Cargando…

Barriers and facilitators to program directors’ use of the medical education literature: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: It is unclear how often frontline clinical teachers are using this literature and its evidence base in teaching and assessment. Our study purpose was to examine postgraduate program director perspectives on the utilization and integration of evidence-based medical education literature in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doja, Asif, Lavin Venegas, Carolina, Cowley, Lindsay, Wiesenfeld, Lorne, Writer, Hilary, Clarkin, Chantalle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8772128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35045845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03104-4
_version_ 1784635777309736960
author Doja, Asif
Lavin Venegas, Carolina
Cowley, Lindsay
Wiesenfeld, Lorne
Writer, Hilary
Clarkin, Chantalle
author_facet Doja, Asif
Lavin Venegas, Carolina
Cowley, Lindsay
Wiesenfeld, Lorne
Writer, Hilary
Clarkin, Chantalle
author_sort Doja, Asif
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is unclear how often frontline clinical teachers are using this literature and its evidence base in teaching and assessment. Our study purpose was to examine postgraduate program director perspectives on the utilization and integration of evidence-based medical education literature in their teaching and assessment practices. METHODS: The authors conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with a convenience sample of current and former program directors from across Canada. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed inductively to distil pertinent themes. RESULTS: In 2017, 11 former and current program directors participated in interviews. Major themes uncovered included the desire for time-efficient and easily adaptable teaching and assessment tools. Participants reported insufficient time to examine the medical education literature, and preferred that it be ‘synthesized for them’. (i.e., Best evidence guidelines). Participants recognised continuing professional development and peer to peer sharing as useful means of education about evidence-based tools. Barriers to the integration of the literature in practice included inadequate time, lack of financial compensation for teaching and assessment, and the perception that teaching and assessment of trainees was not valued in academic promotion. DISCUSSION: Faculty development offices should consider the time constraints of clinical teachers when planning programming on teaching and assessment. To enhance uptake, medical education publications need to consider approaches that best meet the needs of a targeted audiences, including frontline clinical teachers. This may involve novel methods and formats that render evidence and findings from their studies more easily ‘digestible’ by clinical teachers to narrow the knowledge to practice gap. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03104-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8772128
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87721282022-01-20 Barriers and facilitators to program directors’ use of the medical education literature: a qualitative study Doja, Asif Lavin Venegas, Carolina Cowley, Lindsay Wiesenfeld, Lorne Writer, Hilary Clarkin, Chantalle BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: It is unclear how often frontline clinical teachers are using this literature and its evidence base in teaching and assessment. Our study purpose was to examine postgraduate program director perspectives on the utilization and integration of evidence-based medical education literature in their teaching and assessment practices. METHODS: The authors conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with a convenience sample of current and former program directors from across Canada. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed inductively to distil pertinent themes. RESULTS: In 2017, 11 former and current program directors participated in interviews. Major themes uncovered included the desire for time-efficient and easily adaptable teaching and assessment tools. Participants reported insufficient time to examine the medical education literature, and preferred that it be ‘synthesized for them’. (i.e., Best evidence guidelines). Participants recognised continuing professional development and peer to peer sharing as useful means of education about evidence-based tools. Barriers to the integration of the literature in practice included inadequate time, lack of financial compensation for teaching and assessment, and the perception that teaching and assessment of trainees was not valued in academic promotion. DISCUSSION: Faculty development offices should consider the time constraints of clinical teachers when planning programming on teaching and assessment. To enhance uptake, medical education publications need to consider approaches that best meet the needs of a targeted audiences, including frontline clinical teachers. This may involve novel methods and formats that render evidence and findings from their studies more easily ‘digestible’ by clinical teachers to narrow the knowledge to practice gap. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03104-4. BioMed Central 2022-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8772128/ /pubmed/35045845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03104-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Doja, Asif
Lavin Venegas, Carolina
Cowley, Lindsay
Wiesenfeld, Lorne
Writer, Hilary
Clarkin, Chantalle
Barriers and facilitators to program directors’ use of the medical education literature: a qualitative study
title Barriers and facilitators to program directors’ use of the medical education literature: a qualitative study
title_full Barriers and facilitators to program directors’ use of the medical education literature: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Barriers and facilitators to program directors’ use of the medical education literature: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Barriers and facilitators to program directors’ use of the medical education literature: a qualitative study
title_short Barriers and facilitators to program directors’ use of the medical education literature: a qualitative study
title_sort barriers and facilitators to program directors’ use of the medical education literature: a qualitative study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8772128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35045845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03104-4
work_keys_str_mv AT dojaasif barriersandfacilitatorstoprogramdirectorsuseofthemedicaleducationliteratureaqualitativestudy
AT lavinvenegascarolina barriersandfacilitatorstoprogramdirectorsuseofthemedicaleducationliteratureaqualitativestudy
AT cowleylindsay barriersandfacilitatorstoprogramdirectorsuseofthemedicaleducationliteratureaqualitativestudy
AT wiesenfeldlorne barriersandfacilitatorstoprogramdirectorsuseofthemedicaleducationliteratureaqualitativestudy
AT writerhilary barriersandfacilitatorstoprogramdirectorsuseofthemedicaleducationliteratureaqualitativestudy
AT clarkinchantalle barriersandfacilitatorstoprogramdirectorsuseofthemedicaleducationliteratureaqualitativestudy