Cargando…
Medical students’ adoption and evaluation of a completely digital general practice clerkship – cross-sectional survey and cohort comparison with face-to-face teaching
BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the University of Leipzig completely switched to online teaching. Thus, we developed a practice-oriented digital substitute for a two-week mandatory general practice (GP) clerkship. Main components were processing of clinical cases and additional GP topics,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35107417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2022.2028334 |
_version_ | 1784644727249829888 |
---|---|
author | Fehl, Marina Gehres, Vera Geier, Anne-Kathrin Mundt, Thomas Klinge, Kay Frese, Thomas Bleckwenn, Markus Deutsch, Tobias |
author_facet | Fehl, Marina Gehres, Vera Geier, Anne-Kathrin Mundt, Thomas Klinge, Kay Frese, Thomas Bleckwenn, Markus Deutsch, Tobias |
author_sort | Fehl, Marina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the University of Leipzig completely switched to online teaching. Thus, we developed a practice-oriented digital substitute for a two-week mandatory general practice (GP) clerkship. Main components were processing of clinical cases and additional GP topics, visual diagnoses, information and examination videos, and regular remote exchanges with associated GP teachers. We took the chance to comprehensively evaluate the new teaching formats (acceptance, use, working enjoyment, learning gain, practical relevance, insights into general practice) and to compare evaluations with two previous semesters to gain insights for future blended learning concepts. METHODS: Cross-sectional post-hoc online evaluation among fourth year (of six) medical students participating in the digital mandatory 2-week GP clerkship during summer semester 2020; additional cohort comparison with two previous semesters (face-to-face clerkship). RESULTS: Out of 192 participants in the digital clerkship, 99 completed our questionnaire (response rate = 51.6%). Results were compared with 277 previous evaluations (face-to-face semesters). Most participants reported having enjoyed the online-based clerkship (87.9%), having learned a lot (89.9%), having gained insights into general practice (76.8%), and perceived high practical relevance (90.9%). Implementing the new teaching formats into future face-to-face clerkships was welcomed by 65.6%. Clinical cases, visual diagnoses, examination videos and communication with GP teachers were rated best regarding working enjoyment, learning gain, practical relevance and insights into a GP’s work. Cohort comparison revealed somewhat better evaluations regarding knowledge transfer for the digital clerkship while imparting of skills and attitudes was reportedly worse. CONCLUSIONS: Students welcomed the digital content and perceived relevant learning gain. Our results may help to develop future blended learning concepts. Clinical cases, examination videos and visual diagnoses appear to be particularly suitable as useful online complements which could enrich face-to-face teaching. As students especially valued the exclusive time for exchanges with their preceptor, this should be facilitated in face-to-face clerkships. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8812779 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88127792022-02-04 Medical students’ adoption and evaluation of a completely digital general practice clerkship – cross-sectional survey and cohort comparison with face-to-face teaching Fehl, Marina Gehres, Vera Geier, Anne-Kathrin Mundt, Thomas Klinge, Kay Frese, Thomas Bleckwenn, Markus Deutsch, Tobias Med Educ Online Research Article BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the University of Leipzig completely switched to online teaching. Thus, we developed a practice-oriented digital substitute for a two-week mandatory general practice (GP) clerkship. Main components were processing of clinical cases and additional GP topics, visual diagnoses, information and examination videos, and regular remote exchanges with associated GP teachers. We took the chance to comprehensively evaluate the new teaching formats (acceptance, use, working enjoyment, learning gain, practical relevance, insights into general practice) and to compare evaluations with two previous semesters to gain insights for future blended learning concepts. METHODS: Cross-sectional post-hoc online evaluation among fourth year (of six) medical students participating in the digital mandatory 2-week GP clerkship during summer semester 2020; additional cohort comparison with two previous semesters (face-to-face clerkship). RESULTS: Out of 192 participants in the digital clerkship, 99 completed our questionnaire (response rate = 51.6%). Results were compared with 277 previous evaluations (face-to-face semesters). Most participants reported having enjoyed the online-based clerkship (87.9%), having learned a lot (89.9%), having gained insights into general practice (76.8%), and perceived high practical relevance (90.9%). Implementing the new teaching formats into future face-to-face clerkships was welcomed by 65.6%. Clinical cases, visual diagnoses, examination videos and communication with GP teachers were rated best regarding working enjoyment, learning gain, practical relevance and insights into a GP’s work. Cohort comparison revealed somewhat better evaluations regarding knowledge transfer for the digital clerkship while imparting of skills and attitudes was reportedly worse. CONCLUSIONS: Students welcomed the digital content and perceived relevant learning gain. Our results may help to develop future blended learning concepts. Clinical cases, examination videos and visual diagnoses appear to be particularly suitable as useful online complements which could enrich face-to-face teaching. As students especially valued the exclusive time for exchanges with their preceptor, this should be facilitated in face-to-face clerkships. Taylor & Francis 2022-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8812779/ /pubmed/35107417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2022.2028334 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fehl, Marina Gehres, Vera Geier, Anne-Kathrin Mundt, Thomas Klinge, Kay Frese, Thomas Bleckwenn, Markus Deutsch, Tobias Medical students’ adoption and evaluation of a completely digital general practice clerkship – cross-sectional survey and cohort comparison with face-to-face teaching |
title | Medical students’ adoption and evaluation of a completely digital general practice clerkship – cross-sectional survey and cohort comparison with face-to-face teaching |
title_full | Medical students’ adoption and evaluation of a completely digital general practice clerkship – cross-sectional survey and cohort comparison with face-to-face teaching |
title_fullStr | Medical students’ adoption and evaluation of a completely digital general practice clerkship – cross-sectional survey and cohort comparison with face-to-face teaching |
title_full_unstemmed | Medical students’ adoption and evaluation of a completely digital general practice clerkship – cross-sectional survey and cohort comparison with face-to-face teaching |
title_short | Medical students’ adoption and evaluation of a completely digital general practice clerkship – cross-sectional survey and cohort comparison with face-to-face teaching |
title_sort | medical students’ adoption and evaluation of a completely digital general practice clerkship – cross-sectional survey and cohort comparison with face-to-face teaching |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8812779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35107417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2022.2028334 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fehlmarina medicalstudentsadoptionandevaluationofacompletelydigitalgeneralpracticeclerkshipcrosssectionalsurveyandcohortcomparisonwithfacetofaceteaching AT gehresvera medicalstudentsadoptionandevaluationofacompletelydigitalgeneralpracticeclerkshipcrosssectionalsurveyandcohortcomparisonwithfacetofaceteaching AT geierannekathrin medicalstudentsadoptionandevaluationofacompletelydigitalgeneralpracticeclerkshipcrosssectionalsurveyandcohortcomparisonwithfacetofaceteaching AT mundtthomas medicalstudentsadoptionandevaluationofacompletelydigitalgeneralpracticeclerkshipcrosssectionalsurveyandcohortcomparisonwithfacetofaceteaching AT klingekay medicalstudentsadoptionandevaluationofacompletelydigitalgeneralpracticeclerkshipcrosssectionalsurveyandcohortcomparisonwithfacetofaceteaching AT fresethomas medicalstudentsadoptionandevaluationofacompletelydigitalgeneralpracticeclerkshipcrosssectionalsurveyandcohortcomparisonwithfacetofaceteaching AT bleckwennmarkus medicalstudentsadoptionandevaluationofacompletelydigitalgeneralpracticeclerkshipcrosssectionalsurveyandcohortcomparisonwithfacetofaceteaching AT deutschtobias medicalstudentsadoptionandevaluationofacompletelydigitalgeneralpracticeclerkshipcrosssectionalsurveyandcohortcomparisonwithfacetofaceteaching |