Cargando…
Confounds of using the unc-58 selection marker highlights the importance of genotyping co-CRISPR genes
Multiple advances have been made to increase the efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 editing using the model genetic organism Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans). Here we report on the use of co-CRISPR ‘marker’ genes: worms in which co-CRISPR events have occurred have overt, visible phenotypes which facilitat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8765651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35041685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253351 |
_version_ | 1784634361899909120 |
---|---|
author | Rawsthorne-Manning, Helena Calahorro, Fernando G. Izquierdo, Patricia Tardy, Philippe Boulin, Thomas Holden-Dye, Lindy O’Connor, Vincent Dillon, James |
author_facet | Rawsthorne-Manning, Helena Calahorro, Fernando G. Izquierdo, Patricia Tardy, Philippe Boulin, Thomas Holden-Dye, Lindy O’Connor, Vincent Dillon, James |
author_sort | Rawsthorne-Manning, Helena |
collection | PubMed |
description | Multiple advances have been made to increase the efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 editing using the model genetic organism Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans). Here we report on the use of co-CRISPR ‘marker’ genes: worms in which co-CRISPR events have occurred have overt, visible phenotypes which facilitates the selection of worms that harbour CRISPR events in the target gene. Mutation in the co-CRISPR gene is then removed by outcrossing to wild type but this can be challenging if the CRISPR and co-CRISPR gene are hard to segregate. However, segregating away the co-CRISPR modified gene can be less challenging if the worms selected appear wild type and are selected from a jackpot brood. These are broods in which a high proportion of the progeny of a single injected worm display the co-CRISPR phenotype suggesting high CRISPR efficiency. This can deliver worms that harbour the desired mutation in the target gene locus without the co-CRISPR mutation. We have successfully generated a discrete mutation in the C. elegans nlg-1 gene using this method. However, in the process of sequencing to authenticate editing in the nlg-1 gene we discovered genomic rearrangements that arise at the co-CRISPR gene unc-58 that by visual observation were phenotypically silent but nonetheless resulted in a significant reduction in motility scored by thrashing behaviour. This highlights that careful consideration of the hidden consequences of co-CRISPR mediated genetic changes should be taken before downstream analysis of gene function. Given this, we suggest sequencing of co-CRISPR genes following CRISPR procedures that utilise phenotypic selection as part of the pipeline. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8765651 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87656512022-01-19 Confounds of using the unc-58 selection marker highlights the importance of genotyping co-CRISPR genes Rawsthorne-Manning, Helena Calahorro, Fernando G. Izquierdo, Patricia Tardy, Philippe Boulin, Thomas Holden-Dye, Lindy O’Connor, Vincent Dillon, James PLoS One Research Article Multiple advances have been made to increase the efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 editing using the model genetic organism Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans). Here we report on the use of co-CRISPR ‘marker’ genes: worms in which co-CRISPR events have occurred have overt, visible phenotypes which facilitates the selection of worms that harbour CRISPR events in the target gene. Mutation in the co-CRISPR gene is then removed by outcrossing to wild type but this can be challenging if the CRISPR and co-CRISPR gene are hard to segregate. However, segregating away the co-CRISPR modified gene can be less challenging if the worms selected appear wild type and are selected from a jackpot brood. These are broods in which a high proportion of the progeny of a single injected worm display the co-CRISPR phenotype suggesting high CRISPR efficiency. This can deliver worms that harbour the desired mutation in the target gene locus without the co-CRISPR mutation. We have successfully generated a discrete mutation in the C. elegans nlg-1 gene using this method. However, in the process of sequencing to authenticate editing in the nlg-1 gene we discovered genomic rearrangements that arise at the co-CRISPR gene unc-58 that by visual observation were phenotypically silent but nonetheless resulted in a significant reduction in motility scored by thrashing behaviour. This highlights that careful consideration of the hidden consequences of co-CRISPR mediated genetic changes should be taken before downstream analysis of gene function. Given this, we suggest sequencing of co-CRISPR genes following CRISPR procedures that utilise phenotypic selection as part of the pipeline. Public Library of Science 2022-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8765651/ /pubmed/35041685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253351 Text en © 2022 Rawsthorne-Manning et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rawsthorne-Manning, Helena Calahorro, Fernando G. Izquierdo, Patricia Tardy, Philippe Boulin, Thomas Holden-Dye, Lindy O’Connor, Vincent Dillon, James Confounds of using the unc-58 selection marker highlights the importance of genotyping co-CRISPR genes |
title | Confounds of using the unc-58 selection marker highlights the importance of genotyping co-CRISPR genes |
title_full | Confounds of using the unc-58 selection marker highlights the importance of genotyping co-CRISPR genes |
title_fullStr | Confounds of using the unc-58 selection marker highlights the importance of genotyping co-CRISPR genes |
title_full_unstemmed | Confounds of using the unc-58 selection marker highlights the importance of genotyping co-CRISPR genes |
title_short | Confounds of using the unc-58 selection marker highlights the importance of genotyping co-CRISPR genes |
title_sort | confounds of using the unc-58 selection marker highlights the importance of genotyping co-crispr genes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8765651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35041685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253351 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rawsthornemanninghelena confoundsofusingtheunc58selectionmarkerhighlightstheimportanceofgenotypingcocrisprgenes AT calahorrofernando confoundsofusingtheunc58selectionmarkerhighlightstheimportanceofgenotypingcocrisprgenes AT gizquierdopatricia confoundsofusingtheunc58selectionmarkerhighlightstheimportanceofgenotypingcocrisprgenes AT tardyphilippe confoundsofusingtheunc58selectionmarkerhighlightstheimportanceofgenotypingcocrisprgenes AT boulinthomas confoundsofusingtheunc58selectionmarkerhighlightstheimportanceofgenotypingcocrisprgenes AT holdendyelindy confoundsofusingtheunc58selectionmarkerhighlightstheimportanceofgenotypingcocrisprgenes AT oconnorvincent confoundsofusingtheunc58selectionmarkerhighlightstheimportanceofgenotypingcocrisprgenes AT dillonjames confoundsofusingtheunc58selectionmarkerhighlightstheimportanceofgenotypingcocrisprgenes |