Cargando…
Student Perceptions of Instructor Supportiveness: What Characteristics Make a Difference?
The use of active learning in the undergraduate biology classroom improves student learning and classroom equity, but its use can lead to student anxiety. Instructors can reduce student anxiety through practices that convey supportiveness and valuing of students. We collected students’ ratings of th...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Cell Biology
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8734384/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33938766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-10-0238 |
_version_ | 1784628007448608768 |
---|---|
author | Schussler, Elisabeth E. Weatherton, Maryrose Chen Musgrove, Miranda M. Brigati, Jennifer R. England, Benjamin J. |
author_facet | Schussler, Elisabeth E. Weatherton, Maryrose Chen Musgrove, Miranda M. Brigati, Jennifer R. England, Benjamin J. |
author_sort | Schussler, Elisabeth E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use of active learning in the undergraduate biology classroom improves student learning and classroom equity, but its use can lead to student anxiety. Instructors can reduce student anxiety through practices that convey supportiveness and valuing of students. We collected students’ ratings of their classroom anxiety and perceptions of their instructors’ supportiveness, as well as open-response reasons for their ratings, in six large introductory biology classes. These data confirmed a negative relationship between student anxiety and student perceptions of their instructors’ support. We used qualitative analysis to identify themes of instructor support and how these themes varied between instructors rated as providing higher or lower support by their students. Two instructors with higher-support ratings and two with lower-support ratings were selected for analyses. Inductive qualitative coding identified five themes of instructor support: relational (perception of caring/approachability), instrumental (offering resources), pedagogical (quality of teaching), personality, and uncertain (not sure of support). Higher-support instructors had more positive relational themes and fewer negative pedagogical themes compared with lower-support instructors. These results can be used to enhance supportive classroom practices, which may be one mechanism to reduce student anxiety. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8734384 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American Society for Cell Biology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87343842022-01-10 Student Perceptions of Instructor Supportiveness: What Characteristics Make a Difference? Schussler, Elisabeth E. Weatherton, Maryrose Chen Musgrove, Miranda M. Brigati, Jennifer R. England, Benjamin J. CBE Life Sci Educ Articles The use of active learning in the undergraduate biology classroom improves student learning and classroom equity, but its use can lead to student anxiety. Instructors can reduce student anxiety through practices that convey supportiveness and valuing of students. We collected students’ ratings of their classroom anxiety and perceptions of their instructors’ supportiveness, as well as open-response reasons for their ratings, in six large introductory biology classes. These data confirmed a negative relationship between student anxiety and student perceptions of their instructors’ support. We used qualitative analysis to identify themes of instructor support and how these themes varied between instructors rated as providing higher or lower support by their students. Two instructors with higher-support ratings and two with lower-support ratings were selected for analyses. Inductive qualitative coding identified five themes of instructor support: relational (perception of caring/approachability), instrumental (offering resources), pedagogical (quality of teaching), personality, and uncertain (not sure of support). Higher-support instructors had more positive relational themes and fewer negative pedagogical themes compared with lower-support instructors. These results can be used to enhance supportive classroom practices, which may be one mechanism to reduce student anxiety. American Society for Cell Biology 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8734384/ /pubmed/33938766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-10-0238 Text en © 2021 E. E. Schussler et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2021 The American Society for Cell Biology. “ASCB®” and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License. |
spellingShingle | Articles Schussler, Elisabeth E. Weatherton, Maryrose Chen Musgrove, Miranda M. Brigati, Jennifer R. England, Benjamin J. Student Perceptions of Instructor Supportiveness: What Characteristics Make a Difference? |
title | Student Perceptions of Instructor Supportiveness: What Characteristics Make a Difference? |
title_full | Student Perceptions of Instructor Supportiveness: What Characteristics Make a Difference? |
title_fullStr | Student Perceptions of Instructor Supportiveness: What Characteristics Make a Difference? |
title_full_unstemmed | Student Perceptions of Instructor Supportiveness: What Characteristics Make a Difference? |
title_short | Student Perceptions of Instructor Supportiveness: What Characteristics Make a Difference? |
title_sort | student perceptions of instructor supportiveness: what characteristics make a difference? |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8734384/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33938766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-10-0238 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schusslerelisabethe studentperceptionsofinstructorsupportivenesswhatcharacteristicsmakeadifference AT weathertonmaryrose studentperceptionsofinstructorsupportivenesswhatcharacteristicsmakeadifference AT chenmusgrovemirandam studentperceptionsofinstructorsupportivenesswhatcharacteristicsmakeadifference AT brigatijenniferr studentperceptionsofinstructorsupportivenesswhatcharacteristicsmakeadifference AT englandbenjaminj studentperceptionsofinstructorsupportivenesswhatcharacteristicsmakeadifference |