Cargando…
Retrieval practice and spaced learning: preventing loss of knowledge in Dutch medical sciences students in an ecologically valid setting
INTRODUCTION: Knowledge, once acquired, degrades over time. Exams that contain questions related to previously acquired knowledge (‘retrieval practice questions’) may promote retrieval practice and spaced learning, and subsequently prevent knowledge loss. To investigate this hypothesis, we compare t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8793259/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35081944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-03075-y |
_version_ | 1784640559053275136 |
---|---|
author | Donker, Stijn C. M. Vorstenbosch, Marc A. T. M. Gerhardus, Martin J. T. Thijssen, Dick H. J. |
author_facet | Donker, Stijn C. M. Vorstenbosch, Marc A. T. M. Gerhardus, Martin J. T. Thijssen, Dick H. J. |
author_sort | Donker, Stijn C. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Knowledge, once acquired, degrades over time. Exams that contain questions related to previously acquired knowledge (‘retrieval practice questions’) may promote retrieval practice and spaced learning, and subsequently prevent knowledge loss. To investigate this hypothesis, we compare the score of retrieval practice questions to regular questions in exams of a two-year (bio)medical study program. METHODS: The two-year “Mechanisms of Health and Disease”-program for biomedical sciences and medical students in Nijmegen (the Netherlands) contains 14 spaced exams of 80 questions each. The percentages of correct-, false-, and non-answers were compared between regular questions and retrieval practice questions. Using Pearson correlations between question scores and exam scores (RiT-values), the impact of retrieval practice questions on the internal consistency of exams was determined. Mixed model analyses determined changes in outcomes across time. RESULTS: Analysis of 2006 regular questions and 1728 retrieval practice questions revealed a significantly higher percentage of correct and false answers, and a significantly lower percentage of non-answers, in retrieval practice questions versus regular questions (all P < 0.05). Scores did not change across time. RiT-values were slightly lower in retrieval practice questions, with a small inverse trend across time. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate preservation of knowledge, possibly related to retrieval practice and/or spaced learning. Although the RiT-values of retrieval practice questions were slightly lower than those of regular questions, the discriminative capacity was well within acceptable range. These data highlight the potency of retrieval practice questions to prevent knowledge decrement, without altering exam quality. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-021-03075-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8793259 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87932592022-02-03 Retrieval practice and spaced learning: preventing loss of knowledge in Dutch medical sciences students in an ecologically valid setting Donker, Stijn C. M. Vorstenbosch, Marc A. T. M. Gerhardus, Martin J. T. Thijssen, Dick H. J. BMC Med Educ Research INTRODUCTION: Knowledge, once acquired, degrades over time. Exams that contain questions related to previously acquired knowledge (‘retrieval practice questions’) may promote retrieval practice and spaced learning, and subsequently prevent knowledge loss. To investigate this hypothesis, we compare the score of retrieval practice questions to regular questions in exams of a two-year (bio)medical study program. METHODS: The two-year “Mechanisms of Health and Disease”-program for biomedical sciences and medical students in Nijmegen (the Netherlands) contains 14 spaced exams of 80 questions each. The percentages of correct-, false-, and non-answers were compared between regular questions and retrieval practice questions. Using Pearson correlations between question scores and exam scores (RiT-values), the impact of retrieval practice questions on the internal consistency of exams was determined. Mixed model analyses determined changes in outcomes across time. RESULTS: Analysis of 2006 regular questions and 1728 retrieval practice questions revealed a significantly higher percentage of correct and false answers, and a significantly lower percentage of non-answers, in retrieval practice questions versus regular questions (all P < 0.05). Scores did not change across time. RiT-values were slightly lower in retrieval practice questions, with a small inverse trend across time. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate preservation of knowledge, possibly related to retrieval practice and/or spaced learning. Although the RiT-values of retrieval practice questions were slightly lower than those of regular questions, the discriminative capacity was well within acceptable range. These data highlight the potency of retrieval practice questions to prevent knowledge decrement, without altering exam quality. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-021-03075-y. BioMed Central 2022-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8793259/ /pubmed/35081944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-03075-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Donker, Stijn C. M. Vorstenbosch, Marc A. T. M. Gerhardus, Martin J. T. Thijssen, Dick H. J. Retrieval practice and spaced learning: preventing loss of knowledge in Dutch medical sciences students in an ecologically valid setting |
title | Retrieval practice and spaced learning: preventing loss of knowledge in Dutch medical sciences students in an ecologically valid setting |
title_full | Retrieval practice and spaced learning: preventing loss of knowledge in Dutch medical sciences students in an ecologically valid setting |
title_fullStr | Retrieval practice and spaced learning: preventing loss of knowledge in Dutch medical sciences students in an ecologically valid setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Retrieval practice and spaced learning: preventing loss of knowledge in Dutch medical sciences students in an ecologically valid setting |
title_short | Retrieval practice and spaced learning: preventing loss of knowledge in Dutch medical sciences students in an ecologically valid setting |
title_sort | retrieval practice and spaced learning: preventing loss of knowledge in dutch medical sciences students in an ecologically valid setting |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8793259/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35081944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-03075-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT donkerstijncm retrievalpracticeandspacedlearningpreventinglossofknowledgeindutchmedicalsciencesstudentsinanecologicallyvalidsetting AT vorstenboschmarcatm retrievalpracticeandspacedlearningpreventinglossofknowledgeindutchmedicalsciencesstudentsinanecologicallyvalidsetting AT gerhardusmartinjt retrievalpracticeandspacedlearningpreventinglossofknowledgeindutchmedicalsciencesstudentsinanecologicallyvalidsetting AT thijssendickhj retrievalpracticeandspacedlearningpreventinglossofknowledgeindutchmedicalsciencesstudentsinanecologicallyvalidsetting |