Cargando…
Barriers and facilitators to program directors’ use of the medical education literature: a qualitative study
BACKGROUND: It is unclear how often frontline clinical teachers are using this literature and its evidence base in teaching and assessment. Our study purpose was to examine postgraduate program director perspectives on the utilization and integration of evidence-based medical education literature in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8772128/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35045845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03104-4 |
_version_ | 1784635777309736960 |
---|---|
author | Doja, Asif Lavin Venegas, Carolina Cowley, Lindsay Wiesenfeld, Lorne Writer, Hilary Clarkin, Chantalle |
author_facet | Doja, Asif Lavin Venegas, Carolina Cowley, Lindsay Wiesenfeld, Lorne Writer, Hilary Clarkin, Chantalle |
author_sort | Doja, Asif |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: It is unclear how often frontline clinical teachers are using this literature and its evidence base in teaching and assessment. Our study purpose was to examine postgraduate program director perspectives on the utilization and integration of evidence-based medical education literature in their teaching and assessment practices. METHODS: The authors conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with a convenience sample of current and former program directors from across Canada. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed inductively to distil pertinent themes. RESULTS: In 2017, 11 former and current program directors participated in interviews. Major themes uncovered included the desire for time-efficient and easily adaptable teaching and assessment tools. Participants reported insufficient time to examine the medical education literature, and preferred that it be ‘synthesized for them’. (i.e., Best evidence guidelines). Participants recognised continuing professional development and peer to peer sharing as useful means of education about evidence-based tools. Barriers to the integration of the literature in practice included inadequate time, lack of financial compensation for teaching and assessment, and the perception that teaching and assessment of trainees was not valued in academic promotion. DISCUSSION: Faculty development offices should consider the time constraints of clinical teachers when planning programming on teaching and assessment. To enhance uptake, medical education publications need to consider approaches that best meet the needs of a targeted audiences, including frontline clinical teachers. This may involve novel methods and formats that render evidence and findings from their studies more easily ‘digestible’ by clinical teachers to narrow the knowledge to practice gap. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03104-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8772128 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87721282022-01-20 Barriers and facilitators to program directors’ use of the medical education literature: a qualitative study Doja, Asif Lavin Venegas, Carolina Cowley, Lindsay Wiesenfeld, Lorne Writer, Hilary Clarkin, Chantalle BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: It is unclear how often frontline clinical teachers are using this literature and its evidence base in teaching and assessment. Our study purpose was to examine postgraduate program director perspectives on the utilization and integration of evidence-based medical education literature in their teaching and assessment practices. METHODS: The authors conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with a convenience sample of current and former program directors from across Canada. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed inductively to distil pertinent themes. RESULTS: In 2017, 11 former and current program directors participated in interviews. Major themes uncovered included the desire for time-efficient and easily adaptable teaching and assessment tools. Participants reported insufficient time to examine the medical education literature, and preferred that it be ‘synthesized for them’. (i.e., Best evidence guidelines). Participants recognised continuing professional development and peer to peer sharing as useful means of education about evidence-based tools. Barriers to the integration of the literature in practice included inadequate time, lack of financial compensation for teaching and assessment, and the perception that teaching and assessment of trainees was not valued in academic promotion. DISCUSSION: Faculty development offices should consider the time constraints of clinical teachers when planning programming on teaching and assessment. To enhance uptake, medical education publications need to consider approaches that best meet the needs of a targeted audiences, including frontline clinical teachers. This may involve novel methods and formats that render evidence and findings from their studies more easily ‘digestible’ by clinical teachers to narrow the knowledge to practice gap. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03104-4. BioMed Central 2022-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8772128/ /pubmed/35045845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03104-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Doja, Asif Lavin Venegas, Carolina Cowley, Lindsay Wiesenfeld, Lorne Writer, Hilary Clarkin, Chantalle Barriers and facilitators to program directors’ use of the medical education literature: a qualitative study |
title | Barriers and facilitators to program directors’ use of the medical education literature: a qualitative study |
title_full | Barriers and facilitators to program directors’ use of the medical education literature: a qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Barriers and facilitators to program directors’ use of the medical education literature: a qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Barriers and facilitators to program directors’ use of the medical education literature: a qualitative study |
title_short | Barriers and facilitators to program directors’ use of the medical education literature: a qualitative study |
title_sort | barriers and facilitators to program directors’ use of the medical education literature: a qualitative study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8772128/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35045845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03104-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dojaasif barriersandfacilitatorstoprogramdirectorsuseofthemedicaleducationliteratureaqualitativestudy AT lavinvenegascarolina barriersandfacilitatorstoprogramdirectorsuseofthemedicaleducationliteratureaqualitativestudy AT cowleylindsay barriersandfacilitatorstoprogramdirectorsuseofthemedicaleducationliteratureaqualitativestudy AT wiesenfeldlorne barriersandfacilitatorstoprogramdirectorsuseofthemedicaleducationliteratureaqualitativestudy AT writerhilary barriersandfacilitatorstoprogramdirectorsuseofthemedicaleducationliteratureaqualitativestudy AT clarkinchantalle barriersandfacilitatorstoprogramdirectorsuseofthemedicaleducationliteratureaqualitativestudy |