Cargando…
Do We Have a Trust Problem? Exploring Undergraduate Student Views on the Tentativeness and Trustworthiness of Science
Science includes the fundamental attributes of durability and uncertainty; hence, we teach about the “tentative yet durable” nature of science. Public discourse can be different, where one hears both confidence about “settled science” and doubts about “just theories.” The latter observation gives ri...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8742715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35035099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00292-1 |
_version_ | 1784629776748642304 |
---|---|
author | Cobern, William W. Adams, Betty AJ Pleasants, Brandy A-S. Bentley, Andrew Kagumba, Robert |
author_facet | Cobern, William W. Adams, Betty AJ Pleasants, Brandy A-S. Bentley, Andrew Kagumba, Robert |
author_sort | Cobern, William W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Science includes the fundamental attributes of durability and uncertainty; hence, we teach about the “tentative yet durable” nature of science. Public discourse can be different, where one hears both confidence about “settled science” and doubts about “just theories.” The latter observation gives rise to the possibility that emphasis on learning the tentative nature of science offers some people the actionable option of declining to accept canonical science. Our paper reports the findings from initial and replication exploratory studies involving about 500 preservice, elementary/middle school teacher education students at a large Midwestern public university. Using a survey method that included opportunities for student comments, the study tested hypotheses about confidence in the veracity, durability, tentativeness, and trustworthiness of science. We found that most students embrace noncontroversial science as correct, and that almost all embraced the tentative nature of science regardless of what they thought about controversial topics. However, when asked about the trustworthiness of science, many students were not willing to say that they trust scientific knowledge. Even students strongly supportive of science, including controversial science, responded similarly. And why did they say that science is not trustworthy? The explanation echoed by many students was that scientific knowledge is tentative. Our paper concludes with implications for instruction and research. Our findings suggest that it would be prudent for science educators to increase instructional focus on the relationship between data and evidence that leads to the durability of scientific knowledge. Future research needs to thoroughly investigate the public interpretation of what we teach about the nature and characteristics of science, and for the implications it might have on how scientific knowledge is or is not incorporated in the development and implementation of public policy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8742715 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87427152022-01-10 Do We Have a Trust Problem? Exploring Undergraduate Student Views on the Tentativeness and Trustworthiness of Science Cobern, William W. Adams, Betty AJ Pleasants, Brandy A-S. Bentley, Andrew Kagumba, Robert Sci Educ (Dordr) SI: Why Trust Science and Science Education Science includes the fundamental attributes of durability and uncertainty; hence, we teach about the “tentative yet durable” nature of science. Public discourse can be different, where one hears both confidence about “settled science” and doubts about “just theories.” The latter observation gives rise to the possibility that emphasis on learning the tentative nature of science offers some people the actionable option of declining to accept canonical science. Our paper reports the findings from initial and replication exploratory studies involving about 500 preservice, elementary/middle school teacher education students at a large Midwestern public university. Using a survey method that included opportunities for student comments, the study tested hypotheses about confidence in the veracity, durability, tentativeness, and trustworthiness of science. We found that most students embrace noncontroversial science as correct, and that almost all embraced the tentative nature of science regardless of what they thought about controversial topics. However, when asked about the trustworthiness of science, many students were not willing to say that they trust scientific knowledge. Even students strongly supportive of science, including controversial science, responded similarly. And why did they say that science is not trustworthy? The explanation echoed by many students was that scientific knowledge is tentative. Our paper concludes with implications for instruction and research. Our findings suggest that it would be prudent for science educators to increase instructional focus on the relationship between data and evidence that leads to the durability of scientific knowledge. Future research needs to thoroughly investigate the public interpretation of what we teach about the nature and characteristics of science, and for the implications it might have on how scientific knowledge is or is not incorporated in the development and implementation of public policy. Springer Netherlands 2022-01-09 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8742715/ /pubmed/35035099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00292-1 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | SI: Why Trust Science and Science Education Cobern, William W. Adams, Betty AJ Pleasants, Brandy A-S. Bentley, Andrew Kagumba, Robert Do We Have a Trust Problem? Exploring Undergraduate Student Views on the Tentativeness and Trustworthiness of Science |
title | Do We Have a Trust Problem? Exploring Undergraduate Student Views on the Tentativeness and Trustworthiness of Science |
title_full | Do We Have a Trust Problem? Exploring Undergraduate Student Views on the Tentativeness and Trustworthiness of Science |
title_fullStr | Do We Have a Trust Problem? Exploring Undergraduate Student Views on the Tentativeness and Trustworthiness of Science |
title_full_unstemmed | Do We Have a Trust Problem? Exploring Undergraduate Student Views on the Tentativeness and Trustworthiness of Science |
title_short | Do We Have a Trust Problem? Exploring Undergraduate Student Views on the Tentativeness and Trustworthiness of Science |
title_sort | do we have a trust problem? exploring undergraduate student views on the tentativeness and trustworthiness of science |
topic | SI: Why Trust Science and Science Education |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8742715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35035099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00292-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cobernwilliamw dowehaveatrustproblemexploringundergraduatestudentviewsonthetentativenessandtrustworthinessofscience AT adamsbettyaj dowehaveatrustproblemexploringundergraduatestudentviewsonthetentativenessandtrustworthinessofscience AT pleasantsbrandyas dowehaveatrustproblemexploringundergraduatestudentviewsonthetentativenessandtrustworthinessofscience AT bentleyandrew dowehaveatrustproblemexploringundergraduatestudentviewsonthetentativenessandtrustworthinessofscience AT kagumbarobert dowehaveatrustproblemexploringundergraduatestudentviewsonthetentativenessandtrustworthinessofscience |