Cargando…
A systematic review of the quality of reporting and risk of bias for randomized crossover trials in digestive disease journals
BACKGROUND: The quality of randomized crossover studies on digestive diseases is unclear. We aimed to review crossover trials in digestive disease journals and evaluate their reporting quality and risk of bias. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases for all crossover t...
Autores principales: | Zhou, Qian, Chen, Zhi-hang, Zhang, Jin-xin, Peng, Sui |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8777342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35069802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562848211067874 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Assessment of Risk of Bias in Osteosarcoma and Ewing’s Sarcoma Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review
por: Koucheki, Robert, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Acute Effects of Dietary Fiber in Starchy Foods on Glycemic and Insulinemic Responses: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Crossover Trials
por: Tsitsou, Sofia, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Selective decontamination of the digestive tract in upper gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review with meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials
por: Scheufele, F., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Clinical impact and quality of randomized controlled trials involving interventions evaluating artificial intelligence prediction tools: a systematic review
por: Zhou, Qian, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Adherence to the PRISMA statement and its association with risk of bias in systematic reviews published in rehabilitation journals: A meta-research study
por: Innocenti, Tiziano, et al.
Publicado: (2022)