Cargando…

Higher Meat Intake Is Associated with Higher Inflammatory Markers, Mostly Due to Adiposity: Results from UK Biobank

BACKGROUND: High meat consumption might play a role in promoting low-grade systemic inflammation, but evidence is limited. OBJECTIVES: We examined cross-sectional associations of habitual meat consumption with serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and total white blood cell count (WBCC) in British adults....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papier, Keren, Hartman, Lilian, Tong, Tammy Y N, Key, Timothy J, Knuppel, Anika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8754571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34587250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxab314
_version_ 1784632299130716160
author Papier, Keren
Hartman, Lilian
Tong, Tammy Y N
Key, Timothy J
Knuppel, Anika
author_facet Papier, Keren
Hartman, Lilian
Tong, Tammy Y N
Key, Timothy J
Knuppel, Anika
author_sort Papier, Keren
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: High meat consumption might play a role in promoting low-grade systemic inflammation, but evidence is limited. OBJECTIVES: We examined cross-sectional associations of habitual meat consumption with serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and total white blood cell count (WBCC) in British adults. METHODS: We included 403,886 men and women (aged 38–73 y) participating in the UK Biobank who provided information on meat intake (via touchscreen questionnaire) and a nonfasting blood sample at recruitment (2006–2010). For a subset of participants (∼5%), an additional blood sample was collected (median 4.4 y later). We used multivariable linear regression models to estimate associations of meat intake (total meat, unprocessed red meat, processed meat, and poultry) with logCRP and logWBCC. RESULTS: The difference in the serum CRP (mg/L) for each 50-g/d higher intake for total meat was 11.6% (95% CI: 11.1, 12.0%), for processed meat was 38.3% (95% CI: 36.0, 40.7%), for unprocessed red meat was 14.4% (95% CI: 13.6, 15.1%), and for poultry was 12.8% (95% CI: 12.0, 13.5%). The difference in the WBCC (×10(–9)L) for each 50 g/d higher intake of total meat was 1.5% (95% CI: 1.4, 1.6%), for processed meat was 6.5% (95% CI: 6.1, 6.9%), for unprocessed red meat was 1.6% (95% CI: 1.4, 1.7%), and for poultry was 1.6% (95% CI: 1.4, 1.7%). All associations were attenuated after adjustment for adiposity; by 67% with BMI (in kg/m(2)) and by 58% with waist circumference for total meat and CRP, and by 53% and 47%, respectively, for WBCC, although associations remained statistically significant. Findings of sensitivity analyses in 15,420 participants were similar prospectively, except there were no associations between unprocessed red meat and WBCC. CONCLUSIONS: Higher meat consumption, particularly of processed meat, was positively associated with inflammatory markers in these British adults; however, the magnitudes of associations are small and predominantly due to higher adiposity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8754571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87545712022-01-14 Higher Meat Intake Is Associated with Higher Inflammatory Markers, Mostly Due to Adiposity: Results from UK Biobank Papier, Keren Hartman, Lilian Tong, Tammy Y N Key, Timothy J Knuppel, Anika J Nutr Nutritional Epidemiology BACKGROUND: High meat consumption might play a role in promoting low-grade systemic inflammation, but evidence is limited. OBJECTIVES: We examined cross-sectional associations of habitual meat consumption with serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and total white blood cell count (WBCC) in British adults. METHODS: We included 403,886 men and women (aged 38–73 y) participating in the UK Biobank who provided information on meat intake (via touchscreen questionnaire) and a nonfasting blood sample at recruitment (2006–2010). For a subset of participants (∼5%), an additional blood sample was collected (median 4.4 y later). We used multivariable linear regression models to estimate associations of meat intake (total meat, unprocessed red meat, processed meat, and poultry) with logCRP and logWBCC. RESULTS: The difference in the serum CRP (mg/L) for each 50-g/d higher intake for total meat was 11.6% (95% CI: 11.1, 12.0%), for processed meat was 38.3% (95% CI: 36.0, 40.7%), for unprocessed red meat was 14.4% (95% CI: 13.6, 15.1%), and for poultry was 12.8% (95% CI: 12.0, 13.5%). The difference in the WBCC (×10(–9)L) for each 50 g/d higher intake of total meat was 1.5% (95% CI: 1.4, 1.6%), for processed meat was 6.5% (95% CI: 6.1, 6.9%), for unprocessed red meat was 1.6% (95% CI: 1.4, 1.7%), and for poultry was 1.6% (95% CI: 1.4, 1.7%). All associations were attenuated after adjustment for adiposity; by 67% with BMI (in kg/m(2)) and by 58% with waist circumference for total meat and CRP, and by 53% and 47%, respectively, for WBCC, although associations remained statistically significant. Findings of sensitivity analyses in 15,420 participants were similar prospectively, except there were no associations between unprocessed red meat and WBCC. CONCLUSIONS: Higher meat consumption, particularly of processed meat, was positively associated with inflammatory markers in these British adults; however, the magnitudes of associations are small and predominantly due to higher adiposity. Oxford University Press 2021-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8754571/ /pubmed/34587250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxab314 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Nutritional Epidemiology
Papier, Keren
Hartman, Lilian
Tong, Tammy Y N
Key, Timothy J
Knuppel, Anika
Higher Meat Intake Is Associated with Higher Inflammatory Markers, Mostly Due to Adiposity: Results from UK Biobank
title Higher Meat Intake Is Associated with Higher Inflammatory Markers, Mostly Due to Adiposity: Results from UK Biobank
title_full Higher Meat Intake Is Associated with Higher Inflammatory Markers, Mostly Due to Adiposity: Results from UK Biobank
title_fullStr Higher Meat Intake Is Associated with Higher Inflammatory Markers, Mostly Due to Adiposity: Results from UK Biobank
title_full_unstemmed Higher Meat Intake Is Associated with Higher Inflammatory Markers, Mostly Due to Adiposity: Results from UK Biobank
title_short Higher Meat Intake Is Associated with Higher Inflammatory Markers, Mostly Due to Adiposity: Results from UK Biobank
title_sort higher meat intake is associated with higher inflammatory markers, mostly due to adiposity: results from uk biobank
topic Nutritional Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8754571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34587250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxab314
work_keys_str_mv AT papierkeren highermeatintakeisassociatedwithhigherinflammatorymarkersmostlyduetoadiposityresultsfromukbiobank
AT hartmanlilian highermeatintakeisassociatedwithhigherinflammatorymarkersmostlyduetoadiposityresultsfromukbiobank
AT tongtammyyn highermeatintakeisassociatedwithhigherinflammatorymarkersmostlyduetoadiposityresultsfromukbiobank
AT keytimothyj highermeatintakeisassociatedwithhigherinflammatorymarkersmostlyduetoadiposityresultsfromukbiobank
AT knuppelanika highermeatintakeisassociatedwithhigherinflammatorymarkersmostlyduetoadiposityresultsfromukbiobank