Cargando…
A comparative study of next-generation sequencing and fragment analysis for the detection and allelic ratio determination of FLT3 internal tandem duplication
BACKGROUND: Currently, FLT3 internal tandem duplication (ITD) is tested by fragment analysis. With next-generation sequencing (NGS), however, not only FLT3 ITD but also other mutations can be detected, which can provide more genetic information on disease. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8790841/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35081962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13000-022-01202-x |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Currently, FLT3 internal tandem duplication (ITD) is tested by fragment analysis. With next-generation sequencing (NGS), however, not only FLT3 ITD but also other mutations can be detected, which can provide more genetic information on disease. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the results of two tests—fragment analysis and a custom-designed, hybridization capture-based, targeted NGS panel—performed simultaneously. We used the Pindel algorithm to detect FLT3 ITD mutations. RESULTS: Among 277 bone marrow aspirate samples tested by NGS and fragment analysis, the results revealed 99.6% concordance in FLT3 ITD detection. Overall, the allele frequency (AF) attained by NGS positively correlated with the standard allelic ratio (AR) attained by fragment analysis, with a Spearman correlation coefficient (r) of 0.757 (95% confidence interval: 0.627–0.846; p < 0.001). It was concluded that an AF of 0.11 attained by NGS is the most appropriate cutoff value (with 85.3% sensitivity and 86.7% specificity) for high mutation burden criterion presented by guidelines. CONCLUSION: Sensitive FLT3 ITD detection with comprehensive information of other mutation offered by NGS could be a useful tool in clinical laboratories. Future studies will be needed to evaluate and standardize NGS AF cutoff to predict actual clinical outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13000-022-01202-x. |
---|