Cargando…
Pros and Cons of Pharmacological Manipulation of cGMP-PDEs in the Prevention and Treatment of Breast Cancer
The cyclic nucleotides, cAMP and cGMP, are ubiquitous second messengers responsible for translating extracellular signals to intracellular biological responses in both normal and tumor cells. When these signals are aberrant or missing, cells may undergo neoplastic transformation or become resistant...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8745278/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35008687 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010262 |
_version_ | 1784630306609823744 |
---|---|
author | Di Iorio, Patrizia Ronci, Maurizio Giuliani, Patricia Caciagli, Francesco Ciccarelli, Renata Caruso, Vanni Beggiato, Sarah Zuccarini, Mariachiara |
author_facet | Di Iorio, Patrizia Ronci, Maurizio Giuliani, Patricia Caciagli, Francesco Ciccarelli, Renata Caruso, Vanni Beggiato, Sarah Zuccarini, Mariachiara |
author_sort | Di Iorio, Patrizia |
collection | PubMed |
description | The cyclic nucleotides, cAMP and cGMP, are ubiquitous second messengers responsible for translating extracellular signals to intracellular biological responses in both normal and tumor cells. When these signals are aberrant or missing, cells may undergo neoplastic transformation or become resistant to chemotherapy. cGMP-hydrolyzing phosphodiesterases (PDEs) are attracting tremendous interest as drug targets for many diseases, including cancer, where they regulate cell growth, apoptosis and sensitization to radio- and chemotherapy. In breast cancer, PDE5 inhibition is associated with increased intracellular cGMP levels, which is responsible for the phosphorylation of PKG and other downstream molecules involved in cell proliferation or apoptosis. In this review, we provide an overview of the most relevant studies regarding the controversial role of PDE inhibitors as off-label adjuvants in cancer therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8745278 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87452782022-01-11 Pros and Cons of Pharmacological Manipulation of cGMP-PDEs in the Prevention and Treatment of Breast Cancer Di Iorio, Patrizia Ronci, Maurizio Giuliani, Patricia Caciagli, Francesco Ciccarelli, Renata Caruso, Vanni Beggiato, Sarah Zuccarini, Mariachiara Int J Mol Sci Review The cyclic nucleotides, cAMP and cGMP, are ubiquitous second messengers responsible for translating extracellular signals to intracellular biological responses in both normal and tumor cells. When these signals are aberrant or missing, cells may undergo neoplastic transformation or become resistant to chemotherapy. cGMP-hydrolyzing phosphodiesterases (PDEs) are attracting tremendous interest as drug targets for many diseases, including cancer, where they regulate cell growth, apoptosis and sensitization to radio- and chemotherapy. In breast cancer, PDE5 inhibition is associated with increased intracellular cGMP levels, which is responsible for the phosphorylation of PKG and other downstream molecules involved in cell proliferation or apoptosis. In this review, we provide an overview of the most relevant studies regarding the controversial role of PDE inhibitors as off-label adjuvants in cancer therapy. MDPI 2021-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8745278/ /pubmed/35008687 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010262 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Di Iorio, Patrizia Ronci, Maurizio Giuliani, Patricia Caciagli, Francesco Ciccarelli, Renata Caruso, Vanni Beggiato, Sarah Zuccarini, Mariachiara Pros and Cons of Pharmacological Manipulation of cGMP-PDEs in the Prevention and Treatment of Breast Cancer |
title | Pros and Cons of Pharmacological Manipulation of cGMP-PDEs in the Prevention and Treatment of Breast Cancer |
title_full | Pros and Cons of Pharmacological Manipulation of cGMP-PDEs in the Prevention and Treatment of Breast Cancer |
title_fullStr | Pros and Cons of Pharmacological Manipulation of cGMP-PDEs in the Prevention and Treatment of Breast Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Pros and Cons of Pharmacological Manipulation of cGMP-PDEs in the Prevention and Treatment of Breast Cancer |
title_short | Pros and Cons of Pharmacological Manipulation of cGMP-PDEs in the Prevention and Treatment of Breast Cancer |
title_sort | pros and cons of pharmacological manipulation of cgmp-pdes in the prevention and treatment of breast cancer |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8745278/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35008687 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010262 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT diioriopatrizia prosandconsofpharmacologicalmanipulationofcgmppdesinthepreventionandtreatmentofbreastcancer AT roncimaurizio prosandconsofpharmacologicalmanipulationofcgmppdesinthepreventionandtreatmentofbreastcancer AT giulianipatricia prosandconsofpharmacologicalmanipulationofcgmppdesinthepreventionandtreatmentofbreastcancer AT caciaglifrancesco prosandconsofpharmacologicalmanipulationofcgmppdesinthepreventionandtreatmentofbreastcancer AT ciccarellirenata prosandconsofpharmacologicalmanipulationofcgmppdesinthepreventionandtreatmentofbreastcancer AT carusovanni prosandconsofpharmacologicalmanipulationofcgmppdesinthepreventionandtreatmentofbreastcancer AT beggiatosarah prosandconsofpharmacologicalmanipulationofcgmppdesinthepreventionandtreatmentofbreastcancer AT zuccarinimariachiara prosandconsofpharmacologicalmanipulationofcgmppdesinthepreventionandtreatmentofbreastcancer |