Cargando…

Expression of GM content in mass fraction from digital PCR data

Nowadays the quantification of the content of genetically modified (GM) constituents in food or feed products is performed by using either quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) or digital PCR (dPCR). The latter is increasingly used. Therefore, experimental protocols for the quantification of 52 GM event...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Corbisier, Philippe, Buttinger, Gerhard, Savini, Cristian, Sacco, Maria Grazia, Gatto, Francesco, Emons, Hendrik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8756621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35241875
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108626
_version_ 1784632597421228032
author Corbisier, Philippe
Buttinger, Gerhard
Savini, Cristian
Sacco, Maria Grazia
Gatto, Francesco
Emons, Hendrik
author_facet Corbisier, Philippe
Buttinger, Gerhard
Savini, Cristian
Sacco, Maria Grazia
Gatto, Francesco
Emons, Hendrik
author_sort Corbisier, Philippe
collection PubMed
description Nowadays the quantification of the content of genetically modified (GM) constituents in food or feed products is performed by using either quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) or digital PCR (dPCR). The latter is increasingly used. Therefore, experimental protocols for the quantification of 52 GM events authorised in the EU have been converted into a digital format and minimum performance characteristics for dPCR methods are detailed. Because of the need to harmonise the transformation of PCR results between two different measurement scales, 50 conversion factors for Certified Reference Materials (CF(CRM)) have been experimentally determined by three and sometimes four independent expert laboratories. The uncertainty of each CF(CRM) has been estimated to express dPCR results in mass fraction with a consistent uncertainty contribution. In 38 out of 58 cases, the validated qPCR methods (for 52 event-specific and 6 taxon-specific measurements) could easily be transferred into dPCR methods by using the same oligo sequences, final oligo concentration or annealing temperatures for the dPCR procedure. Laboratories have nevertheless used different strategies to improve the resolution or to reduce the so-called rain in their dPCR outcome. Those modifications were needed for PCR procedures that could not be converted without changes into a digital format. Therefore, exclusion/quality criteria such as the maximum rate of partitions with intermediate fluorescence “rain”, the minimum resolution and repeatability are suggested for dPCR methods. The CF(CRM) determined in this study were generally in agreement with the declared zygosity of the GM parental donor for hemizygous maize events. In a limited number of GM events the CF(CRM) values were significantly different when measured with different maize-specific (ZmAdh1 or hmgA) genes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8756621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87566212022-03-01 Expression of GM content in mass fraction from digital PCR data Corbisier, Philippe Buttinger, Gerhard Savini, Cristian Sacco, Maria Grazia Gatto, Francesco Emons, Hendrik Food Control Article Nowadays the quantification of the content of genetically modified (GM) constituents in food or feed products is performed by using either quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) or digital PCR (dPCR). The latter is increasingly used. Therefore, experimental protocols for the quantification of 52 GM events authorised in the EU have been converted into a digital format and minimum performance characteristics for dPCR methods are detailed. Because of the need to harmonise the transformation of PCR results between two different measurement scales, 50 conversion factors for Certified Reference Materials (CF(CRM)) have been experimentally determined by three and sometimes four independent expert laboratories. The uncertainty of each CF(CRM) has been estimated to express dPCR results in mass fraction with a consistent uncertainty contribution. In 38 out of 58 cases, the validated qPCR methods (for 52 event-specific and 6 taxon-specific measurements) could easily be transferred into dPCR methods by using the same oligo sequences, final oligo concentration or annealing temperatures for the dPCR procedure. Laboratories have nevertheless used different strategies to improve the resolution or to reduce the so-called rain in their dPCR outcome. Those modifications were needed for PCR procedures that could not be converted without changes into a digital format. Therefore, exclusion/quality criteria such as the maximum rate of partitions with intermediate fluorescence “rain”, the minimum resolution and repeatability are suggested for dPCR methods. The CF(CRM) determined in this study were generally in agreement with the declared zygosity of the GM parental donor for hemizygous maize events. In a limited number of GM events the CF(CRM) values were significantly different when measured with different maize-specific (ZmAdh1 or hmgA) genes. Elsevier Science 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8756621/ /pubmed/35241875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108626 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Corbisier, Philippe
Buttinger, Gerhard
Savini, Cristian
Sacco, Maria Grazia
Gatto, Francesco
Emons, Hendrik
Expression of GM content in mass fraction from digital PCR data
title Expression of GM content in mass fraction from digital PCR data
title_full Expression of GM content in mass fraction from digital PCR data
title_fullStr Expression of GM content in mass fraction from digital PCR data
title_full_unstemmed Expression of GM content in mass fraction from digital PCR data
title_short Expression of GM content in mass fraction from digital PCR data
title_sort expression of gm content in mass fraction from digital pcr data
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8756621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35241875
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108626
work_keys_str_mv AT corbisierphilippe expressionofgmcontentinmassfractionfromdigitalpcrdata
AT buttingergerhard expressionofgmcontentinmassfractionfromdigitalpcrdata
AT savinicristian expressionofgmcontentinmassfractionfromdigitalpcrdata
AT saccomariagrazia expressionofgmcontentinmassfractionfromdigitalpcrdata
AT gattofrancesco expressionofgmcontentinmassfractionfromdigitalpcrdata
AT emonshendrik expressionofgmcontentinmassfractionfromdigitalpcrdata