Cargando…

Do We Have a Trust Problem? Exploring Undergraduate Student Views on the Tentativeness and Trustworthiness of Science

Science includes the fundamental attributes of durability and uncertainty; hence, we teach about the “tentative yet durable” nature of science. Public discourse can be different, where one hears both confidence about “settled science” and doubts about “just theories.” The latter observation gives ri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cobern, William W., Adams, Betty AJ, Pleasants, Brandy A-S., Bentley, Andrew, Kagumba, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8742715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35035099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00292-1
_version_ 1784629776748642304
author Cobern, William W.
Adams, Betty AJ
Pleasants, Brandy A-S.
Bentley, Andrew
Kagumba, Robert
author_facet Cobern, William W.
Adams, Betty AJ
Pleasants, Brandy A-S.
Bentley, Andrew
Kagumba, Robert
author_sort Cobern, William W.
collection PubMed
description Science includes the fundamental attributes of durability and uncertainty; hence, we teach about the “tentative yet durable” nature of science. Public discourse can be different, where one hears both confidence about “settled science” and doubts about “just theories.” The latter observation gives rise to the possibility that emphasis on learning the tentative nature of science offers some people the actionable option of declining to accept canonical science. Our paper reports the findings from initial and replication exploratory studies involving about 500 preservice, elementary/middle school teacher education students at a large Midwestern public university. Using a survey method that included opportunities for student comments, the study tested hypotheses about confidence in the veracity, durability, tentativeness, and trustworthiness of science. We found that most students embrace noncontroversial science as correct, and that almost all embraced the tentative nature of science regardless of what they thought about controversial topics. However, when asked about the trustworthiness of science, many students were not willing to say that they trust scientific knowledge. Even students strongly supportive of science, including controversial science, responded similarly. And why did they say that science is not trustworthy? The explanation echoed by many students was that scientific knowledge is tentative. Our paper concludes with implications for instruction and research. Our findings suggest that it would be prudent for science educators to increase instructional focus on the relationship between data and evidence that leads to the durability of scientific knowledge. Future research needs to thoroughly investigate the public interpretation of what we teach about the nature and characteristics of science, and for the implications it might have on how scientific knowledge is or is not incorporated in the development and implementation of public policy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8742715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87427152022-01-10 Do We Have a Trust Problem? Exploring Undergraduate Student Views on the Tentativeness and Trustworthiness of Science Cobern, William W. Adams, Betty AJ Pleasants, Brandy A-S. Bentley, Andrew Kagumba, Robert Sci Educ (Dordr) SI: Why Trust Science and Science Education Science includes the fundamental attributes of durability and uncertainty; hence, we teach about the “tentative yet durable” nature of science. Public discourse can be different, where one hears both confidence about “settled science” and doubts about “just theories.” The latter observation gives rise to the possibility that emphasis on learning the tentative nature of science offers some people the actionable option of declining to accept canonical science. Our paper reports the findings from initial and replication exploratory studies involving about 500 preservice, elementary/middle school teacher education students at a large Midwestern public university. Using a survey method that included opportunities for student comments, the study tested hypotheses about confidence in the veracity, durability, tentativeness, and trustworthiness of science. We found that most students embrace noncontroversial science as correct, and that almost all embraced the tentative nature of science regardless of what they thought about controversial topics. However, when asked about the trustworthiness of science, many students were not willing to say that they trust scientific knowledge. Even students strongly supportive of science, including controversial science, responded similarly. And why did they say that science is not trustworthy? The explanation echoed by many students was that scientific knowledge is tentative. Our paper concludes with implications for instruction and research. Our findings suggest that it would be prudent for science educators to increase instructional focus on the relationship between data and evidence that leads to the durability of scientific knowledge. Future research needs to thoroughly investigate the public interpretation of what we teach about the nature and characteristics of science, and for the implications it might have on how scientific knowledge is or is not incorporated in the development and implementation of public policy. Springer Netherlands 2022-01-09 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8742715/ /pubmed/35035099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00292-1 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle SI: Why Trust Science and Science Education
Cobern, William W.
Adams, Betty AJ
Pleasants, Brandy A-S.
Bentley, Andrew
Kagumba, Robert
Do We Have a Trust Problem? Exploring Undergraduate Student Views on the Tentativeness and Trustworthiness of Science
title Do We Have a Trust Problem? Exploring Undergraduate Student Views on the Tentativeness and Trustworthiness of Science
title_full Do We Have a Trust Problem? Exploring Undergraduate Student Views on the Tentativeness and Trustworthiness of Science
title_fullStr Do We Have a Trust Problem? Exploring Undergraduate Student Views on the Tentativeness and Trustworthiness of Science
title_full_unstemmed Do We Have a Trust Problem? Exploring Undergraduate Student Views on the Tentativeness and Trustworthiness of Science
title_short Do We Have a Trust Problem? Exploring Undergraduate Student Views on the Tentativeness and Trustworthiness of Science
title_sort do we have a trust problem? exploring undergraduate student views on the tentativeness and trustworthiness of science
topic SI: Why Trust Science and Science Education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8742715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35035099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00292-1
work_keys_str_mv AT cobernwilliamw dowehaveatrustproblemexploringundergraduatestudentviewsonthetentativenessandtrustworthinessofscience
AT adamsbettyaj dowehaveatrustproblemexploringundergraduatestudentviewsonthetentativenessandtrustworthinessofscience
AT pleasantsbrandyas dowehaveatrustproblemexploringundergraduatestudentviewsonthetentativenessandtrustworthinessofscience
AT bentleyandrew dowehaveatrustproblemexploringundergraduatestudentviewsonthetentativenessandtrustworthinessofscience
AT kagumbarobert dowehaveatrustproblemexploringundergraduatestudentviewsonthetentativenessandtrustworthinessofscience