Cargando…

Use of Protein Content, Amylose Content, and RVA Parameters to Evaluate the Taste Quality of Rice

Taste quality of rice is the key to its value. However, it is greatly affected by rice types and the environment. It is a complex but necessary factor to accurately evaluate the taste quality of various types of rice in different environments. In this study, 7 different types of rice with different...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Shijie, Wang, Enting, Li, Chengxuan, Cai, Mingli, Cheng, Bo, Cao, Cougui, Jiang, Yang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8793496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35096925
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.758547
_version_ 1784640614549159936
author Shi, Shijie
Wang, Enting
Li, Chengxuan
Cai, Mingli
Cheng, Bo
Cao, Cougui
Jiang, Yang
author_facet Shi, Shijie
Wang, Enting
Li, Chengxuan
Cai, Mingli
Cheng, Bo
Cao, Cougui
Jiang, Yang
author_sort Shi, Shijie
collection PubMed
description Taste quality of rice is the key to its value. However, it is greatly affected by rice types and the environment. It is a complex but necessary factor to accurately evaluate the taste quality of various types of rice in different environments. In this study, 7 different types of rice with different taste values were used as materials, and 12 nitrogen fertilizer treatments were applied to obtain 84 different rice taste values. We used protein content, amylose content, and RVA to evaluate changes in the taste value of rice. Rice with high taste value tended to have higher amylose content, peak viscosity, hold viscosity, final viscosity, and breakdown, as well as lower protein content, pasting temperature, and peak time. Protein and amylose contents affected the taste value of rice by affecting the RVA profiles except for setback. For high and low taste-value rice types, protein content could explain 66.8 and 42.9% of the variation in taste value, respectively. In the case of medium taste-value type, protein content was not enough to evaluate the taste quality of rice. Stickiness could explain 59.6% of the variation in taste value. When the protein content of rice was less than 6.61% or greater than 9.34%, it could be used to reflect the taste quality of rice. When the protein content was in between the two, protein content was not enough to reflect the taste quality of rice. Our results suggested that protein content could better reflect the taste quality change for rice, which provided a theoretical and technical basis for the accurate evaluation of the taste value of various types of rice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8793496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87934962022-01-28 Use of Protein Content, Amylose Content, and RVA Parameters to Evaluate the Taste Quality of Rice Shi, Shijie Wang, Enting Li, Chengxuan Cai, Mingli Cheng, Bo Cao, Cougui Jiang, Yang Front Nutr Nutrition Taste quality of rice is the key to its value. However, it is greatly affected by rice types and the environment. It is a complex but necessary factor to accurately evaluate the taste quality of various types of rice in different environments. In this study, 7 different types of rice with different taste values were used as materials, and 12 nitrogen fertilizer treatments were applied to obtain 84 different rice taste values. We used protein content, amylose content, and RVA to evaluate changes in the taste value of rice. Rice with high taste value tended to have higher amylose content, peak viscosity, hold viscosity, final viscosity, and breakdown, as well as lower protein content, pasting temperature, and peak time. Protein and amylose contents affected the taste value of rice by affecting the RVA profiles except for setback. For high and low taste-value rice types, protein content could explain 66.8 and 42.9% of the variation in taste value, respectively. In the case of medium taste-value type, protein content was not enough to evaluate the taste quality of rice. Stickiness could explain 59.6% of the variation in taste value. When the protein content of rice was less than 6.61% or greater than 9.34%, it could be used to reflect the taste quality of rice. When the protein content was in between the two, protein content was not enough to reflect the taste quality of rice. Our results suggested that protein content could better reflect the taste quality change for rice, which provided a theoretical and technical basis for the accurate evaluation of the taste value of various types of rice. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8793496/ /pubmed/35096925 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.758547 Text en Copyright © 2022 Shi, Wang, Li, Cai, Cheng, Cao and Jiang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Nutrition
Shi, Shijie
Wang, Enting
Li, Chengxuan
Cai, Mingli
Cheng, Bo
Cao, Cougui
Jiang, Yang
Use of Protein Content, Amylose Content, and RVA Parameters to Evaluate the Taste Quality of Rice
title Use of Protein Content, Amylose Content, and RVA Parameters to Evaluate the Taste Quality of Rice
title_full Use of Protein Content, Amylose Content, and RVA Parameters to Evaluate the Taste Quality of Rice
title_fullStr Use of Protein Content, Amylose Content, and RVA Parameters to Evaluate the Taste Quality of Rice
title_full_unstemmed Use of Protein Content, Amylose Content, and RVA Parameters to Evaluate the Taste Quality of Rice
title_short Use of Protein Content, Amylose Content, and RVA Parameters to Evaluate the Taste Quality of Rice
title_sort use of protein content, amylose content, and rva parameters to evaluate the taste quality of rice
topic Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8793496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35096925
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.758547
work_keys_str_mv AT shishijie useofproteincontentamylosecontentandrvaparameterstoevaluatethetastequalityofrice
AT wangenting useofproteincontentamylosecontentandrvaparameterstoevaluatethetastequalityofrice
AT lichengxuan useofproteincontentamylosecontentandrvaparameterstoevaluatethetastequalityofrice
AT caimingli useofproteincontentamylosecontentandrvaparameterstoevaluatethetastequalityofrice
AT chengbo useofproteincontentamylosecontentandrvaparameterstoevaluatethetastequalityofrice
AT caocougui useofproteincontentamylosecontentandrvaparameterstoevaluatethetastequalityofrice
AT jiangyang useofproteincontentamylosecontentandrvaparameterstoevaluatethetastequalityofrice