Cargando…

A Mixed-Method Approach to Develop and Validate an Integrated Food Literacy Tool for Personalized Food Literacy Guidance

BACKGROUND: Food literacy refers to all practicalities associated with healthy eating. Current food literacy tools are limited in practical use in clinical practice. Therefore, an integrated food literacy tool (IFLT) to assess food literacy and to personalize food literacy guidance was developed and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boedt, Tessy, Steenackers, Nele, Verbeke, Joke, Vermeulen, Astrid, De Backer, Charlotte, Yiga, Peter, Matthys, Christophe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35127779
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.760493
_version_ 1784645111460659200
author Boedt, Tessy
Steenackers, Nele
Verbeke, Joke
Vermeulen, Astrid
De Backer, Charlotte
Yiga, Peter
Matthys, Christophe
author_facet Boedt, Tessy
Steenackers, Nele
Verbeke, Joke
Vermeulen, Astrid
De Backer, Charlotte
Yiga, Peter
Matthys, Christophe
author_sort Boedt, Tessy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Food literacy refers to all practicalities associated with healthy eating. Current food literacy tools are limited in practical use in clinical practice. Therefore, an integrated food literacy tool (IFLT) to assess food literacy and to personalize food literacy guidance was developed and validated. METHODS: Following an iterative process, a food literacy framework was developed and food literacy goals were defined. A corresponding food literacy screener (FLS) to assess food literacy was developed along with an algorithm to provide personalized food literacy guidance based on the food literacy assessment. Content validation of the FLS was assessed by a panel of experts, measuring item and scale content validity index (I/S-CVI) and by the target population in semi structured interviews with 15 adults of reproductive age. Subsequently, an online cross-sectional survey was conducted among 114 adults of reproductive age to evaluate the validity of the FLS. Construct validity was examined against both the validated healthy eating and weight self-efficacy scale and against a food frequency questionnaire assessing healthy eating self-efficacy (HESE) and diet quality, respectively. Reliability was assessed with a two-week test-retest. Pearson correlation tests were conducted. RESULTS: An IFLT consisting of a FLS and corresponding algorithm to personalize food literacy guidance by prioritizing food literacy goals was developed. The IFLT includes 24 food literacy goals, addressed by 17 FLS items. Every item received a weighting factor based on theory and expert opinion to prioritize food literacy goals according to personal needs. Content validity revealed that the FLS was rated relevant by experts (S-CVI = 0.93) and well-understood by the target population. The FLS has a good construct validity as it was positively correlated with diet quality (r = 0.536, p < 0.001) and with HESE (r = 0.685, p < 0.001). It also showed a good test-retest reliability (r = 0.721, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The newly developed IFLT is a practically applicable, context specific theory-and expert-based dual purpose tool to assess food literacy and to personalize food literacy guidance by prioritizing individuals' food literacy goals to their needs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8814651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88146512022-02-05 A Mixed-Method Approach to Develop and Validate an Integrated Food Literacy Tool for Personalized Food Literacy Guidance Boedt, Tessy Steenackers, Nele Verbeke, Joke Vermeulen, Astrid De Backer, Charlotte Yiga, Peter Matthys, Christophe Front Nutr Nutrition BACKGROUND: Food literacy refers to all practicalities associated with healthy eating. Current food literacy tools are limited in practical use in clinical practice. Therefore, an integrated food literacy tool (IFLT) to assess food literacy and to personalize food literacy guidance was developed and validated. METHODS: Following an iterative process, a food literacy framework was developed and food literacy goals were defined. A corresponding food literacy screener (FLS) to assess food literacy was developed along with an algorithm to provide personalized food literacy guidance based on the food literacy assessment. Content validation of the FLS was assessed by a panel of experts, measuring item and scale content validity index (I/S-CVI) and by the target population in semi structured interviews with 15 adults of reproductive age. Subsequently, an online cross-sectional survey was conducted among 114 adults of reproductive age to evaluate the validity of the FLS. Construct validity was examined against both the validated healthy eating and weight self-efficacy scale and against a food frequency questionnaire assessing healthy eating self-efficacy (HESE) and diet quality, respectively. Reliability was assessed with a two-week test-retest. Pearson correlation tests were conducted. RESULTS: An IFLT consisting of a FLS and corresponding algorithm to personalize food literacy guidance by prioritizing food literacy goals was developed. The IFLT includes 24 food literacy goals, addressed by 17 FLS items. Every item received a weighting factor based on theory and expert opinion to prioritize food literacy goals according to personal needs. Content validity revealed that the FLS was rated relevant by experts (S-CVI = 0.93) and well-understood by the target population. The FLS has a good construct validity as it was positively correlated with diet quality (r = 0.536, p < 0.001) and with HESE (r = 0.685, p < 0.001). It also showed a good test-retest reliability (r = 0.721, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The newly developed IFLT is a practically applicable, context specific theory-and expert-based dual purpose tool to assess food literacy and to personalize food literacy guidance by prioritizing individuals' food literacy goals to their needs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8814651/ /pubmed/35127779 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.760493 Text en Copyright © 2022 Boedt, Steenackers, Verbeke, Vermeulen, De Backer, Yiga and Matthys. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Nutrition
Boedt, Tessy
Steenackers, Nele
Verbeke, Joke
Vermeulen, Astrid
De Backer, Charlotte
Yiga, Peter
Matthys, Christophe
A Mixed-Method Approach to Develop and Validate an Integrated Food Literacy Tool for Personalized Food Literacy Guidance
title A Mixed-Method Approach to Develop and Validate an Integrated Food Literacy Tool for Personalized Food Literacy Guidance
title_full A Mixed-Method Approach to Develop and Validate an Integrated Food Literacy Tool for Personalized Food Literacy Guidance
title_fullStr A Mixed-Method Approach to Develop and Validate an Integrated Food Literacy Tool for Personalized Food Literacy Guidance
title_full_unstemmed A Mixed-Method Approach to Develop and Validate an Integrated Food Literacy Tool for Personalized Food Literacy Guidance
title_short A Mixed-Method Approach to Develop and Validate an Integrated Food Literacy Tool for Personalized Food Literacy Guidance
title_sort mixed-method approach to develop and validate an integrated food literacy tool for personalized food literacy guidance
topic Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8814651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35127779
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.760493
work_keys_str_mv AT boedttessy amixedmethodapproachtodevelopandvalidateanintegratedfoodliteracytoolforpersonalizedfoodliteracyguidance
AT steenackersnele amixedmethodapproachtodevelopandvalidateanintegratedfoodliteracytoolforpersonalizedfoodliteracyguidance
AT verbekejoke amixedmethodapproachtodevelopandvalidateanintegratedfoodliteracytoolforpersonalizedfoodliteracyguidance
AT vermeulenastrid amixedmethodapproachtodevelopandvalidateanintegratedfoodliteracytoolforpersonalizedfoodliteracyguidance
AT debackercharlotte amixedmethodapproachtodevelopandvalidateanintegratedfoodliteracytoolforpersonalizedfoodliteracyguidance
AT yigapeter amixedmethodapproachtodevelopandvalidateanintegratedfoodliteracytoolforpersonalizedfoodliteracyguidance
AT matthyschristophe amixedmethodapproachtodevelopandvalidateanintegratedfoodliteracytoolforpersonalizedfoodliteracyguidance
AT boedttessy mixedmethodapproachtodevelopandvalidateanintegratedfoodliteracytoolforpersonalizedfoodliteracyguidance
AT steenackersnele mixedmethodapproachtodevelopandvalidateanintegratedfoodliteracytoolforpersonalizedfoodliteracyguidance
AT verbekejoke mixedmethodapproachtodevelopandvalidateanintegratedfoodliteracytoolforpersonalizedfoodliteracyguidance
AT vermeulenastrid mixedmethodapproachtodevelopandvalidateanintegratedfoodliteracytoolforpersonalizedfoodliteracyguidance
AT debackercharlotte mixedmethodapproachtodevelopandvalidateanintegratedfoodliteracytoolforpersonalizedfoodliteracyguidance
AT yigapeter mixedmethodapproachtodevelopandvalidateanintegratedfoodliteracytoolforpersonalizedfoodliteracyguidance
AT matthyschristophe mixedmethodapproachtodevelopandvalidateanintegratedfoodliteracytoolforpersonalizedfoodliteracyguidance