Cargando…
Reward learning and working memory: Effects of massed versus spaced training and post-learning delay period
Neuroscience research has illuminated the mechanisms supporting learning from reward feedback, demonstrating a critical role for the striatum and midbrain dopamine system. However, in humans, short-term working memory that is dependent on frontal and parietal cortices can also play an important role...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8821056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34519968 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01233-7 |
_version_ | 1784646339931406336 |
---|---|
author | Wimmer, G. Elliott Poldrack, Russell A. |
author_facet | Wimmer, G. Elliott Poldrack, Russell A. |
author_sort | Wimmer, G. Elliott |
collection | PubMed |
description | Neuroscience research has illuminated the mechanisms supporting learning from reward feedback, demonstrating a critical role for the striatum and midbrain dopamine system. However, in humans, short-term working memory that is dependent on frontal and parietal cortices can also play an important role, particularly in commonly used paradigms in which learning is relatively condensed in time. Given the growing use of reward-based learning tasks in translational studies in computational psychiatry, it is important to understand the extent of the influence of working memory and also how core gradual learning mechanisms can be better isolated. In our experiments, we manipulated the spacing between repetitions along with a post-learning delay preceding a test phase. We found that learning was slower for stimuli repeated after a long delay (spaced-trained) compared to those repeated immediately (massed-trained), likely reflecting the remaining contribution of feedback learning mechanisms when working memory is not available. For massed learning, brief interruptions led to drops in subsequent performance, and individual differences in working memory capacity positively correlated with overall performance. Interestingly, when tested after a delay period but not immediately, relative preferences decayed in the massed condition and increased in the spaced condition. Our results provide additional support for a large role of working memory in reward-based learning in temporally condensed designs. We suggest that spacing training within or between sessions is a promising approach to better isolate and understand mechanisms supporting gradual reward-based learning, with particular importance for understanding potential learning dysfunctions in addiction and psychiatric disorders. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13421-021-01233-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8821056 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88210562022-02-23 Reward learning and working memory: Effects of massed versus spaced training and post-learning delay period Wimmer, G. Elliott Poldrack, Russell A. Mem Cognit Article Neuroscience research has illuminated the mechanisms supporting learning from reward feedback, demonstrating a critical role for the striatum and midbrain dopamine system. However, in humans, short-term working memory that is dependent on frontal and parietal cortices can also play an important role, particularly in commonly used paradigms in which learning is relatively condensed in time. Given the growing use of reward-based learning tasks in translational studies in computational psychiatry, it is important to understand the extent of the influence of working memory and also how core gradual learning mechanisms can be better isolated. In our experiments, we manipulated the spacing between repetitions along with a post-learning delay preceding a test phase. We found that learning was slower for stimuli repeated after a long delay (spaced-trained) compared to those repeated immediately (massed-trained), likely reflecting the remaining contribution of feedback learning mechanisms when working memory is not available. For massed learning, brief interruptions led to drops in subsequent performance, and individual differences in working memory capacity positively correlated with overall performance. Interestingly, when tested after a delay period but not immediately, relative preferences decayed in the massed condition and increased in the spaced condition. Our results provide additional support for a large role of working memory in reward-based learning in temporally condensed designs. We suggest that spacing training within or between sessions is a promising approach to better isolate and understand mechanisms supporting gradual reward-based learning, with particular importance for understanding potential learning dysfunctions in addiction and psychiatric disorders. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13421-021-01233-7. Springer US 2021-09-14 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8821056/ /pubmed/34519968 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01233-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Wimmer, G. Elliott Poldrack, Russell A. Reward learning and working memory: Effects of massed versus spaced training and post-learning delay period |
title | Reward learning and working memory: Effects of massed versus spaced training and post-learning delay period |
title_full | Reward learning and working memory: Effects of massed versus spaced training and post-learning delay period |
title_fullStr | Reward learning and working memory: Effects of massed versus spaced training and post-learning delay period |
title_full_unstemmed | Reward learning and working memory: Effects of massed versus spaced training and post-learning delay period |
title_short | Reward learning and working memory: Effects of massed versus spaced training and post-learning delay period |
title_sort | reward learning and working memory: effects of massed versus spaced training and post-learning delay period |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8821056/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34519968 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01233-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wimmergelliott rewardlearningandworkingmemoryeffectsofmassedversusspacedtrainingandpostlearningdelayperiod AT poldrackrussella rewardlearningandworkingmemoryeffectsofmassedversusspacedtrainingandpostlearningdelayperiod |