Cargando…

Statistical analysis plan for the OPTIMUM study: optimising immunisation using mixed schedules, an adaptive randomised controlled trial of a mixed whole-cell/acellular pertussis vaccine schedule

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this double-blind, randomised, controlled trial is to compare allergic outcomes in children following vaccination with acellular pertussis (aP) antigen (standard of care in Australia) given at 2 months of age versus whole cell pertussis (wP) in the infant vaccine schedule....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Totterdell, James A., Chacon, Gladymar Perez, Estcourt, Marie J., Jones, Mark, Richmond, Peter, Snelling, Thomas L., Marsh, Julie A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8819850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35130946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05874-6
_version_ 1784646133979545600
author Totterdell, James A.
Chacon, Gladymar Perez
Estcourt, Marie J.
Jones, Mark
Richmond, Peter
Snelling, Thomas L.
Marsh, Julie A.
author_facet Totterdell, James A.
Chacon, Gladymar Perez
Estcourt, Marie J.
Jones, Mark
Richmond, Peter
Snelling, Thomas L.
Marsh, Julie A.
author_sort Totterdell, James A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this double-blind, randomised, controlled trial is to compare allergic outcomes in children following vaccination with acellular pertussis (aP) antigen (standard of care in Australia) given at 2 months of age versus whole cell pertussis (wP) in the infant vaccine schedule. PARTICIPANTS: Up to 3000 Australian infants 6 to <12 weeks of age born ≥32 weeks gestation. INTERVENTIONS: The intervention is a wP containing vaccine as the first scheduled pertussis vaccine dose instead of an aP containing vaccine. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome is a binary indicator of history of IgE-mediated food allergy at the age of 12 months confirmed, where necessary, with an oral food challenge before 18 months of age. Secondary outcomes include (1) history of parent-reported clinician-diagnosed new onset of atopic dermatitis by 6 or 12 months of age with a positive skin prick test to any allergen before 12 months of age, (2) geometric mean concentration in pertussis toxin-specific IgG before and 21 to 35 days after a booster dose of aP at 18 months of age, and (3) sensitisation to at least one allergen by 12 months of age. RESULTS: Operating characteristics of trial decision rules were evaluated by trial simulation. The selected rules for success and futility approximately maintain type I error of 0.05 and achieved power 0.85 for a reduction in the primary outcome from 10% in the control group to 7% in the intervention group. DISCUSSION: A detailed, prospective statistical analysis plan (SAP) is presented for this Bayesian adaptive design. The plan was written by the trial statistician and details the study design, pre-specified adaptive elements, decision thresholds, statistical methods, and the simulations used to evaluate the operating characteristics of the trial. Application of this SAP will minimise bias and supports transparent and reproducible research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia & New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12617000065392. Registered on 12 January 2017 STUDY PROTOCOL: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042838 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at (10.1186/s13063-021-05874-6).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8819850
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88198502022-02-08 Statistical analysis plan for the OPTIMUM study: optimising immunisation using mixed schedules, an adaptive randomised controlled trial of a mixed whole-cell/acellular pertussis vaccine schedule Totterdell, James A. Chacon, Gladymar Perez Estcourt, Marie J. Jones, Mark Richmond, Peter Snelling, Thomas L. Marsh, Julie A. Trials Update OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this double-blind, randomised, controlled trial is to compare allergic outcomes in children following vaccination with acellular pertussis (aP) antigen (standard of care in Australia) given at 2 months of age versus whole cell pertussis (wP) in the infant vaccine schedule. PARTICIPANTS: Up to 3000 Australian infants 6 to <12 weeks of age born ≥32 weeks gestation. INTERVENTIONS: The intervention is a wP containing vaccine as the first scheduled pertussis vaccine dose instead of an aP containing vaccine. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome is a binary indicator of history of IgE-mediated food allergy at the age of 12 months confirmed, where necessary, with an oral food challenge before 18 months of age. Secondary outcomes include (1) history of parent-reported clinician-diagnosed new onset of atopic dermatitis by 6 or 12 months of age with a positive skin prick test to any allergen before 12 months of age, (2) geometric mean concentration in pertussis toxin-specific IgG before and 21 to 35 days after a booster dose of aP at 18 months of age, and (3) sensitisation to at least one allergen by 12 months of age. RESULTS: Operating characteristics of trial decision rules were evaluated by trial simulation. The selected rules for success and futility approximately maintain type I error of 0.05 and achieved power 0.85 for a reduction in the primary outcome from 10% in the control group to 7% in the intervention group. DISCUSSION: A detailed, prospective statistical analysis plan (SAP) is presented for this Bayesian adaptive design. The plan was written by the trial statistician and details the study design, pre-specified adaptive elements, decision thresholds, statistical methods, and the simulations used to evaluate the operating characteristics of the trial. Application of this SAP will minimise bias and supports transparent and reproducible research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia & New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12617000065392. Registered on 12 January 2017 STUDY PROTOCOL: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042838 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at (10.1186/s13063-021-05874-6). BioMed Central 2022-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8819850/ /pubmed/35130946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05874-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Update
Totterdell, James A.
Chacon, Gladymar Perez
Estcourt, Marie J.
Jones, Mark
Richmond, Peter
Snelling, Thomas L.
Marsh, Julie A.
Statistical analysis plan for the OPTIMUM study: optimising immunisation using mixed schedules, an adaptive randomised controlled trial of a mixed whole-cell/acellular pertussis vaccine schedule
title Statistical analysis plan for the OPTIMUM study: optimising immunisation using mixed schedules, an adaptive randomised controlled trial of a mixed whole-cell/acellular pertussis vaccine schedule
title_full Statistical analysis plan for the OPTIMUM study: optimising immunisation using mixed schedules, an adaptive randomised controlled trial of a mixed whole-cell/acellular pertussis vaccine schedule
title_fullStr Statistical analysis plan for the OPTIMUM study: optimising immunisation using mixed schedules, an adaptive randomised controlled trial of a mixed whole-cell/acellular pertussis vaccine schedule
title_full_unstemmed Statistical analysis plan for the OPTIMUM study: optimising immunisation using mixed schedules, an adaptive randomised controlled trial of a mixed whole-cell/acellular pertussis vaccine schedule
title_short Statistical analysis plan for the OPTIMUM study: optimising immunisation using mixed schedules, an adaptive randomised controlled trial of a mixed whole-cell/acellular pertussis vaccine schedule
title_sort statistical analysis plan for the optimum study: optimising immunisation using mixed schedules, an adaptive randomised controlled trial of a mixed whole-cell/acellular pertussis vaccine schedule
topic Update
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8819850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35130946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05874-6
work_keys_str_mv AT totterdelljamesa statisticalanalysisplanfortheoptimumstudyoptimisingimmunisationusingmixedschedulesanadaptiverandomisedcontrolledtrialofamixedwholecellacellularpertussisvaccineschedule
AT chacongladymarperez statisticalanalysisplanfortheoptimumstudyoptimisingimmunisationusingmixedschedulesanadaptiverandomisedcontrolledtrialofamixedwholecellacellularpertussisvaccineschedule
AT estcourtmariej statisticalanalysisplanfortheoptimumstudyoptimisingimmunisationusingmixedschedulesanadaptiverandomisedcontrolledtrialofamixedwholecellacellularpertussisvaccineschedule
AT jonesmark statisticalanalysisplanfortheoptimumstudyoptimisingimmunisationusingmixedschedulesanadaptiverandomisedcontrolledtrialofamixedwholecellacellularpertussisvaccineschedule
AT richmondpeter statisticalanalysisplanfortheoptimumstudyoptimisingimmunisationusingmixedschedulesanadaptiverandomisedcontrolledtrialofamixedwholecellacellularpertussisvaccineschedule
AT snellingthomasl statisticalanalysisplanfortheoptimumstudyoptimisingimmunisationusingmixedschedulesanadaptiverandomisedcontrolledtrialofamixedwholecellacellularpertussisvaccineschedule
AT marshjuliea statisticalanalysisplanfortheoptimumstudyoptimisingimmunisationusingmixedschedulesanadaptiverandomisedcontrolledtrialofamixedwholecellacellularpertussisvaccineschedule