Cargando…
Indeterminate and oncogenic potential: CHIP vs CHOP mutations in AML with NPM1 alteration
In AML patients, recurrent mutations were shown to persist in remission, however, only some have a prognostic value and persistent mutations might therefore reflect a re-established premalignant state or truly active disease causing relapse. We aimed to dissect the nature of co-mutations in NPM1 mut...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8807394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34376804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41375-021-01368-1 |
_version_ | 1784643657706504192 |
---|---|
author | Cappelli, Luca Vincenzo Meggendorfer, Manja Baer, Constance Nadarajah, Niroshan Hutter, Stephan Jeromin, Sabine Dicker, Frank Kern, Wolfgang Haferlach, Torsten Haferlach, Claudia Höllein, Alexander |
author_facet | Cappelli, Luca Vincenzo Meggendorfer, Manja Baer, Constance Nadarajah, Niroshan Hutter, Stephan Jeromin, Sabine Dicker, Frank Kern, Wolfgang Haferlach, Torsten Haferlach, Claudia Höllein, Alexander |
author_sort | Cappelli, Luca Vincenzo |
collection | PubMed |
description | In AML patients, recurrent mutations were shown to persist in remission, however, only some have a prognostic value and persistent mutations might therefore reflect a re-established premalignant state or truly active disease causing relapse. We aimed to dissect the nature of co-mutations in NPM1 mutated AML where the detection of NPM1 transcripts allows highly specific and sensitive detection of complete molecular remission (CMR). We analysed 150 consecutive patients who achieved CMR following intensive treatment by next generation sequencing on paired samples at diagnosis, CMR and relapse (38/150 patients). Patients with persistence or the acquisition of non-DTA (DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1) mutations at CMR (23/150 patients, 15%) have a significantly worse prognosis (EFS HR = 2.7, p = 0.003; OS HR = 3.6, p = 0.012). Based on clonal evolution analysis of diagnostic, CMR and relapse samples, we redefine pre-malignant mutations and include IDH1, IDH2 and SRSF2 with the DTA genes in this newly defined group. Only the persistence or acquisition of CHOP-like (clonal hematopoiesis of oncogenic potential) mutations was significantly associated with an inferior outcome (EFS HR = 4.5, p = 0.0002; OS HR = 5.5, p = 0.002). Moreover, the detection of CHOP-like mutations at relapse was detrimental (HR = 4.5, p = 0.01). We confirmed these findings in a second independent whole genome sequencing cohort. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8807394 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88073942022-02-07 Indeterminate and oncogenic potential: CHIP vs CHOP mutations in AML with NPM1 alteration Cappelli, Luca Vincenzo Meggendorfer, Manja Baer, Constance Nadarajah, Niroshan Hutter, Stephan Jeromin, Sabine Dicker, Frank Kern, Wolfgang Haferlach, Torsten Haferlach, Claudia Höllein, Alexander Leukemia Article In AML patients, recurrent mutations were shown to persist in remission, however, only some have a prognostic value and persistent mutations might therefore reflect a re-established premalignant state or truly active disease causing relapse. We aimed to dissect the nature of co-mutations in NPM1 mutated AML where the detection of NPM1 transcripts allows highly specific and sensitive detection of complete molecular remission (CMR). We analysed 150 consecutive patients who achieved CMR following intensive treatment by next generation sequencing on paired samples at diagnosis, CMR and relapse (38/150 patients). Patients with persistence or the acquisition of non-DTA (DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1) mutations at CMR (23/150 patients, 15%) have a significantly worse prognosis (EFS HR = 2.7, p = 0.003; OS HR = 3.6, p = 0.012). Based on clonal evolution analysis of diagnostic, CMR and relapse samples, we redefine pre-malignant mutations and include IDH1, IDH2 and SRSF2 with the DTA genes in this newly defined group. Only the persistence or acquisition of CHOP-like (clonal hematopoiesis of oncogenic potential) mutations was significantly associated with an inferior outcome (EFS HR = 4.5, p = 0.0002; OS HR = 5.5, p = 0.002). Moreover, the detection of CHOP-like mutations at relapse was detrimental (HR = 4.5, p = 0.01). We confirmed these findings in a second independent whole genome sequencing cohort. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-08-10 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8807394/ /pubmed/34376804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41375-021-01368-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Cappelli, Luca Vincenzo Meggendorfer, Manja Baer, Constance Nadarajah, Niroshan Hutter, Stephan Jeromin, Sabine Dicker, Frank Kern, Wolfgang Haferlach, Torsten Haferlach, Claudia Höllein, Alexander Indeterminate and oncogenic potential: CHIP vs CHOP mutations in AML with NPM1 alteration |
title | Indeterminate and oncogenic potential: CHIP vs CHOP mutations in AML with NPM1 alteration |
title_full | Indeterminate and oncogenic potential: CHIP vs CHOP mutations in AML with NPM1 alteration |
title_fullStr | Indeterminate and oncogenic potential: CHIP vs CHOP mutations in AML with NPM1 alteration |
title_full_unstemmed | Indeterminate and oncogenic potential: CHIP vs CHOP mutations in AML with NPM1 alteration |
title_short | Indeterminate and oncogenic potential: CHIP vs CHOP mutations in AML with NPM1 alteration |
title_sort | indeterminate and oncogenic potential: chip vs chop mutations in aml with npm1 alteration |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8807394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34376804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41375-021-01368-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cappellilucavincenzo indeterminateandoncogenicpotentialchipvschopmutationsinamlwithnpm1alteration AT meggendorfermanja indeterminateandoncogenicpotentialchipvschopmutationsinamlwithnpm1alteration AT baerconstance indeterminateandoncogenicpotentialchipvschopmutationsinamlwithnpm1alteration AT nadarajahniroshan indeterminateandoncogenicpotentialchipvschopmutationsinamlwithnpm1alteration AT hutterstephan indeterminateandoncogenicpotentialchipvschopmutationsinamlwithnpm1alteration AT jerominsabine indeterminateandoncogenicpotentialchipvschopmutationsinamlwithnpm1alteration AT dickerfrank indeterminateandoncogenicpotentialchipvschopmutationsinamlwithnpm1alteration AT kernwolfgang indeterminateandoncogenicpotentialchipvschopmutationsinamlwithnpm1alteration AT haferlachtorsten indeterminateandoncogenicpotentialchipvschopmutationsinamlwithnpm1alteration AT haferlachclaudia indeterminateandoncogenicpotentialchipvschopmutationsinamlwithnpm1alteration AT holleinalexander indeterminateandoncogenicpotentialchipvschopmutationsinamlwithnpm1alteration |