body of evidence is small and largely limited to the hospital setting, using the tracer method for peer observation and formative feedback between healthcare professionals of equal status appears sufficiently useful to merit further rigorous evaluation and implementation in continuous professional development in healthcare. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40037-021-00693-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2021-11-11 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8733089/ /pubmed/34762266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-021-00693-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Steenbruggen, Rudi A.
Maas, Marjo J. M.
Hoogeboom, Thomas J.
Brand, Paul L. P.
van der Wees, Philip J.
The application of the tracer method with peer observation and formative feedback for professional development in clinical practice: a scoping review
title The application of the tracer method with peer observation and formative feedback for professional development in clinical practice: a scoping review
title_full The application of the tracer method with peer observation and formative feedback for professional development in clinical practice: a scoping review
title_fullStr The application of the tracer method with peer observation and formative feedback for professional development in clinical practice: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed The application of the tracer method with peer observation and formative feedback for professional development in clinical practice: a scoping review
title_short The application of the tracer method with peer observation and formative feedback for professional development in clinical practice: a scoping review
title_sort application of the tracer method with peer observation and formative feedback for professional development in clinical practice: a scoping review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8733089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34762266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-021-00693-6
work_keys_str_mv AT steenbruggenrudia theapplicationofthetracermethodwithpeerobservationandformativefeedbackforprofessionaldevelopmentinclinicalpracticeascopingreview
AT maasmarjojm theapplicationofthetracermethodwithpeerobservationandformativefeedbackforprofessionaldevelopmentinclinicalpracticeascopingreview
AT hoogeboomthomasj theapplicationofthetracermethodwithpeerobservationandformativefeedbackforprofessionaldevelopmentinclinicalpracticeascopingreview
AT brandpaullp theapplicationofthetracermethodwithpeerobservationandformativefeedbackforprofessionaldevelopmentinclinicalpracticeascopingreview
AT vanderweesphilipj theapplicationofthetracermethodwithpeerobservationandformativefeedbackforprofessionaldevelopmentinclinicalpracticeascopingreview
AT steenbruggenrudia applicationofthetracermethodwithpeerobservationandformativefeedbackforprofessionaldevelopmentinclinicalpracticeascopingreview
AT maasmarjojm applicationofthetracermethodwithpeerobservationandformativefeedbackforprofessionaldevelopmentinclinicalpracticeascopingreview
AT hoogeboomthomasj applicationofthetracermethodwithpeerobservationandformativefeedbackforprofessionaldevelopmentinclinicalpracticeascopingreview
AT brandpaullp applicationofthetracermethodwithpeerobservationandformativefeedbackforprofessionaldevelopmentinclinicalpracticeascopingreview
AT vanderweesphilipj applicationofthetracermethodwithpeerobservationandformativefeedbackforprofessionaldevelopmentinclinicalpracticeascopingreview