Cargando…
Benchmarking atlas-level data integration in single-cell genomics
Single-cell atlases often include samples that span locations, laboratories and conditions, leading to complex, nested batch effects in data. Thus, joint analysis of atlas datasets requires reliable data integration. To guide integration method choice, we benchmarked 68 method and preprocessing comb...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8748196/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34949812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41592-021-01336-8 |
_version_ | 1784630973863821312 |
---|---|
author | Luecken, Malte D. Büttner, M. Chaichoompu, K. Danese, A. Interlandi, M. Mueller, M. F. Strobl, D. C. Zappia, L. Dugas, M. Colomé-Tatché, M. Theis, Fabian J. |
author_facet | Luecken, Malte D. Büttner, M. Chaichoompu, K. Danese, A. Interlandi, M. Mueller, M. F. Strobl, D. C. Zappia, L. Dugas, M. Colomé-Tatché, M. Theis, Fabian J. |
author_sort | Luecken, Malte D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Single-cell atlases often include samples that span locations, laboratories and conditions, leading to complex, nested batch effects in data. Thus, joint analysis of atlas datasets requires reliable data integration. To guide integration method choice, we benchmarked 68 method and preprocessing combinations on 85 batches of gene expression, chromatin accessibility and simulation data from 23 publications, altogether representing >1.2 million cells distributed in 13 atlas-level integration tasks. We evaluated methods according to scalability, usability and their ability to remove batch effects while retaining biological variation using 14 evaluation metrics. We show that highly variable gene selection improves the performance of data integration methods, whereas scaling pushes methods to prioritize batch removal over conservation of biological variation. Overall, scANVI, Scanorama, scVI and scGen perform well, particularly on complex integration tasks, while single-cell ATAC-sequencing integration performance is strongly affected by choice of feature space. Our freely available Python module and benchmarking pipeline can identify optimal data integration methods for new data, benchmark new methods and improve method development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8748196 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87481962022-01-20 Benchmarking atlas-level data integration in single-cell genomics Luecken, Malte D. Büttner, M. Chaichoompu, K. Danese, A. Interlandi, M. Mueller, M. F. Strobl, D. C. Zappia, L. Dugas, M. Colomé-Tatché, M. Theis, Fabian J. Nat Methods Analysis Single-cell atlases often include samples that span locations, laboratories and conditions, leading to complex, nested batch effects in data. Thus, joint analysis of atlas datasets requires reliable data integration. To guide integration method choice, we benchmarked 68 method and preprocessing combinations on 85 batches of gene expression, chromatin accessibility and simulation data from 23 publications, altogether representing >1.2 million cells distributed in 13 atlas-level integration tasks. We evaluated methods according to scalability, usability and their ability to remove batch effects while retaining biological variation using 14 evaluation metrics. We show that highly variable gene selection improves the performance of data integration methods, whereas scaling pushes methods to prioritize batch removal over conservation of biological variation. Overall, scANVI, Scanorama, scVI and scGen perform well, particularly on complex integration tasks, while single-cell ATAC-sequencing integration performance is strongly affected by choice of feature space. Our freely available Python module and benchmarking pipeline can identify optimal data integration methods for new data, benchmark new methods and improve method development. Nature Publishing Group US 2021-12-23 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8748196/ /pubmed/34949812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41592-021-01336-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Analysis Luecken, Malte D. Büttner, M. Chaichoompu, K. Danese, A. Interlandi, M. Mueller, M. F. Strobl, D. C. Zappia, L. Dugas, M. Colomé-Tatché, M. Theis, Fabian J. Benchmarking atlas-level data integration in single-cell genomics |
title | Benchmarking atlas-level data integration in single-cell genomics |
title_full | Benchmarking atlas-level data integration in single-cell genomics |
title_fullStr | Benchmarking atlas-level data integration in single-cell genomics |
title_full_unstemmed | Benchmarking atlas-level data integration in single-cell genomics |
title_short | Benchmarking atlas-level data integration in single-cell genomics |
title_sort | benchmarking atlas-level data integration in single-cell genomics |
topic | Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8748196/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34949812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41592-021-01336-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lueckenmalted benchmarkingatlasleveldataintegrationinsinglecellgenomics AT buttnerm benchmarkingatlasleveldataintegrationinsinglecellgenomics AT chaichoompuk benchmarkingatlasleveldataintegrationinsinglecellgenomics AT danesea benchmarkingatlasleveldataintegrationinsinglecellgenomics AT interlandim benchmarkingatlasleveldataintegrationinsinglecellgenomics AT muellermf benchmarkingatlasleveldataintegrationinsinglecellgenomics AT strobldc benchmarkingatlasleveldataintegrationinsinglecellgenomics AT zappial benchmarkingatlasleveldataintegrationinsinglecellgenomics AT dugasm benchmarkingatlasleveldataintegrationinsinglecellgenomics AT colometatchem benchmarkingatlasleveldataintegrationinsinglecellgenomics AT theisfabianj benchmarkingatlasleveldataintegrationinsinglecellgenomics |