Cargando…
Beware to ignore the rare: how imputing zero-values can improve the quality of 16S rRNA gene studies results
BACKGROUND: 16S rRNA-gene sequencing is a valuable approach to characterize the taxonomic content of the whole bacterial population inhabiting a metabolic and spatial niche, providing an important opportunity to study bacteria and their role in many health and environmental mechanisms. The analysis...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35130833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-022-04587-0 |
_version_ | 1784646634331701248 |
---|---|
author | Baruzzo, Giacomo Patuzzi, Ilaria Di Camillo, Barbara |
author_facet | Baruzzo, Giacomo Patuzzi, Ilaria Di Camillo, Barbara |
author_sort | Baruzzo, Giacomo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: 16S rRNA-gene sequencing is a valuable approach to characterize the taxonomic content of the whole bacterial population inhabiting a metabolic and spatial niche, providing an important opportunity to study bacteria and their role in many health and environmental mechanisms. The analysis of data produced by amplicon sequencing, however, brings very specific methodological issues that need to be properly addressed to obtain reliable biological conclusions. Among these, 16S count data tend to be very sparse, with many null values reflecting species that are present but got unobserved due to the multiplexing constraints. However, current data workflows do not consider a step in which the information about unobserved species is recovered. RESULTS: In this work, we evaluate for the first time the effects of introducing in the 16S data workflow a new preprocessing step, zero-imputation, to recover this lost information. Due to the lack of published zero-imputation methods specifically designed for 16S count data, we considered a set of zero-imputation strategies available for other frameworks, and benchmarked them using in silico 16S count data reflecting different experimental designs. Additionally, we assessed the effect of combining zero-imputation and normalization, i.e. the only preprocessing step in current 16S workflow. Overall, we benchmarked 35 16S preprocessing pipelines assessing their ability to handle data sparsity, identify species presence/absence, recovery sample proportional abundance distributions, and improve typical downstream analyses such as computation of alpha and beta diversity indices and differential abundance analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The results clearly show that 16S data analysis greatly benefits from a properly-performed zero-imputation step, despite the choice of the right zero-imputation method having a pivotal role. In addition, we identify a set of best-performing pipelines that could be a valuable indication for data analysts. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12859-022-04587-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8822630 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88226302022-02-08 Beware to ignore the rare: how imputing zero-values can improve the quality of 16S rRNA gene studies results Baruzzo, Giacomo Patuzzi, Ilaria Di Camillo, Barbara BMC Bioinformatics Research BACKGROUND: 16S rRNA-gene sequencing is a valuable approach to characterize the taxonomic content of the whole bacterial population inhabiting a metabolic and spatial niche, providing an important opportunity to study bacteria and their role in many health and environmental mechanisms. The analysis of data produced by amplicon sequencing, however, brings very specific methodological issues that need to be properly addressed to obtain reliable biological conclusions. Among these, 16S count data tend to be very sparse, with many null values reflecting species that are present but got unobserved due to the multiplexing constraints. However, current data workflows do not consider a step in which the information about unobserved species is recovered. RESULTS: In this work, we evaluate for the first time the effects of introducing in the 16S data workflow a new preprocessing step, zero-imputation, to recover this lost information. Due to the lack of published zero-imputation methods specifically designed for 16S count data, we considered a set of zero-imputation strategies available for other frameworks, and benchmarked them using in silico 16S count data reflecting different experimental designs. Additionally, we assessed the effect of combining zero-imputation and normalization, i.e. the only preprocessing step in current 16S workflow. Overall, we benchmarked 35 16S preprocessing pipelines assessing their ability to handle data sparsity, identify species presence/absence, recovery sample proportional abundance distributions, and improve typical downstream analyses such as computation of alpha and beta diversity indices and differential abundance analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The results clearly show that 16S data analysis greatly benefits from a properly-performed zero-imputation step, despite the choice of the right zero-imputation method having a pivotal role. In addition, we identify a set of best-performing pipelines that could be a valuable indication for data analysts. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12859-022-04587-0. BioMed Central 2022-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8822630/ /pubmed/35130833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-022-04587-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Baruzzo, Giacomo Patuzzi, Ilaria Di Camillo, Barbara Beware to ignore the rare: how imputing zero-values can improve the quality of 16S rRNA gene studies results |
title | Beware to ignore the rare: how imputing zero-values can improve the quality of 16S rRNA gene studies results |
title_full | Beware to ignore the rare: how imputing zero-values can improve the quality of 16S rRNA gene studies results |
title_fullStr | Beware to ignore the rare: how imputing zero-values can improve the quality of 16S rRNA gene studies results |
title_full_unstemmed | Beware to ignore the rare: how imputing zero-values can improve the quality of 16S rRNA gene studies results |
title_short | Beware to ignore the rare: how imputing zero-values can improve the quality of 16S rRNA gene studies results |
title_sort | beware to ignore the rare: how imputing zero-values can improve the quality of 16s rrna gene studies results |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35130833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-022-04587-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baruzzogiacomo bewaretoignoretherarehowimputingzerovaluescanimprovethequalityof16srrnagenestudiesresults AT patuzziilaria bewaretoignoretherarehowimputingzerovaluescanimprovethequalityof16srrnagenestudiesresults AT dicamillobarbara bewaretoignoretherarehowimputingzerovaluescanimprovethequalityof16srrnagenestudiesresults |