A systematic review of the quality of reporting and risk of bias for randomized crossover trials in digestive disease journals

BACKGROUND: The quality of randomized crossover studies on digestive diseases is unclear. We aimed to review crossover trials in digestive disease journals and evaluate their reporting quality and risk of bias. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases for all crossover t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Qian, Chen, Zhi-hang, Zhang, Jin-xin, Peng, Sui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Systematic Review
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8777342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35069802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562848211067874

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8777342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35069802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562848211067874

Ejemplares similares