Cargando…

Use of neuroimaging to measure neurocognitive engagement in health professions education: a scoping review

PURPOSE: To map the current literature on functional neuroimaging use in medical education research as a novel measurement modality for neurocognitive engagement, learning, and expertise development. METHOD: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, ERIC, and Web of Science, and hand-searched reference...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toy, Serkan, Huh, Dana D, Materi, Joshua, Nanavati, Julie, Schwengel, Deborah A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8757598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35012424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.2016357
_version_ 1784632710823673856
author Toy, Serkan
Huh, Dana D
Materi, Joshua
Nanavati, Julie
Schwengel, Deborah A.
author_facet Toy, Serkan
Huh, Dana D
Materi, Joshua
Nanavati, Julie
Schwengel, Deborah A.
author_sort Toy, Serkan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To map the current literature on functional neuroimaging use in medical education research as a novel measurement modality for neurocognitive engagement, learning, and expertise development. METHOD: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, ERIC, and Web of Science, and hand-searched reference lists of relevant articles on April 4, 2019, and updated the search on July 7, 2020. Two authors screened the abstracts and then full-text articles for eligibility based on inclusion criteria. The data were then charted, synthesized, and analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: Sixty-seven articles published between 2007 and 2020 were included in this scoping review. These studies used three main neuroimaging modalities: functional magnetic resonance imaging, functional near-infrared spectroscopy, and electroencephalography. Most of the publications (90%, n = 60) were from the last 10 years (2011–2020). Although these studies were conducted in 16 countries, 68.7% (n = 46) were from three countries: the USA (n = 21), UK (n = 15), and Canada (n = 10). These studies were mainly non-experimental (74.6%, n = 50). Most used neuroimaging techniques to examine psychomotor skill development (57%, n = 38), but several investigated neurocognitive correlates of clinical reasoning skills (22%, n = 15). CONCLUSION: This scoping review maps the available literature on functional neuroimaging use in medical education. Despite the heterogeneity in research questions, study designs, and outcome measures, we identified a few common themes. Included studies are encouraging of the potential for neuroimaging to complement commonly used measures in education research and may help validate/challenge established theoretical assumptions and provide insight into training methods. This review highlighted several areas for further research. The use of these emerging technologies appears ripe for developing precision education, establishing viable study protocols for realistic operational settings, examining team dynamics, and exploring applications for real-time monitoring/intervention during critical clinical tasks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8757598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87575982022-01-14 Use of neuroimaging to measure neurocognitive engagement in health professions education: a scoping review Toy, Serkan Huh, Dana D Materi, Joshua Nanavati, Julie Schwengel, Deborah A. Med Educ Online Review Article PURPOSE: To map the current literature on functional neuroimaging use in medical education research as a novel measurement modality for neurocognitive engagement, learning, and expertise development. METHOD: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, ERIC, and Web of Science, and hand-searched reference lists of relevant articles on April 4, 2019, and updated the search on July 7, 2020. Two authors screened the abstracts and then full-text articles for eligibility based on inclusion criteria. The data were then charted, synthesized, and analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: Sixty-seven articles published between 2007 and 2020 were included in this scoping review. These studies used three main neuroimaging modalities: functional magnetic resonance imaging, functional near-infrared spectroscopy, and electroencephalography. Most of the publications (90%, n = 60) were from the last 10 years (2011–2020). Although these studies were conducted in 16 countries, 68.7% (n = 46) were from three countries: the USA (n = 21), UK (n = 15), and Canada (n = 10). These studies were mainly non-experimental (74.6%, n = 50). Most used neuroimaging techniques to examine psychomotor skill development (57%, n = 38), but several investigated neurocognitive correlates of clinical reasoning skills (22%, n = 15). CONCLUSION: This scoping review maps the available literature on functional neuroimaging use in medical education. Despite the heterogeneity in research questions, study designs, and outcome measures, we identified a few common themes. Included studies are encouraging of the potential for neuroimaging to complement commonly used measures in education research and may help validate/challenge established theoretical assumptions and provide insight into training methods. This review highlighted several areas for further research. The use of these emerging technologies appears ripe for developing precision education, establishing viable study protocols for realistic operational settings, examining team dynamics, and exploring applications for real-time monitoring/intervention during critical clinical tasks. Taylor & Francis 2022-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8757598/ /pubmed/35012424 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.2016357 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Toy, Serkan
Huh, Dana D
Materi, Joshua
Nanavati, Julie
Schwengel, Deborah A.
Use of neuroimaging to measure neurocognitive engagement in health professions education: a scoping review
title Use of neuroimaging to measure neurocognitive engagement in health professions education: a scoping review
title_full Use of neuroimaging to measure neurocognitive engagement in health professions education: a scoping review
title_fullStr Use of neuroimaging to measure neurocognitive engagement in health professions education: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Use of neuroimaging to measure neurocognitive engagement in health professions education: a scoping review
title_short Use of neuroimaging to measure neurocognitive engagement in health professions education: a scoping review
title_sort use of neuroimaging to measure neurocognitive engagement in health professions education: a scoping review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8757598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35012424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.2016357
work_keys_str_mv AT toyserkan useofneuroimagingtomeasureneurocognitiveengagementinhealthprofessionseducationascopingreview
AT huhdanad useofneuroimagingtomeasureneurocognitiveengagementinhealthprofessionseducationascopingreview
AT materijoshua useofneuroimagingtomeasureneurocognitiveengagementinhealthprofessionseducationascopingreview
AT nanavatijulie useofneuroimagingtomeasureneurocognitiveengagementinhealthprofessionseducationascopingreview
AT schwengeldeboraha useofneuroimagingtomeasureneurocognitiveengagementinhealthprofessionseducationascopingreview