Cargando…

Brief, Written Reflections Improve Interest of Introductory Animal Science Undergraduates

In addition to stimulating interest through experiential means, educators can support interest development through structured reflection. Our randomized controlled intervention study assessed the effectiveness of 10-minute written utility-value reflections designed to enhance the interest of introdu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Erickson, MaryGrace, Wattiaux, Michel A., Marks, Danielle, Karcher, Elizabeth L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Cell Biology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8734397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33938765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-08-0164
_version_ 1784628010764206080
author Erickson, MaryGrace
Wattiaux, Michel A.
Marks, Danielle
Karcher, Elizabeth L.
author_facet Erickson, MaryGrace
Wattiaux, Michel A.
Marks, Danielle
Karcher, Elizabeth L.
author_sort Erickson, MaryGrace
collection PubMed
description In addition to stimulating interest through experiential means, educators can support interest development through structured reflection. Our randomized controlled intervention study assessed the effectiveness of 10-minute written utility-value reflections designed to enhance the interest of introductory animal science students. During the Spring 2019 semester, we randomly assigned participating students into two blocks, utility-value reflection (n = 39) and control (n = 34), at the beginning of the course. In week 6 during the 16-week semester, students completed corresponding tasks: either written reflections on the personal value of course laboratory material or a control picture-summarization task. Results showed that the utility-value reflection intervention tended to improve situational interest and was most effective for students with low pretest individual interest. Neither the intervention nor the interest variable predicted course performance. In utility-value reflection responses, we catalogued themes aligned with a range of task-value components beyond utility-value. Our results reinforce previous work indicating that utility-value reflections support low individual interest students in developing academic motivation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8734397
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Society for Cell Biology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87343972022-01-10 Brief, Written Reflections Improve Interest of Introductory Animal Science Undergraduates Erickson, MaryGrace Wattiaux, Michel A. Marks, Danielle Karcher, Elizabeth L. CBE Life Sci Educ Articles In addition to stimulating interest through experiential means, educators can support interest development through structured reflection. Our randomized controlled intervention study assessed the effectiveness of 10-minute written utility-value reflections designed to enhance the interest of introductory animal science students. During the Spring 2019 semester, we randomly assigned participating students into two blocks, utility-value reflection (n = 39) and control (n = 34), at the beginning of the course. In week 6 during the 16-week semester, students completed corresponding tasks: either written reflections on the personal value of course laboratory material or a control picture-summarization task. Results showed that the utility-value reflection intervention tended to improve situational interest and was most effective for students with low pretest individual interest. Neither the intervention nor the interest variable predicted course performance. In utility-value reflection responses, we catalogued themes aligned with a range of task-value components beyond utility-value. Our results reinforce previous work indicating that utility-value reflections support low individual interest students in developing academic motivation. American Society for Cell Biology 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8734397/ /pubmed/33938765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-08-0164 Text en © 2021 M. G. Erickson et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2021 The American Society for Cell Biology. “ASCB®” and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License.
spellingShingle Articles
Erickson, MaryGrace
Wattiaux, Michel A.
Marks, Danielle
Karcher, Elizabeth L.
Brief, Written Reflections Improve Interest of Introductory Animal Science Undergraduates
title Brief, Written Reflections Improve Interest of Introductory Animal Science Undergraduates
title_full Brief, Written Reflections Improve Interest of Introductory Animal Science Undergraduates
title_fullStr Brief, Written Reflections Improve Interest of Introductory Animal Science Undergraduates
title_full_unstemmed Brief, Written Reflections Improve Interest of Introductory Animal Science Undergraduates
title_short Brief, Written Reflections Improve Interest of Introductory Animal Science Undergraduates
title_sort brief, written reflections improve interest of introductory animal science undergraduates
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8734397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33938765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-08-0164
work_keys_str_mv AT ericksonmarygrace briefwrittenreflectionsimproveinterestofintroductoryanimalscienceundergraduates
AT wattiauxmichela briefwrittenreflectionsimproveinterestofintroductoryanimalscienceundergraduates
AT marksdanielle briefwrittenreflectionsimproveinterestofintroductoryanimalscienceundergraduates
AT karcherelizabethl briefwrittenreflectionsimproveinterestofintroductoryanimalscienceundergraduates