Cargando…

Pros and Cons of Pharmacological Manipulation of cGMP-PDEs in the Prevention and Treatment of Breast Cancer

The cyclic nucleotides, cAMP and cGMP, are ubiquitous second messengers responsible for translating extracellular signals to intracellular biological responses in both normal and tumor cells. When these signals are aberrant or missing, cells may undergo neoplastic transformation or become resistant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Di Iorio, Patrizia, Ronci, Maurizio, Giuliani, Patricia, Caciagli, Francesco, Ciccarelli, Renata, Caruso, Vanni, Beggiato, Sarah, Zuccarini, Mariachiara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8745278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35008687
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010262
_version_ 1784630306609823744
author Di Iorio, Patrizia
Ronci, Maurizio
Giuliani, Patricia
Caciagli, Francesco
Ciccarelli, Renata
Caruso, Vanni
Beggiato, Sarah
Zuccarini, Mariachiara
author_facet Di Iorio, Patrizia
Ronci, Maurizio
Giuliani, Patricia
Caciagli, Francesco
Ciccarelli, Renata
Caruso, Vanni
Beggiato, Sarah
Zuccarini, Mariachiara
author_sort Di Iorio, Patrizia
collection PubMed
description The cyclic nucleotides, cAMP and cGMP, are ubiquitous second messengers responsible for translating extracellular signals to intracellular biological responses in both normal and tumor cells. When these signals are aberrant or missing, cells may undergo neoplastic transformation or become resistant to chemotherapy. cGMP-hydrolyzing phosphodiesterases (PDEs) are attracting tremendous interest as drug targets for many diseases, including cancer, where they regulate cell growth, apoptosis and sensitization to radio- and chemotherapy. In breast cancer, PDE5 inhibition is associated with increased intracellular cGMP levels, which is responsible for the phosphorylation of PKG and other downstream molecules involved in cell proliferation or apoptosis. In this review, we provide an overview of the most relevant studies regarding the controversial role of PDE inhibitors as off-label adjuvants in cancer therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8745278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87452782022-01-11 Pros and Cons of Pharmacological Manipulation of cGMP-PDEs in the Prevention and Treatment of Breast Cancer Di Iorio, Patrizia Ronci, Maurizio Giuliani, Patricia Caciagli, Francesco Ciccarelli, Renata Caruso, Vanni Beggiato, Sarah Zuccarini, Mariachiara Int J Mol Sci Review The cyclic nucleotides, cAMP and cGMP, are ubiquitous second messengers responsible for translating extracellular signals to intracellular biological responses in both normal and tumor cells. When these signals are aberrant or missing, cells may undergo neoplastic transformation or become resistant to chemotherapy. cGMP-hydrolyzing phosphodiesterases (PDEs) are attracting tremendous interest as drug targets for many diseases, including cancer, where they regulate cell growth, apoptosis and sensitization to radio- and chemotherapy. In breast cancer, PDE5 inhibition is associated with increased intracellular cGMP levels, which is responsible for the phosphorylation of PKG and other downstream molecules involved in cell proliferation or apoptosis. In this review, we provide an overview of the most relevant studies regarding the controversial role of PDE inhibitors as off-label adjuvants in cancer therapy. MDPI 2021-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8745278/ /pubmed/35008687 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010262 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Di Iorio, Patrizia
Ronci, Maurizio
Giuliani, Patricia
Caciagli, Francesco
Ciccarelli, Renata
Caruso, Vanni
Beggiato, Sarah
Zuccarini, Mariachiara
Pros and Cons of Pharmacological Manipulation of cGMP-PDEs in the Prevention and Treatment of Breast Cancer
title Pros and Cons of Pharmacological Manipulation of cGMP-PDEs in the Prevention and Treatment of Breast Cancer
title_full Pros and Cons of Pharmacological Manipulation of cGMP-PDEs in the Prevention and Treatment of Breast Cancer
title_fullStr Pros and Cons of Pharmacological Manipulation of cGMP-PDEs in the Prevention and Treatment of Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Pros and Cons of Pharmacological Manipulation of cGMP-PDEs in the Prevention and Treatment of Breast Cancer
title_short Pros and Cons of Pharmacological Manipulation of cGMP-PDEs in the Prevention and Treatment of Breast Cancer
title_sort pros and cons of pharmacological manipulation of cgmp-pdes in the prevention and treatment of breast cancer
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8745278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35008687
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010262
work_keys_str_mv AT diioriopatrizia prosandconsofpharmacologicalmanipulationofcgmppdesinthepreventionandtreatmentofbreastcancer
AT roncimaurizio prosandconsofpharmacologicalmanipulationofcgmppdesinthepreventionandtreatmentofbreastcancer
AT giulianipatricia prosandconsofpharmacologicalmanipulationofcgmppdesinthepreventionandtreatmentofbreastcancer
AT caciaglifrancesco prosandconsofpharmacologicalmanipulationofcgmppdesinthepreventionandtreatmentofbreastcancer
AT ciccarellirenata prosandconsofpharmacologicalmanipulationofcgmppdesinthepreventionandtreatmentofbreastcancer
AT carusovanni prosandconsofpharmacologicalmanipulationofcgmppdesinthepreventionandtreatmentofbreastcancer
AT beggiatosarah prosandconsofpharmacologicalmanipulationofcgmppdesinthepreventionandtreatmentofbreastcancer
AT zuccarinimariachiara prosandconsofpharmacologicalmanipulationofcgmppdesinthepreventionandtreatmentofbreastcancer