Cargando…

Confounds of using the unc-58 selection marker highlights the importance of genotyping co-CRISPR genes

Multiple advances have been made to increase the efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 editing using the model genetic organism Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans). Here we report on the use of co-CRISPR ‘marker’ genes: worms in which co-CRISPR events have occurred have overt, visible phenotypes which facilitat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rawsthorne-Manning, Helena, Calahorro, Fernando, G. Izquierdo, Patricia, Tardy, Philippe, Boulin, Thomas, Holden-Dye, Lindy, O’Connor, Vincent, Dillon, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8765651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35041685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253351
_version_ 1784634361899909120
author Rawsthorne-Manning, Helena
Calahorro, Fernando
G. Izquierdo, Patricia
Tardy, Philippe
Boulin, Thomas
Holden-Dye, Lindy
O’Connor, Vincent
Dillon, James
author_facet Rawsthorne-Manning, Helena
Calahorro, Fernando
G. Izquierdo, Patricia
Tardy, Philippe
Boulin, Thomas
Holden-Dye, Lindy
O’Connor, Vincent
Dillon, James
author_sort Rawsthorne-Manning, Helena
collection PubMed
description Multiple advances have been made to increase the efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 editing using the model genetic organism Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans). Here we report on the use of co-CRISPR ‘marker’ genes: worms in which co-CRISPR events have occurred have overt, visible phenotypes which facilitates the selection of worms that harbour CRISPR events in the target gene. Mutation in the co-CRISPR gene is then removed by outcrossing to wild type but this can be challenging if the CRISPR and co-CRISPR gene are hard to segregate. However, segregating away the co-CRISPR modified gene can be less challenging if the worms selected appear wild type and are selected from a jackpot brood. These are broods in which a high proportion of the progeny of a single injected worm display the co-CRISPR phenotype suggesting high CRISPR efficiency. This can deliver worms that harbour the desired mutation in the target gene locus without the co-CRISPR mutation. We have successfully generated a discrete mutation in the C. elegans nlg-1 gene using this method. However, in the process of sequencing to authenticate editing in the nlg-1 gene we discovered genomic rearrangements that arise at the co-CRISPR gene unc-58 that by visual observation were phenotypically silent but nonetheless resulted in a significant reduction in motility scored by thrashing behaviour. This highlights that careful consideration of the hidden consequences of co-CRISPR mediated genetic changes should be taken before downstream analysis of gene function. Given this, we suggest sequencing of co-CRISPR genes following CRISPR procedures that utilise phenotypic selection as part of the pipeline.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8765651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87656512022-01-19 Confounds of using the unc-58 selection marker highlights the importance of genotyping co-CRISPR genes Rawsthorne-Manning, Helena Calahorro, Fernando G. Izquierdo, Patricia Tardy, Philippe Boulin, Thomas Holden-Dye, Lindy O’Connor, Vincent Dillon, James PLoS One Research Article Multiple advances have been made to increase the efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 editing using the model genetic organism Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans). Here we report on the use of co-CRISPR ‘marker’ genes: worms in which co-CRISPR events have occurred have overt, visible phenotypes which facilitates the selection of worms that harbour CRISPR events in the target gene. Mutation in the co-CRISPR gene is then removed by outcrossing to wild type but this can be challenging if the CRISPR and co-CRISPR gene are hard to segregate. However, segregating away the co-CRISPR modified gene can be less challenging if the worms selected appear wild type and are selected from a jackpot brood. These are broods in which a high proportion of the progeny of a single injected worm display the co-CRISPR phenotype suggesting high CRISPR efficiency. This can deliver worms that harbour the desired mutation in the target gene locus without the co-CRISPR mutation. We have successfully generated a discrete mutation in the C. elegans nlg-1 gene using this method. However, in the process of sequencing to authenticate editing in the nlg-1 gene we discovered genomic rearrangements that arise at the co-CRISPR gene unc-58 that by visual observation were phenotypically silent but nonetheless resulted in a significant reduction in motility scored by thrashing behaviour. This highlights that careful consideration of the hidden consequences of co-CRISPR mediated genetic changes should be taken before downstream analysis of gene function. Given this, we suggest sequencing of co-CRISPR genes following CRISPR procedures that utilise phenotypic selection as part of the pipeline. Public Library of Science 2022-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8765651/ /pubmed/35041685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253351 Text en © 2022 Rawsthorne-Manning et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rawsthorne-Manning, Helena
Calahorro, Fernando
G. Izquierdo, Patricia
Tardy, Philippe
Boulin, Thomas
Holden-Dye, Lindy
O’Connor, Vincent
Dillon, James
Confounds of using the unc-58 selection marker highlights the importance of genotyping co-CRISPR genes
title Confounds of using the unc-58 selection marker highlights the importance of genotyping co-CRISPR genes
title_full Confounds of using the unc-58 selection marker highlights the importance of genotyping co-CRISPR genes
title_fullStr Confounds of using the unc-58 selection marker highlights the importance of genotyping co-CRISPR genes
title_full_unstemmed Confounds of using the unc-58 selection marker highlights the importance of genotyping co-CRISPR genes
title_short Confounds of using the unc-58 selection marker highlights the importance of genotyping co-CRISPR genes
title_sort confounds of using the unc-58 selection marker highlights the importance of genotyping co-crispr genes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8765651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35041685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253351
work_keys_str_mv AT rawsthornemanninghelena confoundsofusingtheunc58selectionmarkerhighlightstheimportanceofgenotypingcocrisprgenes
AT calahorrofernando confoundsofusingtheunc58selectionmarkerhighlightstheimportanceofgenotypingcocrisprgenes
AT gizquierdopatricia confoundsofusingtheunc58selectionmarkerhighlightstheimportanceofgenotypingcocrisprgenes
AT tardyphilippe confoundsofusingtheunc58selectionmarkerhighlightstheimportanceofgenotypingcocrisprgenes
AT boulinthomas confoundsofusingtheunc58selectionmarkerhighlightstheimportanceofgenotypingcocrisprgenes
AT holdendyelindy confoundsofusingtheunc58selectionmarkerhighlightstheimportanceofgenotypingcocrisprgenes
AT oconnorvincent confoundsofusingtheunc58selectionmarkerhighlightstheimportanceofgenotypingcocrisprgenes
AT dillonjames confoundsofusingtheunc58selectionmarkerhighlightstheimportanceofgenotypingcocrisprgenes