Cargando…
Use of Protein Content, Amylose Content, and RVA Parameters to Evaluate the Taste Quality of Rice
Taste quality of rice is the key to its value. However, it is greatly affected by rice types and the environment. It is a complex but necessary factor to accurately evaluate the taste quality of various types of rice in different environments. In this study, 7 different types of rice with different...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8793496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35096925 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.758547 |
_version_ | 1784640614549159936 |
---|---|
author | Shi, Shijie Wang, Enting Li, Chengxuan Cai, Mingli Cheng, Bo Cao, Cougui Jiang, Yang |
author_facet | Shi, Shijie Wang, Enting Li, Chengxuan Cai, Mingli Cheng, Bo Cao, Cougui Jiang, Yang |
author_sort | Shi, Shijie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Taste quality of rice is the key to its value. However, it is greatly affected by rice types and the environment. It is a complex but necessary factor to accurately evaluate the taste quality of various types of rice in different environments. In this study, 7 different types of rice with different taste values were used as materials, and 12 nitrogen fertilizer treatments were applied to obtain 84 different rice taste values. We used protein content, amylose content, and RVA to evaluate changes in the taste value of rice. Rice with high taste value tended to have higher amylose content, peak viscosity, hold viscosity, final viscosity, and breakdown, as well as lower protein content, pasting temperature, and peak time. Protein and amylose contents affected the taste value of rice by affecting the RVA profiles except for setback. For high and low taste-value rice types, protein content could explain 66.8 and 42.9% of the variation in taste value, respectively. In the case of medium taste-value type, protein content was not enough to evaluate the taste quality of rice. Stickiness could explain 59.6% of the variation in taste value. When the protein content of rice was less than 6.61% or greater than 9.34%, it could be used to reflect the taste quality of rice. When the protein content was in between the two, protein content was not enough to reflect the taste quality of rice. Our results suggested that protein content could better reflect the taste quality change for rice, which provided a theoretical and technical basis for the accurate evaluation of the taste value of various types of rice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8793496 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87934962022-01-28 Use of Protein Content, Amylose Content, and RVA Parameters to Evaluate the Taste Quality of Rice Shi, Shijie Wang, Enting Li, Chengxuan Cai, Mingli Cheng, Bo Cao, Cougui Jiang, Yang Front Nutr Nutrition Taste quality of rice is the key to its value. However, it is greatly affected by rice types and the environment. It is a complex but necessary factor to accurately evaluate the taste quality of various types of rice in different environments. In this study, 7 different types of rice with different taste values were used as materials, and 12 nitrogen fertilizer treatments were applied to obtain 84 different rice taste values. We used protein content, amylose content, and RVA to evaluate changes in the taste value of rice. Rice with high taste value tended to have higher amylose content, peak viscosity, hold viscosity, final viscosity, and breakdown, as well as lower protein content, pasting temperature, and peak time. Protein and amylose contents affected the taste value of rice by affecting the RVA profiles except for setback. For high and low taste-value rice types, protein content could explain 66.8 and 42.9% of the variation in taste value, respectively. In the case of medium taste-value type, protein content was not enough to evaluate the taste quality of rice. Stickiness could explain 59.6% of the variation in taste value. When the protein content of rice was less than 6.61% or greater than 9.34%, it could be used to reflect the taste quality of rice. When the protein content was in between the two, protein content was not enough to reflect the taste quality of rice. Our results suggested that protein content could better reflect the taste quality change for rice, which provided a theoretical and technical basis for the accurate evaluation of the taste value of various types of rice. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8793496/ /pubmed/35096925 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.758547 Text en Copyright © 2022 Shi, Wang, Li, Cai, Cheng, Cao and Jiang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Nutrition Shi, Shijie Wang, Enting Li, Chengxuan Cai, Mingli Cheng, Bo Cao, Cougui Jiang, Yang Use of Protein Content, Amylose Content, and RVA Parameters to Evaluate the Taste Quality of Rice |
title | Use of Protein Content, Amylose Content, and RVA Parameters to Evaluate the Taste Quality of Rice |
title_full | Use of Protein Content, Amylose Content, and RVA Parameters to Evaluate the Taste Quality of Rice |
title_fullStr | Use of Protein Content, Amylose Content, and RVA Parameters to Evaluate the Taste Quality of Rice |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of Protein Content, Amylose Content, and RVA Parameters to Evaluate the Taste Quality of Rice |
title_short | Use of Protein Content, Amylose Content, and RVA Parameters to Evaluate the Taste Quality of Rice |
title_sort | use of protein content, amylose content, and rva parameters to evaluate the taste quality of rice |
topic | Nutrition |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8793496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35096925 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.758547 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shishijie useofproteincontentamylosecontentandrvaparameterstoevaluatethetastequalityofrice AT wangenting useofproteincontentamylosecontentandrvaparameterstoevaluatethetastequalityofrice AT lichengxuan useofproteincontentamylosecontentandrvaparameterstoevaluatethetastequalityofrice AT caimingli useofproteincontentamylosecontentandrvaparameterstoevaluatethetastequalityofrice AT chengbo useofproteincontentamylosecontentandrvaparameterstoevaluatethetastequalityofrice AT caocougui useofproteincontentamylosecontentandrvaparameterstoevaluatethetastequalityofrice AT jiangyang useofproteincontentamylosecontentandrvaparameterstoevaluatethetastequalityofrice |